Luxury said:when shooting the 9 ball to win the game I use outside english on the majority of angled shots not to mention tons of other shots when I'm not needing the english for position. It is easier to make these shots with english for me.
I watch the pros play all the time on tv and I can clearly see them using outside when shooting the 9 ball when there is no reason for position.
Someone in another post is telling me that it is never easier to make a ball using english and that it should only be used for getting shape.
So do you see pros using english when making the 9? Do you use english when making certain cuts?
You're welcome Luxury.Luxury said:Thank you so much for a knowledgable answer! I would have to say however that I'm sure most of them could tell you why they use it. I hope your friend Jaden reads your reply and learns these benefits for his own game too!
Colin Colenso said:You're welcome Luxury.
In my estimation, 90% of pro-level and shortstop level guys I've met to do not have much knowledge of the actual physical principles involved in the game.
What they do have is great knowledge about what works for them and what doesn't on a great range of shots. And they are accurate shooters and great shot selectors. They're usually unsure about the why and how of much physical phenomenon such as squirt and throw.
Colin
Drew said:Is that not how it's supposed to be? I never saw Michael Jordan pull out his pen and paper to calculate the trajectory path needed to make the shot. Nor have I ever seen Tiger Woods account for the spin of the earth.
Colin Colenso said:You're welcome Luxury.
In my estimation, 90% of pro-level and shortstop level guys I've met to do not have much knowledge of the actual physical principles involved in the game.
What they do have is great knowledge about what works for them and what doesn't on a great range of shots. And they are accurate shooters and great shot selectors. They're usually unsure about the why and how of much physical phenomenon such as squirt and throw.
Colin
Deadon said:Actually, I think many use it because they can use a full stroke and the QB will travel naturally and is easier to control. Thus no skids or scratches, or choking. The full stroke is the key. Watch the players shoot a 9 into the corner at an angle. They will full stroke it two rails around any pockets. JMHO.
Colin Colenso said:There's a pretty good argument that players would be better off just playing and not analyzing too much. Certainly paralysis by analysis has caught out a lot of pool players from time to time.
But certain aspects of the game can certainly benefit from systematic analysis. Kicking systems come to mind as a great example. BHE is another example.
I prefer the concept that bad analysis causes paralysis. I think that well formulated systems based on an accurate understanding of the variables, have the potential to systematize more areas of game play. This is something I am currently working on with Dr. Dave.
What I hope that will mean, is that beginners will have a set of tools that will allow them to fast forward their abilities in playing shots with any type of spin required, and they will know the exact adjustments required. Rather than trying to learn them all from trial and error.
Once learned, a system becomes a bit like having remembered the math times tables. It becomes automatic, so then all the player has to do is focus on the feel aspects of alignment and speed control.
Colin
He posts regularly at www.billiardsdigest.com . I don't think he gives lessons, but he has a lot of materials to study on his website and in his book.Drew said:Does Dr. Dave post here? Is he still at CSU? I might go visit the guy and see about some lessons.
Another reason that your post prompted me to recall, is that it is advantageous to hit the CB as central as possible to reduce any chance of miscuing. But a pure stun shot results in quite noticeable amounts of throw and at slow speeds increase the chance of cling / skid, so a touch of outside english is a good compromise.Luxury said:Thats another reason they use it too for sure but they do use it on 5-15 degree angles where they could easily hit hard with center ball with no fear of scratching. Aiming for a fuller hit and throwing the ball in is a big appeal.
Colin Colenso said:Another reason that your post prompted me to recall, is that it is advantageous to hit the CB as central as possible to reduce any chance of miscuing. But a pure stun shot results in quite noticeable amounts of throw and at slow speeds increase the chance of cling / skid, so a touch of outside english is a good compromise.
Colin
Good on you RumsfeldTheOne said:As we know, There are known knowns. There are things we know we know. We also know There are known unknowns. That is to say We know there are some things We do not know.
But there are also unknown unknowns, The ones we don't know We don't know.
![]()
Colin Colenso said:Good on you Rumsfeld...now go back to throwing rocks at your cat
![]()