outside english

Luxury said:
when shooting the 9 ball to win the game I use outside english on the majority of angled shots not to mention tons of other shots when I'm not needing the english for position. It is easier to make these shots with english for me.

I watch the pros play all the time on tv and I can clearly see them using outside when shooting the 9 ball when there is no reason for position.

Someone in another post is telling me that it is never easier to make a ball using english and that it should only be used for getting shape.

So do you see pros using english when making the 9? Do you use english when making certain cuts?

Hi Luxury,
It is quite common for pros to use Outside Gearing English. Though they may not all be sure why they are doing it. It certainly seems to make the angle estimation easier and it reduces the effect of skids.

What it does, if the right amount of OE is used for the angle required, is cancel out throw effects, so that the OB travels exactly along the line normal to the contact point.

Below is a graph showing how much OE is required for various cat angles.

This comes from Dr. Dave's article here:
http://www.engr.colostate.edu/~dga/pool/bd_articles/2007/jan07.pdf

Also, for much more detailed info of similar nature, check all of Dr. Dave's articles here:
http://www.engr.colostate.edu/~dga/pool/bd_articles/

Colin
 

Attachments

  • Gearing English.JPG
    Gearing English.JPG
    41.4 KB · Views: 424
Thank you so much for a knowledgable answer! I would have to say however that I'm sure most of them could tell you why they use it. I hope your friend Jaden reads your reply and learns these benefits for his own game too!
 
Luxury said:
Thank you so much for a knowledgable answer! I would have to say however that I'm sure most of them could tell you why they use it. I hope your friend Jaden reads your reply and learns these benefits for his own game too!
You're welcome Luxury.

In my estimation, 90% of pro-level and shortstop level guys I've met to do not have much knowledge of the actual physical principles involved in the game.

What they do have is great knowledge about what works for them and what doesn't on a great range of shots. And they are accurate shooters and great shot selectors. They're usually unsure about the why and how of much physical phenomenon such as squirt and throw.

Colin
 
Colin Colenso said:
You're welcome Luxury.

In my estimation, 90% of pro-level and shortstop level guys I've met to do not have much knowledge of the actual physical principles involved in the game.

What they do have is great knowledge about what works for them and what doesn't on a great range of shots. And they are accurate shooters and great shot selectors. They're usually unsure about the why and how of much physical phenomenon such as squirt and throw.

Colin

Is that not how it's supposed to be? I never saw Michael Jordan pull out his pen and paper to calculate the trajectory path needed to make the shot. Nor have I ever seen Tiger Woods account for the spin of the earth.
 
Drew said:
Is that not how it's supposed to be? I never saw Michael Jordan pull out his pen and paper to calculate the trajectory path needed to make the shot. Nor have I ever seen Tiger Woods account for the spin of the earth.

There's a pretty good argument that players would be better off just playing and not analyzing too much. Certainly paralysis by analysis has caught out a lot of pool players from time to time.

But certain aspects of the game can certainly benefit from systematic analysis. Kicking systems come to mind as a great example. BHE is another example.

I prefer the concept that bad analysis causes paralysis. I think that well formulated systems based on an accurate understanding of the variables, have the potential to systematize more areas of game play. This is something I am currently working on with Dr. Dave.

What I hope that will mean, is that beginners will have a set of tools that will allow them to fast forward their abilities in playing shots with any type of spin required, and they will know the exact adjustments required. Rather than trying to learn them all from trial and error.

Once learned, a system becomes a bit like having remembered the math times tables. It becomes automatic, so then all the player has to do is focus on the feel aspects of alignment and speed control.

Colin
 
Actually, I think many use it because they can use a full stroke and the QB will travel naturally and is easier to control. Thus no skids or scratches, or choking. The full stroke is the key. Watch the players shoot a 9 into the corner at an angle. They will full stroke it two rails around any pockets. JMHO.
 
Colin Colenso said:
You're welcome Luxury.

In my estimation, 90% of pro-level and shortstop level guys I've met to do not have much knowledge of the actual physical principles involved in the game.

What they do have is great knowledge about what works for them and what doesn't on a great range of shots. And they are accurate shooters and great shot selectors. They're usually unsure about the why and how of much physical phenomenon such as squirt and throw.

Colin

Oh I was just saying that most pros (not shortstop guys) could tell you why they specifically use outside english to pocket the nine ball. I doubt you've met that many clueless pros that couldn't answer that very question. I do know where you are coming from though in a very general sense.
 
Deadon said:
Actually, I think many use it because they can use a full stroke and the QB will travel naturally and is easier to control. Thus no skids or scratches, or choking. The full stroke is the key. Watch the players shoot a 9 into the corner at an angle. They will full stroke it two rails around any pockets. JMHO.

Thats another reason they use it too for sure but they do use it on 5-15 degree angles where they could easily hit hard with center ball with no fear of scratching. Aiming for a fuller hit and throwing the ball in is a big appeal.
 
Colin Colenso said:
There's a pretty good argument that players would be better off just playing and not analyzing too much. Certainly paralysis by analysis has caught out a lot of pool players from time to time.

But certain aspects of the game can certainly benefit from systematic analysis. Kicking systems come to mind as a great example. BHE is another example.

I prefer the concept that bad analysis causes paralysis. I think that well formulated systems based on an accurate understanding of the variables, have the potential to systematize more areas of game play. This is something I am currently working on with Dr. Dave.

What I hope that will mean, is that beginners will have a set of tools that will allow them to fast forward their abilities in playing shots with any type of spin required, and they will know the exact adjustments required. Rather than trying to learn them all from trial and error.

Once learned, a system becomes a bit like having remembered the math times tables. It becomes automatic, so then all the player has to do is focus on the feel aspects of alignment and speed control.

Colin

Does Dr. Dave post here? Is he still at CSU? I might go visit the guy and see about some lessons.
 
He also has a monthly article in BD. He makes lots of good points but the language is too technical for me. It throws me off in my thinking.. gets me jumbled up. It's a personal flaw of mine. :(

Mark Wilson or Nick Varner also write for BD and they can say the same thing as Dr. Dave but they'll say it without the scientific vocabulary and I hear it more clearly that way. It's because I have NO education in science.
 
Last edited:
Luxury said:
Thats another reason they use it too for sure but they do use it on 5-15 degree angles where they could easily hit hard with center ball with no fear of scratching. Aiming for a fuller hit and throwing the ball in is a big appeal.
Another reason that your post prompted me to recall, is that it is advantageous to hit the CB as central as possible to reduce any chance of miscuing. But a pure stun shot results in quite noticeable amounts of throw and at slow speeds increase the chance of cling / skid, so a touch of outside english is a good compromise.

Colin
 
Colin Colenso said:
Another reason that your post prompted me to recall, is that it is advantageous to hit the CB as central as possible to reduce any chance of miscuing. But a pure stun shot results in quite noticeable amounts of throw and at slow speeds increase the chance of cling / skid, so a touch of outside english is a good compromise.

Colin

As we know, There are known knowns. There are things we know we know. We also know There are known unknowns. That is to say We know there are some things We do not know.

But there are also unknown unknowns, The ones we don't know We don't know.

:p
 
Let's say the nine ball is about a diamond out from the corner and the cue is in the middle of the table. Play it low-outside and stroke it confidently. You cannot scratch, so speed control and scratching are taken out of the equation...

It's table knowledge, they are shooting it just like any other shot and sending the cue down a safe path.

They are not using the english help make the ball.
 
I think there's another explanation besides throw as to why the pros often use outside english on the 9-ball, and it has to do with where the 9-ball is usually sitting at the end of the rack. Take this cuetable diagram:

http://CueTable.com/P/?@4IAtC3QPFr3RGVt3lPFr3lBBp4lbNY1lAkp3mGVt3mBJq3mObj3mbab1mSOM@

This 9-ball is where the 9-ball sits more often than not at the end of a rack run by a pro. Consider CB positions A and B, which are more or less the two places (besides straight in) that a pro would put themself to shoot this 9.

In the case of CB A, the outside english takes the angle of the CB up toward the end rail, preventing any scratch cross-side or cross-corner, even if nerves get the best of them and they hit the shot WAY too hard. In the case of B, the OE will take the CB around two rails and toward the long rail above the side pocket, which won't get them into trouble no matter how hard they hit it.

Good players say the way not to choke on the money ball is to play position on it like ny other shot. And if you're playing position, play a route that doesn't take you toward any pockets, as extra insurance against a poorly hit ball resulting in a scratch. I think that's why these two paths are the two most common you see a pro use after a cut on a 9-ball, and they both happen to involve outside english.

-Andrew
 
TheOne said:
As we know, There are known knowns. There are things we know we know. We also know There are known unknowns. That is to say We know there are some things We do not know.

But there are also unknown unknowns, The ones we don't know We don't know.

:p
Good on you Rumsfeld :rolleyes: ...now go back to throwing rocks at your cat :cool:
 
Many good players will use outside English on angled shots for the sole purpose of pocketing the ball. I've heard Buddy Hall call it "helping English". I've seen Earl set up a shot with an angle and then say, "now you'd naturally hit this ball with outside English". I don't think anyone would question these guy's ball pocketing abilities. I have an older accu-stats tape where Buddy is one of the commentators for a match between Efren and Nick Varner. Again Buddy brings up "helping English" and goes on to say that Efren is the only one he's seen that doesn't use some sort of "helping English". So, yeah, I guess it's safe to say that many players, of all levels, use English to aid in pocketing balls and not for the sole purpose of playing position.
 
In 9 ball you are required to move the CB large distances. You always want a angle and prefer to have the CB at the center of the table. To do this outside english is used to get the CB to move without much force. When shooting at the money ball you might still use outside to keep the consistancy and to still control the CB

A instructor told me to always play position on the money ball. This does 2 things. Avoids a scratch and helps you make the ball.
 
Back
Top