You are certainly correct that performing well under pressure is key. But I don't think that fact negates the points I made about the luck element. Indeed, if the rules were altered to reduce the luck element, the players you named, and others who exhibit the qualities you cited, would win an even higher percentage of the events.
I'm sure that everyone who has played a lot has both won and lost a ton of matches because of purely lucky shots -- 9-ball or 10-ball on the break or slopping in a key ball. A loss that way is agonizing. A win that way is less than fulfilling. It would be so easy to eliminate some of the game's pernicious luck.
Thanks again. In my experience, matches between good players are rarely, if ever, decided by a lucky roll. They are decided by good shooting and good playing at key stages in the match. Oscar damn sure didn't win because he got the rolls, as some people speculated. He won because he got out when he needed to and made more good shots and run outs under pressure.
My opinion remains, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!" The ten ball should count on the break and if a ball slops in three rails so be it. JMHO as always. :smile: