Mr ChicagoRJ,
Let me introduce myself, I'm KJ though you may call me whatever you like including 'hack'.
I've been building 26 yrs now and have run the Seyberts Custom-Shop for 14 yrs.
I was one of the first C-Tecs authorized by Predator when the Repair-Station program was introduced.
To the best of my knowledge, Seyberts now does all of the Predator repair work in this country.
That became too much even for me so I've instructed some of Sey's people on the fine points of replacing ferrules, etc.
I no longer do Predator warranty work unless called upon. I wanted to make that correction to what Terry has stated.
I appreciate that Terry would speak on my behalf but when I have to defend my credentials I'm quite capable of speaking for myself.
Because I didn't respond with an opinion matching your own is of no concern to me. I've considered the source.
You're entitled to your opinion as am I. I have something on which to base that opinion. I've at least installed a tip.
"Usually, the "good" ones will stand up and say it's bad work, and not defend it." ??? Viva la difference.
The truth is that the good ones know what really went down and have chosen not to argue with those that don't.
"Then he should not defend inferior work."
I don't. I'm very critical of the work I see and the work I do. I didn't get to where I am by allowing crap.
What I will defend is the integrity of an installer who did his job as requested and is now being blamed for
pre-existing conditions of the shaft. The hash marks on the ferrule were obviously done during a previous tip install.
Apparently the owner of the shaft was OK with that because that wasn't his complaint. All he wanted was a tip-tool.
This thread is about one persons opinion of a tip install that was probably done weeks ago on a shaft that he doesn't even own.
People, if it's alright with you, I've got a life to live and this bash-session has gone on far too long.
KJ