Poll: Inlayed cues vs. natural wood cues

J&D CUSTOMS

JL Cues
Silver Member
I was just wondering what you prefer. Very elaberate inlaid cues or the old school wood cues with no inlays , just really figured wood.With or without nice ringwork.
As far as playability , looks, and performance goes.
Let's see what is the majority votes.
Thanx,
Jim
 
How much inlay work will it take for you to pocket one more ball ? The question you've asked is apples/oranges. Pretty has nothing to do with performance. You can certainly have both but one is not dependent on the other.
 
KJ Cues said:
How much inlay work will it take for you to pocket one more ball ? The question you've asked is apples/oranges. Pretty has nothing to do with performance. You can certainly have both but one is not dependent on the other.

Wood no inlays the wood that has good grain will show up o so nice. Inlays cover the the true look of the wood..
 
J&D CUSTOMS said:
I was just wondering what you prefer. Very elaberate inlaid cues or the old school wood cues with no inlays , just really figured wood.With or without nice ringwork.
As far as playability , looks, and performance goes.
Let's see what is the majority votes.
Thanx,
Jim

Just what "old school really figured cues" are you talking about? I've found that most, if not all of the "old school" cues used very plain, straight grained Maple. No Birdseye or Curly in the prongs. Most handles were Ebony or Rosewood both of which are dark and become darker with age.

Dick
 
I'm all about the plain jane solid wood cues right now. Inlays just make it look like you are trying too hard to look cool. I only need a cue that does it's job, not one that get's me noticed a mile away.

ps. Wheres the poll?
 
Anyone paying 1200-1500 for plain wood forearm style cues by over-hyped-unproven cuemakers needs to put down the pipe.

JV (---JMHO
 
I agree classiccues. Lot's I have seen are over priced. Not from the makers so much as the middle man dealer. I sell mine too cheap I am told all the time. But when you see folks enjoying them in your local rooms , It's worth it to me. I love wood cues without all the bling. May be just me , who knows.
I loaded it with a poll , didn't work for some reason. Yeah Dickie , lot's of real old ones were that way cause they did not have the means of getting all the exotics as easily as we all do now. I started 16 years ago , lot's have changed in that short time , that's for sure.
Thanx,
Jim
 
wood wood wood

I like inlays, dont get me wrong. But wood grain says more to me than inlays. And I think ringwork, sets it all off.
 
classiccues said:
Anyone paying 1200-1500 for plain wood forearm style cues by over-hyped-unproven cuemakers needs to put down the pipe.

JV (---JMHO

Not to be arguing, but I find this post somewhat offensive. Cuemakers are not making what they deserve, not even the unknowns.

One plain-jane cue with nice rings costs more than one might imagine to build. First you have the bare woods, which in a nicely figured cue would be say $15 dollars for the forearm/butt & a nice wrapless birdseye handle another $15. It takes roughly 10 minutes to make each of the 10 cuts it will have before it's to assembly size, then another 3 cuts after assembly. That's 2hrs of labor. Now figure in your rings, making the billets & cutting all of the rings off for each ring pack. Making a set of three billets takes me roughly two hours, and to cut the rings for an entire cue is another hour. That's three more labor hours. Plus the cost of the materials for the rings, which mirrors the cost of the woods used in the cue, another $30. If phenolic is used for collars & caps, it's roughly $75 per 3ft. section of phenolic & it has to be bought if it's gonna be used, so another $225 divided by 20 cues, which is about how many cues can be made with a 3ft. section of phenolic, $11. The epoxy & glues used to assemble the cue will be roughly $10 worth. The joint pin is average $7, some are cheaper & some are more expensive. Can't forget the $.25 bumper. Then there's the joining screw most builders use in the "A"joint, another $7, plus the weight bolt, $3. So for the butt material cost, you have around $70.

Now figure the time it takes to order & buy all of these materials plus research. Logistics can be time consuming, but we'll say it took an hour to research & order, pay for, & inspect upon arrival all of the materials. One more labor hour.

Time for shafts. Each shaft dowel costs roughly $15 if fair quality. Assuming two shafts is $30 for raw material. Now figure the 15 cuts it takes to get a shaft to size, at 10 minutes per cut, another 2.5 labor hrs. Ferrules are roughly $3 each for most linen base materials, and a good layered tip is $10. Final assembly, cut & sand the cue for finish prep is another 2hrs of labor, and can't forget the $10 worth of sandpaper which is not cheap.

Now the cue is ready for a finish. My cues use $8 worth of finish for each cue. It takes around 2 labor hours. Polishing shafts is another hour each, so 2 more hours of labor.

This brings the total material cost to estimated $120. Labor hours are 14.5hrs.

Now begin figuring in shop utilities per month, $200.
Shop rent or mortgage per month, $500.
Equipment maintenance, filters, trash bags, paper towels, etc. per month, $100
Personal protective equipment & upkeep per month, $50 (filters for a mask are dang expensive plus rubber gloves)
That's $10,200 per year, and most builders make 40 cues per year. That's $255 per cue to build, which is more than the actual material cost of the cue.

So now we have material cost at $120, plus $255 shop costs & 14.5hrs. of labor. That's $56 per hour on a $1200 cue at $825 in the good, not bad money, huh? Ok, now figure in that there's 40 of these cues per year. That's $33,000 per year, friggin poverty. This is not even figuring in how much he has invested in his machinery & tooling, which in most cases averages well over $50,000. Now how much is his name worth? How about his knowledge, experience and expertise? Isn't paying $1200 already too cheap, so cheap that he can't feed a family of four without welfare? Now you gonna say he's unproven & unknown, so it should be even cheaper.

I'm sorry for the rant. I just really hate seeing so many cuemakers struggle to make ends meet, then to have people gripe & moan because their cue's are too expensive. The truth is that so many cuemakers are fools for selling cheap. They are giving a false sense of cost to the buyers, which makes the square builders look like they are over charging. It's not the market's fault, nor the buyers'. It's cuemakers trying to undersell until they get a name, which only works out for a select few. But in the end, it's cuemakers fighting & fussing, underselling & starving each other out to make a sale. It's rediculous. Again, I apologize for the rant. Maybe i'm far wrong but I call it like I see it.
 
I like wood. I've never seen a cue with multiple inlays that I like as well as beautiful highly figured woods. Rings are ok and can really set off the colors in the woods. I like no wrap handles made of highly figured wood.

And regarding the post above.. by qbilder.... Tap Tap Tap. I think you are 100% right. Beautiful cues, with or without inlays, are pieces of art and the builders are artisans who deserve to make a good living. I acquired one of your wrapless cues and I love to look at it... as well as play with it.
 
Last edited:
qbilder said:
Not to be arguing, but I find this post somewhat offensive. I'm sorry for the rant. I just really hate seeing so many cuemakers struggle to make ends meet, then to have people gripe & moan because their cue's are too expensive. The truth is that so many cuemakers are fools for selling cheap..

Well if you knew what I meant, or understood what I said, maybe you wouldn't. The last line.. well maybe it's because there are to many of you, and only the exceptional should command exceptional prices. It's why a Porsche costs what it does and why a Yugo costs what it does.

JV (---do they even still make Yugo's?
 
Last edited:
Qbuilder is right,that comment was out of line by classiccues.one could say that people trying to sell 6 point SW Maple/Cocobolo cues here at AZ for $2800 need to put down the pipe as well.all that aside there is a lot of time and material cost that goes into these cues,not to mention the scraps and mistakes these guys make.they cost money too.back onto the thread i like plain 4-6 point cues with nice looking woods made in the traditional way.
 
J&D CUSTOMS said:
I agree classiccues. Lot's I have seen are over priced. Not from the makers so much as the middle man dealer. I sell mine too cheap I am told all the time. But when you see folks enjoying them in your local rooms , It's worth it to me. I love wood cues without all the bling. May be just me , who knows.
I loaded it with a poll , didn't work for some reason. Yeah Dickie , lot's of real old ones were that way cause they did not have the means of getting all the exotics as easily as we all do now. I started 16 years ago , lot's have changed in that short time , that's for sure.
Thanx,
Jim

Jim,
As long as the "middleman dealer" hold the cuemakers price there is nothing wrong with that. In fact then a cuemaker should be overjoyed, especially on the second hand market. But my post was an opinion on plain wood cues by certain people selling for more than more ornate pieces by more well established cuemakers because of a little buzz. Nothing more, nothing less.

JV
 
masonh said:
Qbuilder is right,that comment was out of line by classiccues.one could say that people trying to sell 6 point SW Maple/Cocobolo cues here at AZ for $2800 need to put down the pipe as well.all that aside there is a lot of time and material cost that goes into these cues,not to mention the scraps and mistakes these guys make.they cost money too.back onto the thread i like plain 4-6 point cues with nice looking woods made in the traditional way.

See you have an opinion just like I have mine. There is nothing out of line by stating your opinion. Now if I stuck this opinion is a thread where someone was trying to sell.. lets say a Sugartree, Zyler or Richard Harris cue, then yes it would be out of line. But my comment was a direct answer to the question that was posted.

Now since you bought it up, why should I or anyone else pay for a cuemakers mistake? I screw up tile, my customer doesn't pay for that. Why are you special?

JV
 
classiccues said:
Well if you knew what I meant, or understood what I said, maybe you wouldn't. The last line.. well maybe it's because there are to many of you, and only the exceptional should command exceptional prices. It's why a Porsche costs what it does and why a Yugo costs what it does.

JV (---do they even still make Yugo's?

Again, i'm not trying to start an arguement, just venting. I understood you clearly. Your Porche compared to a Yugo is like comparing a Gina to a Southwest. More accurately would be comparing a Porche to a Huffy bicycle bought at Wal-Mart. And I don't think there are any more Yugos, by the way. Maybe in Yugo-slavia :)

My main point is that most cuemakers could make more money by working in a production cue factory, on an assembly line, than building customs. I think all customs, high end and low end alike, big name & nobody should be getting their worth. I agree that there are too many builders, but I also think there are too many politicians. We can't help that. But at least the builders can up their prices to a liveable wage instead of accepting cracker crumbs. Granted, sub-par work should not be rewarded. But so long as a guy can build a good quality cue, he should be able ask a fair price that could pay for his efforts & maybe some left over for a cheese burger & fries..
 
qbilder said:
Again, i'm not trying to start an arguement, just venting. I understood you clearly. Your Porche compared to a Yugo is like comparing a Gina to a Southwest. More accurately would be comparing a Porche to a Huffy bicycle bought at Wal-Mart. And I don't think there are any more Yugos, by the way. Maybe in Yugo-slavia :)

My main point is that most cuemakers could make more money by working in a production cue factory, on an assembly line, than building customs. I think all customs, high end and low end alike, big name & nobody should be getting their worth. I agree that there are too many builders, but I also think there are too many politicians. We can't help that. But at least the builders can up their prices to a liveable wage instead of accepting cracker crumbs. Granted, sub-par work should not be rewarded. But so long as a guy can build a good quality cue, he should be able ask a fair price that could pay for his efforts & maybe some left over for a cheese burger & fries..

Well Qbuilder.. I like a good debate.. but please for the audience state your name. Second.. when you need to lower your prices to where you FEEL you are just getting the crumbs maybe you're in the wrong business. Maybe cues are getting their worth.. maybe some cuemakers already know what the market will bare for cues. Think of it this way, you are an up and comer, maybe you're on your second batch of cues.. Do you think you should get $ 1500 or more for a 4 point cue, short splice with veneers?

I understand what you are saying.. you're underpaid. BUT thats a reflection on a whole lot of other issues, issues that are more than just upping your price. Most cuemakers could make more doing something else, but they make cues because they love to do it.

JV
 
Back
Top