Pattern Racking 9-Ball With Soft Breaking Video

Giving everyone the same rack...bad

Allowing people to rig the rack...good


Well at least you are honest about your complete and utter lack of integrity.

I challenge you to find someone to post a video showing them manipulating the rack making balls on the break with the same or better accuracy as a rack AID provides!!! Back up your claim that cheating the rack guarantees a runout after the break!!!
 
I challenge you to find someone to post a video showing them manipulating the rack making balls on the break with the same or better accuracy as a rack AID provides!!! Back up your claim that cheating the rack guarantees a runout after the break!!!

Exactly my point. There is no guarantee when cheating the rack but without a racking aid the break becomes luck, not skill. If you want it to be even up then play alternate break when using a racking aid. Problem solved.
 
I went out and bought a "Magic Rack"... thought I'd buy the name brand, didn't want to get a knock off. Can't get the one ball to touch... can't nudge it down or the rest up.. If I rack with the MR upside down (it is a diamond shape) everything holds tight, but what about 10 ball... (Still impressed with the consistancy you get side pocket it's definetly going to take practice) Wonder if I send "Magic Rack" a pic they'll replace it, going to give it a try.
Magic%20Rack_zpsvmuzxz9z.jpg

Close up
Magic-Rack-zoom_zpsxubwjulc.jpg
 
Furthermore, all racks in all matches would be required to be racked in the same exact pattern with the 1 on the spot, the 5,6 in the second row, 2,9,4 third row, 7,8 in the 4th row, and the 3 on the bottom point.
 
Exactly my point. There is no guarantee when cheating the rack but without a racking aid the break becomes luck, not skill. If you want it to be even up then play alternate break when using a racking aid. Problem solved.

That's what I've been saying all along, put the LUCK back in the break and you have a battle to win the game AFTER the break because it's no longer an almost guaranteed win AFTER the break because the balls will never be laying in the same pattern after every break.
 
I went out and bought a "Magic Rack"... thought I'd buy the name brand, didn't want to get a knock off. Can't get the one ball to touch... can't nudge it down or the rest up.. If I rack with the MR upside down (it is a diamond shape) everything holds tight, but what about 10 ball... (Still impressed with the consistancy you get side pocket it's definetly going to take practice) Wonder if I send "Magic Rack" a pic they'll replace it, going to give it a try.
Magic%20Rack_zpsvmuzxz9z.jpg

Close up
Magic-Rack-zoom_zpsxubwjulc.jpg
Age and condition of the balls effect the racking of the balls as well, and you're showing the Belgian standard balls.
 
I went out and bought a "Magic Rack"... thought I'd buy the name brand, didn't want to get a knock off. Can't get the one ball to touch... can't nudge it down or the rest up.. If I rack with the MR upside down (it is a diamond shape) everything holds tight, but what about 10 ball... (Still impressed with the consistancy you get side pocket it's definetly going to take practice) Wonder if I send "Magic Rack" a pic they'll replace it, going to give it a try.
Magic%20Rack_zpsvmuzxz9z.jpg

Close up
Magic-Rack-zoom_zpsxubwjulc.jpg

Sometimes it takes a bit for the rack to break in. It goes the same with the Accu stat rack. Try turning the rack I've noticed they racked perfect one way and not the other. Also if you have a cheap set of balls they are not perfectly round or all the same exact size.
 
I agree with your opinion, less power and skill is needed to break the balls well with a racking template than if the balls are racked with a triangle.

Having to break the balls harder to get a good spread using a triangle can result in you losing the CB.

Now I have to say (IMO) that not all racking templates are equal in this, Renfos racking template does require you to have more skill than the plastic templates you find on the market today.


I don't care if you guys agree or not, racking aids sole purpose is to allow a player with less skills breaking the balls to have a much more powerful break that they would never have without the use of a rack AID. I already said for complaints about a player racking their own, a neutral racker could be called on to take over racking for both players, as long as human error was still present when racking the balls. Racks should be outlined as it is so that the rack stays inside the outline of the rack no matter who's racking the balls.
 
I agree with your opinion, less power and skill is needed to break the balls well with a racking template than if the balls are racked with a triangle.

Having to break the balls harder to get a good spread using a triangle can result in you losing the CB.

Now I have to say (IMO) that not all racking templates are equal in this, Renfos racking template does require you to have more skill than the plastic templates you find on the market today.

I hear ya Tony, but without the use of any kind of racking aid other than a triangle, is where pool needs to get back to if we're ever going to watch players win the rack after the break instead of on the break.
 
Furthermore, all racks in all matches would be required to be racked in the same exact pattern with the 1 on the spot, the 5,6 in the second row, 2,9,4 third row, 7,8 in the 4th row, and the 3 on the bottom point.

I've only played in one tournament and they required the 2 ball to lay opposite of the 1. So the 1, 2, & 9 balls had allocated places the rest could be random.

You are correct they are the Aramith standard, not sure of the age. I bought them off craigslist.
 
First of all, you assume one of the players is a cheater. ...
I've been to pool tournaments, so I know that is a bad assumption. I remember one match I was watching at the US Open this year. One of the players was pattern racking which was explicitly forbidden by the rules and the other player was doing the intentional-gap-to-make-a-ball-dead thing, which is also against the rules. So, you should not assume that only one of the players is a cheat.

I think the gap player didn't think the pattern player had a chance to run out anyway and the pattern player didn't realize what the gap player was doing.
 
Sometimes it takes a bit for the rack to break in. It goes the same with the Accu stat rack. Try turning the rack I've noticed they racked perfect one way and not the other. Also if you have a cheap set of balls they are not perfectly round or all the same exact size.

It does hold the 1 tight when I invert the rack. It even holds the 2 ball in tight... wouldn't think it would but it does (can't figure that one out) I may play around with autocad making my own, seems like they have the diamond cut out's facing the wrong way to me... they should taper toward tightening the rack instead of front to back, at least IMO. I'll keep playing around with the pattern racking, I'd at least like to be consistant making a wing ball and having shape on the 1. To me that's a skill, that I am not consitant on. The break is the only shot that someone is guaranteed to have to make each game and up to now the shot that I didn't practice. Thanks bud!
 
That's what I've been saying all along, put the LUCK back in the break and you have a battle to win the game AFTER the break because it's no longer an almost guaranteed win AFTER the break because the balls will never be laying in the same pattern after every break.

How about this... put 15 numbered equidistant spots on the head string. Then you draw a pill from a pill bottle. You must break from that numbered spot, and the pill is left out of the bottle till all number have been pulled.

Sure, people would just learn to break from each spot, but it remove some of the "rhythm" of breaking because a different speed and stroke would be needed from each position.
 
Training or "tapping" the table

There was a question above about tapping the balls. The way that is done in Europe seems to be very, very different from what most in the US think of when they talk about tapping the balls. In Europe, it goes something like this, from what I've heard for nine ball:

You get a template with holes in it for the places for each ball, like the usual racking templates. The holes are slightly closer than one ball diameter apart. The template is put in the required position (and taped down?). One hole at a time the cloth is dampened through the hole, a ball is placed on the hole and it is tapped firmly in place. The ball is then removed and the next hole is tapped.

The result of this "training" is nine (or 8) small craters for the balls to settle into all by themselves without any rack or template on the table when racking. Because the spacing is slightly smaller than a ball diameter the balls are tight.

Here is an example of how that works at straight pool where a template on the table wouldn't work so well:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmZh_0HrdWI
 
I hear ya.

Old school rules....



I hear ya Tony, but without the use of any kind of racking aid other than a triangle, is where pool needs to get back to if we're ever going to watch players win the rack after the break instead of on the break.
 
I have one of these. The Rack-em-Rite. It was developed by a very good player by the name of David Smith. He was selling a few of these on AZ some years back.

It works well.


There was a question above about tapping the balls. The way that is done in Europe seems to be very, very different from what most in the US think of when they talk about tapping the balls. In Europe, it goes something like this, from what I've heard for nine ball:

You get a template with holes in it for the places for each ball, like the usual racking templates. The holes are slightly closer than one ball diameter apart. The template is put in the required position (and taped down?). One hole at a time the cloth is dampened through the hole, a ball is placed on the hole and it is tapped firmly in place. The ball is then removed and the next hole is tapped.

The result of this "training" is nine (or 8) small craters for the balls to settle into all by themselves without any rack or template on the table when racking. Because the spacing is slightly smaller than a ball diameter the balls are tight.

Here is an example of how that works at straight pool where a template on the table wouldn't work so well:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmZh_0HrdWI
 
I guess you missed out on the threads where everyone chimed in with how many racks in a row they've ran or seen ran in 9 ball. I think the smallest package was a 5 pack, which is more realistic than a 10 pack on any given Sunday, let alone the claims to 15, 20 and more consecutive racks ran. And let's not forget the witness to a player running 7 and out...against 3 opponents in a row for a 21 pack....LOL ALL the Pros in the world today are just lucky these players that can run 10 packs like it's no challenge only play on AZB....or the Pros of the world today my not make a dime.....LMAO

If memory serves me correctly I admitted to a 1 pack against the ghost on my big table..:thumbup:
 
Furthermore, all racks in all matches would be required to be racked in the same exact pattern with the 1 on the spot, the 5,6 in the second row, 2,9,4 third row, 7,8 in the 4th row, and the 3 on the bottom point.

That's what I've been saying all along, put the LUCK back in the break and you have a battle to win the game AFTER the break because it's no longer an almost guaranteed win AFTER the break because the balls will never be laying in the same pattern after every break.
........................

1gz7gy.jpg
 
Back
Top