An S is only a Z without rails.
No Deflection
- Thread starter nodeflection
- Start date
An S is only a Z without rails.
U should get in different tournaments if that's a legal shot.
The "S curve" means the ball travel in the shape of the letter S, meaning two curves like a writing utensil moves when writing a letter S, capital or lower case. A "C curve" would be a ball traveling in the shape of the letter C, also following the single curve shape of your pen, pencil, or paint brush etc. when writing, upper or lower case. This does not apply to typed letters.
Last edited:
Ewww! Not that cheek!
Im not trolling anyone. I don't agree with the most of you as you don't agree with me. I won't jump into another thread and start telling people they are dumb. I had this work and I wanted to share. Go ahead and mention end mass like it disproves everything I wrote or try and joke at my expense. It will increase the chance of someone testing what I think, who might not see the thread otherwise.
Looking at the pics (specifically the blue line I put at the edge of the cb) the cb looks like it moves very much straight ahead with no squirt off line. The green line shows the stroke direction, which looks like bhe is being used to offset cb squirt.
Like a swooping stroke?? I thought this was possible also until I tested it, very much like your center cb test. I used a blue circle cb (Brunswick centennial) and lined it up so that striking dead center on the blue circle would send the cb straight into the cushion. I shot several shots using a swoop/swiping motion across the face of the cb, each time trying to hit the center of the blue circle and cause the cb to take on side spin. By observing the chalk marks (tip contact marks) on the cb, and also the action of the cb rebounding off the cushion, I learned I was wrong. Every time the cb came off the rail with side spin on it, the chalk/tip mark was not in the circle. Every time the cb came straight back off the cushion (no spin imparted) the chalk mark was dead center in the blue circle. But each stroke was done exactly the same, trying to swipe or swoop the tip across the cb to impart right spin instead of simply stroking straight through right of center. The only time spin was imparted was when the tip struck the ball right of center.
I never said anyone was dumb. When you start talking about telekinesis your all done.
What you think you are doing and whatever you are actually doing are not the same thing. We've had these discussions before.
I'm glad what you're doing is working for you. By all means keep doing it.
Sent from my LG-H918 using Tapatalk
If that idiot got hit by a bus he would argue that his injuries had nothing to do with kinetic energy. Another denizen of my Ignore list. Its growing.
I have been labeled as dumb. Black-balled said to me "your so dumb it hurts." People posting poems and talking about 2nd grade level morons and such.
I am doing exactly what I am saying, sorry it clearly isn't for you to understand. I am not new to the game. I knew of the evidence posted refuting my ideas BEFORE I posted. Years before.
I mentioned telekinesis for a reason. If you haven't had a ball roll off inappropriately after a great shot then I don't expect u to get the joke. Especially under pressure as it seems to happen at a rate that is too high.
I will keep doing what I like thanks for the permission.
Me the idiot? Im sure my calculus based physics professor would agree I knew what kinetic energy was over ten years ago. Why is it so hard for you to ignore this post. That seems idiotic to me. Maybe your information is your excuse as to why you don't play well. If you don't have that all you have is you.
I saw the BHE and I also notice the ball clearly shifted in the opposite direction as deflection. Nowhere near relevant to this thread.
How dare you quote me as using the wrong your/ you're. I said no such thing and do not appreciate being labeled as having done so.
A swooping stroke through the middle of the CB will take the CB slightly off line to the direction swooping depending on how much the swoop is curved with no side spin. For the circular type of stroke if I were to hit a high right shot I would cue a half tip high and a half tip right. If you cue too far off center there is no meat for the tip to turn. The setup would be similar to BHE. On high right the circular stroke, the cue would swoop not away from the ball but back around it to the left and down. In a sense trying to draw a line from the tip contact point to the same point on the back of the CB. Swooping would feel like a large shape through the ball that is a nice curve. Circular would be changing directions through the ball quicker and look like a kink. I like to put spin swooping outward, I can get a large or small amount of spin If I move the butt in the opposite direction as the tip. I don't use that action much because IMO excess spin is put on the ball, masse is big and overthrowing balls is the miss and I can't stand. I have had much success with swooping inward, and or circular, similar to Rob Saez action but different.
[/ATTACH]
You don't remember this? It was a few days ago. I was paraphrasing. I don't judge anyone by their spelling or grammatical use if that makes any difference.
You don't remember this? It was a few days ago. I was paraphrasing. I don't judge anyone by their spelling or grammatical use if that makes any difference.
Last edited:
I'm not them. The easiest thing to do to rile someone up is to insult their intelligence.
How long do you think you are keeping the cue tip in contract with the cue ball?
Sent from my LG-H918 using Tapatalk