:rotflmao1: Nicely put!
I do agree with Thaiger on one thing though: whatever pace you play at, when your inning is over, your job is to get out of the way!
Agree 100%
KMRUNOUT
:rotflmao1: Nicely put!
I do agree with Thaiger on one thing though: whatever pace you play at, when your inning is over, your job is to get out of the way!
Sounds reasonable to me, although I'd prefer 30 instead of 24. Some televised tournaments do something very similar. I'm not sure of the time amounts they typically use, but it seems to be in that range.
You could easily implement this with chess clocks for non-refereed matches - two timers with two buttons to mark end of turn (one for each opponent). One opponent stopping his clock automatically starts the other one.
Very well put. Nice to see people able to *respect* both sides of the issue.
KMRUNOUT
Some folks deliberatey Slow play...maybe it frustrates the opponent? "Crap or get off the pot"...U took that long to "think" about the shoot...and that's the best U can do????
I play really fast... ala Rodney Morris...U either know what to do...or U don't. Stay down long...stay down wrong.. Trust your instincts...It's "daunting" to play someone that makes almost every shoot with position seemingly without a second thought.
U can often times break their will in warm-up's before you even play a game.
Employ a 15 sec rule per shot, with one extension per rack. It will not only improve TV viewership, it will Not become what Poker is/does.
We can't control our opponent. If you want to play fast then do so. Complaining will only frustrate you and possibly your opponent. If you don't like your opponents rate of play, don't play them again. Most of the time I hear people talking about slow players, they are complaining (I.e. making excuses) about why they (the faster player) lost.
Will it hurt TV viewership?
Watching action is what keeps viewers around, couldn't hurt to try, viewers seem to enjoy Speed Pool.