It looks bad and it can be dangerous. At one point launching object balls off the table was not a foul at pool.Just out of curiosity, for what reasons do you think it’s the right way to do it? ... (no launching balls off the table)
It looks bad and it can be dangerous. At one point launching object balls off the table was not a foul at pool.Just out of curiosity, for what reasons do you think it’s the right way to do it? ... (no launching balls off the table)
It looks bad and it can be dangerous.
At least one object ball?... Yeah there are a lot of variations [of the rerack rule at one pocket], many incomplete. I like to keep it simple with something like: if at least one ball is pocketed in any pocket, rerack.
I don’t really disagree, but I hate a player making a show of inspecting a rack with his nose like 3” from the balls. I was trying to figure an appropriate penalty but probably was too lenient.My feeling is that the breaker has a right to know what he's breaking. If how long he takes to look is a problem, the break can be on the shot clock. I think he should also have the right to point out to the referee (if he is the racker), that there are gaps. If the ref racks badly, he needs to get feedback.
Yes, I think it is time to rework the layout. All the game rules should be together. And the section on wheelchair/parasport competition probably belongs in the Regulations. Maybe on the next major revision.... all the sections on the individual games be put together. ...
Yes, object ball. That was an oversight. Maybe “legally pocketed” would be another to way to say it. That would also cover the situation — which I forgot — of pocketing an object ball and also scratching. Rules are hard!At least one object ball?
4. Seems like "base of the ball" rules are in effect instead of "full ball" rules for ball in hand behind the head string. This applies to all games, but it's not clear to me what the WPA rules are for behind the line play. I'd like for "on or below the head string" in 6.10 and "crosses the head string" in 6.11 to be defined more clearly. I assume the base of the cue ball is the relevant point in both cases.
for me the whole ball is extremely easier to determine instead of some darkened area of the base of the ball which is an area where the ball contacts the table not an edgeI gave the onepocket.org rules a re-read, and read the WPA rules. Here are some interesting differences I noticed:
Speaking of..
- No mention of re-rack option for balls pocketed on the break. Some form of this is pretty much always used these days in my experience matching up. Pretty sure DCC uses it, too.
- I didn't see any mention of jump cues, which are generally not allowed in one pocket. That could seriously change the strategy of "doubling up" an opponent on the head rail.
- It seems that the WPA rules don't allow the possibility of pocketing an opponents ball while jumping the cue ball off the table for the pocketed ball to be re-spotted. This is sometimes attempted when following the ball in is more difficult. Are there any reasons in particular for this difference? I personally like having this option.
- Seems like "base of the ball" rules are in effect instead of "full ball" rules for ball in hand behind the head string. This applies to all games, but it's not clear to me what the WPA rules are for behind the line play. I'd like for "on or below the head string" in 6.10 and "crosses the head string" in 6.11 to be defined more clearly. I assume the base of the cue ball is the relevant point in both cases.
Maybe "the lowest point of the cue ball" is a more precise way to phrase this. "Center" is pretty good, but it has an overloaded use for tip placement, which might get confusing. Downside of "lowest" is we have to agree which way up is.