The best I know the balls are positioned as close together as possible without touching for the six in the original rack and when replaced on it's spot. I think that is what the rules called for last I knew but I don't know if that is US rules, English rules, or both, and there is a good bit of variance between the two the last time I looked, admittedly years ago.
I have to agree with Bob, give Corey a month to work with the balls and Ronnie do the shooting with them splitting say 100,000 Euros and a 147 from the break might happen. Joe Tucker is another I might have do the ball set-up.
There is usually a sweet bonus pool for a 147. Not uncommon for there not to be any at an event. One 147 gets the full pool, more than one splits the pool. No idea what is the highest number of 147's at an event. I remember two, I think three, so I suspect the number might be between four and six but that is just a guess.
While you don't get the 147 bonus, I think the real question is if a hard break will let you score over half the points available. If you do the other player will usually cede the game. I think the answer is much the same though. You have a fairly remote chance of a break and win but you will probably turn over a table that your opponent has a far better chance of winning on in one inning.
Modern snooker has evolved to be much more like pool. It used to be that the tips were usually ratty mushroomed pieces of leather. Now a few deliberately mushroomed tips but misshapen ones are much less common. They are using nicely shaped tips now. They also may use screw on tips, apparently top quality screw on tips where you may see a tip swapped in midmatch.
Many more shots are played with major spin than years ago. All of the circus shots are much more likely to be seen attempted. I would have thought pool would have grown more like snooker but instead it is the other way around, snooker looks more like pool today. Excellent play and production values, I am more inclined to watch snooker video than pool video.
The skills shown by the snooker players seem second to none. However, Ronnie did try American pool in the IPT without success. He played well, but not at the level he needed to. In the past he has spoken lightly about pool, he has also claimed it would take him five years to catch up with the top pool players. Ronnie likes to have fun so it is anybody's guess what he really believed. I think that with the right money to chase in his prime he could have been a monster in two years or so on a pool table. I think when it comes to pocket cue sports he has some claim to being the GOAT. I believe snooker made him a multi-millionaire. Once the IPT died pool didn't have much appeal.
Hu