Perhaps I can shed a little light on the subject. Tony, compare the city league of say,Lisbon to the Portugese town of Beja. Technically,under the Portugese National Federation,they are under the same league. However,each of these city leagues is independently eligible to qualify to send people to Vegas. It is when a National Federation assembles a team from the combined national league system,what we American's call "cherry picking" players,that you have a problem meeting the criteria for the original intent of the guidelines for qualification. As an example,it would be like the German League System selecting the best players from Stuttgart,Munich,Hamburg,and Berlin to form a team to play as if they had played all year as one team. They cannot be considered a true team,as they didn't play together during the season. This is how Portugal's "Open Tournament" is a violation of the intent of the structure that leagues in the United States and Canada have operated under for over 30 years.The reason for such guidelines is to promote a fair competition between local leagues versus local leagues in a national event. It would be a small tournament if only the best player teams from each state and province would be allowed to send the 5 best players. This is exactly what transpired in the case of the team from Great Britain which consists of some pretty good players,however,it is doubtful you could find a league scoresheet to verify that 3 of them played league together for a session. I am not attempting to negate any accomplishment by the players,I am only dealing with the qualificaion process in the intent of the BCAPL Tournament.
Tony,I want you to know I am not some opinionated jerk,but a person who was actively involved with the BCA League System when Portugal,Spain,and Great Britain were being considered for admittance to the league system. I am also well versed in the European Pocket Billiard Federation,German National Pool League System,and the WPA/WCBS.