NO Match for Harriman/Schmidt

He called it like he saw it, just like it was presented at the time before the later statements came from Mark and Kimberly. He later apologized and stood-up for Str8 Shots. That's the kind of stand up guy he consistently shows himself to be, so let's give the man the credit he is due. He's the one who got to the bottom of this fiasco, not you, me, nor anyone else here.

There were other factions involved, aside from the entities you mention. I'll just leave it at that. Next? You got some more for me?
 
Jenny is right. She was on the right side of this car before the vast majority of us. She was also spot on about bonus ball in the beginning. She also didn't sway from her stance. Jenny I have a lot of respect for that. Too to see free thinkers.

So what? She may just as well been on the wrong side if the facts proved differently. She's also a big supporter of Kevin Trudeau because he always treated Keith and her right. Need I say more?

As far as being a free thinker, why do you assume I'm not? I stayed out of the whole thing, only commenting on the lack of wisdom that may have been displayed by the OP in this thread. I didn't judge for or against anyone because I didn't have all the facts. All I knew was what Kim said, which came across (and still does when I re-read the OP) as a statement that her player would not be allowed to participate in a match with Mr. Harriman.

Even she now admits that her words were not well-chosen. Wars have been started by carelessly worded communication. Better to say nothing than to say the wrong thing, but it is human nature to express our opinions. JAM's opinions do nothing to sway me about anything... ever. But she has the right to believe they do, so good luck with that notion is all I can say.:)
 
You got some more for me?

Ha, ha! Tough gal, eh? Lol

Nah, I got nothin' more fer ya. I got my wife's brother coming in from Cali in a few hours. He's a real righteous dude who I haven't seen in three years, so I'm off this place for a bit. Seems he busted himself up on his Harley and needs some convalescing time. Family trumps this place 1000:1.:wink:
 
So what? She may just as well been on the wrong side if the facts proved differently. She's also a big supporter of Kevin Trudeau because he always treated Keith and her right. Need I say more?

As far as being a free thinker, why do you assume I'm not? I stayed out of the whole thing, only commenting on the lack of wisdom that may have been displayed by the OP in this thread. I didn't judge for or against anyone because I didn't have all the facts. All I knew was what Kim said, which came across (and still does when I re-read the OP) as a statement that her player would not be allowed to participate in a match with Mr. Harriman.

Even she now admits that her words were not well-chosen. Wars have been started by carelessly worded communication. Better to say nothing than to say the wrong thing, but it is human nature to express our opinions. JAM's opinions do nothing to sway me about anything... ever. But she has the right to believe they do, so good luck with that notion is all I can say.:)

You can't let it go. You talk about me not letting it go, well, look at you on this thread today. Now you're picking scabs, reaching for anything, just so you can be right.

Since you're 61 years of age and my elder, I'm going to give you a little respect and not express what I think of you at this juncture, you know, the free thinker that I am and all. :killingme:
 
So what? She may just as well been on the wrong side if the facts proved differently. She's also a big supporter of Kevin Trudeau because he always treated Keith and her right. Need I say more?

As far as being a free thinker, why do you assume I'm not? I stayed out of the whole thing, only commenting on the lack of wisdom that may have been displayed by the OP in this thread. I didn't judge for or against anyone because I didn't have all the facts. All I knew was what Kim said, which came across (and still does when I re-read the OP) as a statement that her player would not be allowed to participate in a match with Mr. Harriman.

Even she now admits that her words were not well-chosen. Wars have been started by carelessly worded communication. Better to say nothing than to say the wrong thing, but it is human nature to express our opinions. JAM's opinions do nothing to sway me about anything... ever. But she has the right to believe they do, so good luck with that notion is all I can say.:)

My apologies I think you have misunderstood me. I commented on a personality trait that I see in Jenny and did not mean to take away from you or from anyone else in this thread.
 
You know, you may think you are being funny, but your words are vulgar and disgusting. I hope the moderators take notice.

Whilst it lacked the belly laughs I was hoping for, it was not vulgar or disgusting. Quit imposing your morality onto others.
 
If all of us, self included, would stop posting in this thread, it would fall off the front page, and into obscurity, where it ultimately belongs....

Just sayin'
 
You got some more for me?

Yeaaaaah, I got some more.....
...don't you ever stop posting.

I'm still using serial commas because of you...nobody else ever convinced
me that they were necessary.

Now I've been decrying the paucity of hyphens in modern writing....
...and I used a similar example that you used for the serial comma.

Mind you, it didn't help me the other day...I ate so much cereal, I went into
a coma.
 
Since the thread is now in recap mode, I'll say I still don't know much about Str8 Shots and don't care to. And as for Kimberly, if you have problems getting along with Mark....well I'm on Mark's side. As to who was right or wrong in this thread, it's a matter of opinion, and mine hasn't changed FWIW.
 
@ SpiderWebbComm - BRING IT ANYTIME; i can hang w/ the BIG BOYS.

this ordeal has nothing to do w/the GIRL card, nor SEXUALITY - it's about BUSINESS.

after speaking w/ Kimberly @ 2 hrs yesterday, their philosophy is helping players & children in-need via pool. as a sponsor; not the promoter. and pulling repeat/referral business from their Etailer pool supply sales & husband has separate income. they do have academic requirements for all kids to qualify, which is cool.

Schmidt & Harriman are free to play w/ TAR - but Schmidt can't wear the Logo. Schmidt's been paid. Harriman's been attempted to pay, but there were complications....noted. All contracted players are now free to do whatever they want outside, but STR8 SHOTS doesn't want their logo involved if not w/ their philosophy - fair call.

i appreciate her clarification(s) - Kimberly was unfamililar & unable to keep up w/ AZBs' interests, for obvious reason(s). and while we disagreed @ some things - my philosophy & finances are not the same as theirs; nor AZBs'. Mark is proven in the Industry.

they have taken the high road & the AZB chips can fall where they may.

TAR - SCHMIDT v HARRIMAN

 
If all of us, self included, would stop posting in this thread, it would fall off the front page, and into obscurity, where it ultimately belongs....

Just sayin'

I need more detailed instructions. Could you post a picture series like Ikea does with their products?
 
Thanks... it's always good to have the final say:

"Class action lawsuits" was a figure of speech meant to be funny...i.e. "a joke."

Nobody attacked you... nor did people not have their facts straight. When you first entered the thread yesterday, you perceived the flow of posts to be attacking Str8 Shots and they weren't. Therefore, you became indignant for no reason defending someone who wasn't being attacked and then over-reacted with the suing talk.

I apologize for calling you a feminazi... and JAM as well (even though she'll wipe her ass w/ my apology, but that's ok).

I said such because it seems like every time when a woman takes a position that might be "perceived" as being off-center and a guy debates them with conviction, that guy is labeled as a bully or attacking them because they're a woman or something like that. In reality, they're getting cornered because their view is excluding other critical factors that for some reason they're choosing to not consider (which is why people asked if you were affiliated with Str8 Shots). When logic doesn't prevail and the debater is constantly labeled a bully under a false pretense, my natural reaction is to think that person is a fem-nazi (from.... Rush Limbaugh).

Women want equal everything until you get into a debate and bury them and then you get labeled as a woman-bashing cyber bully (as if you're only burying them because they're a woman, not because their positioning is weak).

It's a mind-f@# and it's a Chinese puzzle trying to get to the center of that Tootsie Roll Pop, so sometimes I make the mistake of pulling the Fem-Nazi card (which is really the equivalent of saying the debate is "rigged" in a guy-centric sort of way and just calling it quits).

So, when the back-and-forths became rigged and I was unfairly labeled a bully, I could have just taken the high road, but I didn't.

I'm sure you have a "SORRY" in there somewhere too, Fran, but we'll never know since I got the last word... and for that, I'm appreciative, because I always have a lot to say. JAM can be your shill/proxy, however. You can stick your hand in her azz and she'll flap her mouth like Kermit the Frog, I'm sure.

^^ That was a JOKE, JAM. That wasn't a cyber-bully-terrorist-attack on a poor woman such as yourself. It was also a figure of speech. If people just stopped taking what I say literally, they wouldn't be offended.

(*breathe deeeeply.....calm down....relax*)



This is an opportunity.

The opportunity is for you to still belong to this community. The requirement is that you no longer have the privilege of speaking to or about Fran or Jam.
If you feel that one or the other is breaking forum rules, please report them to me.

Outside of that, if there is any further baiting, teasing, joking etc...directed toward them it will be at your own expense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JAM
Response from Kimberly to Neil

Danny left a message while I was out of town that he had left messages for Mark but had not received a return call. I have left messages for Danny but I need him to call me.

There are two issues.

1. I need an address for Danny.

2. He asked to have us make a large donation on his behalf. I will not to do that because then Danny cannot take the write off on his taxes. He needs to make the donation himself.

If someone can please get Danny to call me or email his address to me I will gladly take care of this immediately. I cannot do anything however until I get an address.

Kimberly Griffiths
Kimberly@str8-shots.com

Danny doesn't have a phone or an email address. He has a carrier pigeon named Stu that will certainly relay your messages in a safe and timely manner.
 
This is an opportunity.

The opportunity is for you to still belong to this community. The requirement is that you no longer have the privilege of speaking to or about Fran or Jam.
If you feel that one or the other is breaking forum rules, please report them to me.

Outside of that, if there is any further baiting, teasing, joking etc...directed toward them it will be at your own expense.

Wilson... I get it. You must've had to fade a crying/complaining fest.

They really showed me.


Sent from my Galaxy S4
 
I will never stand by silently when I see an injustice, but that's me. If that is a fault in your eyes, then I'm happy to have that fault.

I kind of find it curious that you expended the time to count how many times I posted in this thread so that you could post about it. What does that say about you?


like Tony Chohan selling hundreds of pounds of pot? Or wait, like Ronnie Wiseman dumping someone....repeatedly? or wait, like Cliff Joyner constantly stiffing people AND dumping ......repeatedly? Or wait, like Kevin Trudeau robbing old and less intelligent people blind and using some of the money to fund a few pool events? or wait, like the Behrmens always slow rolling on the payouts? or wait, like Barry getting shitfaced on the live stream?

The list goes on and on. This is just a few examples of BLATANT injustices that you've staunchly defended and then cried the same old bullying crap when others have voiced their opinions. But you know that already.
 
This is an opportunity.

The opportunity is for you to still belong to this community. The requirement is that you no longer have the privilege of speaking to or about Fran or Jam.
If you feel that one or the other is breaking forum rules, please report them to me.

Outside of that, if there is any further baiting, teasing, joking etc...directed toward them it will be at your own expense.

Good call, sir....I'm not comfortable with vulgarity and women...
....even if they swear at me.
 
like Tony Chohan selling hundreds of pounds of pot? Or wait, like Ronnie Wiseman dumping someone....repeatedly? or wait, like Cliff Joyner constantly stiffing people AND dumping ......repeatedly? Or wait, like Kevin Trudeau robbing old and less intelligent people blind and using some of the money to fund a few pool events? or wait, like the Behrmens always slow rolling on the payouts? or wait, like Barry getting shitfaced on the live stream?

The list goes on and on. This is just a few examples of BLATANT injustices that you've staunchly defended and then cried the same old bullying crap when others have voiced their opinions. But you know that already.

This is very astute.

Sent from my Galaxy S4
 
Oh please.......

Sent from my Galaxy S4

I rarely speak up about that, Spidey, but I guess it was the way I was raised.
And it might be unfair to feel everybody should act like me.
So I won't belabor the point....it was a one-time post.

And I generally like your contributions.....I've saved a bunch of your
excellent information.

So let us disagree about this one thing.

Sooooo....how about them Broncos
 
Back
Top