Hierovision said:
lol that's classic.
I don't get it and I can't get it because I wasn't there. I understand the situation clearly. I also respect the past as a method of improvement... not something to emulate. You want the US to go back to that magical time and place. I want the US to embrace pool as a professional sport, not a hustler's game. We'll never agree on that no matter how old I get.
Now we finally found one point that we agree on, and that is that you and I will never agree. I believe that maybe your youth and lack of experience prohibits you from seeing the entire picture, the way somebody else might see the entire picture, having lived it for 30-plus years, seeing the changes evolve over time.
First off, the tournament payouts today are the EXACT same as 30 years ago at the majority of pro events. Yet, the cost of living today has skyrocketed maybe four or five times from 30 years ago. Pro events today are not quite as plentiful, as they were 30 years ago. In fact, some regional tours have today now banned pro players from participation, so it is actually getting worse and worse, like a nightmare for the pro player.
I want professional pool to excel in America. For the majority of so-called professional pool players, though, it is too expensive to follow the professional tournament trail. Unless you have a rich sugar daddy/mommy or a sponsor, it is difficult to travel around the globe today and compete in so-called pro events. I'd say you'd have to have at least 30- to $40,000 EACH AND EVERY YEAR in expendable monies to pay the costs.
Even when you win, place, or show on the pro tournament trail, you're stuck from those other events that you came in ninth, fifteenth, or maybe didn't even come in the money. The expenses in professional pool far outweigh the payouts, whether it's in Winnemucca, Philippines, Qatar, or Malta.
When you see Player A made $100,000 playing pool on the ranking charts, make sure you realize that out of that $100,000, the player may have give half to his backer/stakehorse, pay expenses, and let's not forget good old Uncle Sam. After the monies are cut up, how much do you think is left of that whopping $100,000? It's only a peanut.
There is no outside corporate sponsorship to speak of for pool, and those inside the industry, these industry sponsors are dropping off by the dozens when it comes to support of professional pool. The BCA does not seem to have the resources to advance the sport in North America.
I believe that Mark Griffin's latest innovative concept of the CSI, having regional tournaments, is the way to help pool rise in the U.S. It will bring in new blood, and this type of organization may be able to be self-sustaining when it comes to making ends meet, instead of being a money burner. I would like to think that competition in these tournaments will rise in popularity. This is a good thing.
I believe the change agent for pool is exactly what Mark Griffin is doing, and I will support it 100 percent. As far as gambling and/or hustling, it may not be everybody's cup of tea, but those who continually whine and moan about it are usually the railbirds sitting in the front row watching an action match. If you don't believe me, go to the DCC this year and see it for yourself.
