Some aggregate stats for Days 6-8 are now available here: https://forums.azbilliards.com/threads/stats-predator-premier-league-pool-9-ball-march-2023.552436/
Just brain storming further...That's a well-considered post. This is a very good event that needs tweaking. For starters, having four dead money players out of fifteen is far too many (Strickland, two ladies and a junior). Yes, they can all play but they are giving up 30-50 Fargo points in every match and can't possibly win many matches. They had a combined record of 15-45, about what one would expect, and they ensured that countless matches weren't competitive.
Last year's event had a stronger field and was a better event because of it. Matchroom has promised field filling base on merit but went in a completely different direction here. No doubt, they have their reasons, but I tend to see the Matchroom Invitational events as being for those who regularly participate in and regularly succeed in Matchroom events. It seems I'm wrong about this.
Overall, though, kudos to Matchroom. They put on a zero-entry fee event with roughly $100,000 added. To my knowledge, no American event producer does this or has ever done this.
I see that the Matchroom website now has $12,500 for second place, same as last year. That keeps the prize fund at $100,000.Looks like they reduced the prize money this year to $97,500 from last year's $100,000, with the cut being entirely from the 2nd place prize ($12,500 last year, $10,000 this year).
[And an oddity -- On Matchroom's "League Table" for last year they have the money for 1st and 2nd places reversed, with the $20,000 prize going to Filller when Ouschan actually won it. Filler had the best round-robin record but finished 2nd after the playoffs.]
Even with the questionable format, if those four "dead money" players had been replaced with Filler, Gorst, Kaci and Kazakis, it would've been vastly improved.That's a well-considered post. This is a very good event that needs tweaking. For starters, having four dead money players out of fifteen is far too many (Strickland, two ladies and a junior). Yes, they can all play but they are giving up 30-50 Fargo points in every match and can't possibly win many matches. They had a combined record of 15-45, about what one would expect, and they ensured that countless matches weren't competitive.
In his last five matches Shane played like a ballplayer in his final year before free agency. Too bad it took him so long to finally wake up.Shane and Albin looked like they didn't want to be there, and their early exits showed that.
Pure class from FSR and pure ass from Shaw. Won’t even stand up to shake FSR’s hand when he wins and then says like 3 words in the interview after the match.
Yes, I have to agree. Shaw's post match and trophy presentation behavior was pathetic. SFR played amazing pool (how 'bout that 2 ball in the final rack) and Shaw couldn't bring himselft to express anything positive about his performance. Yet, he would have expected his butt kissed if he had prevailed. Total unsportsmanship.yes, pure class vs poor class at display. he could have saved his sulking to backstage and shown some dignity for 3 minutes, but i guess he doesn't have it in him
Counterpoint: “show me someone who likes to lose, and I’ll show you a loser.”yes, pure class vs poor class at display. he could have saved his sulking to backstage and shown some dignity for 3 minutes, but i guess he doesn't have it in him
I’m not a fan of JS, but other than not standing up to shake FSR‘s hand at the completion of the match, I didn’t see an issue with Jayson’s behavior at the end of the match and in the post match presentation. He was clearly disappointed, but didn’t do or say anything disrespectful, at least that I saw. He’s a competitor and wants to win.yes, pure class vs poor class at display. he could have saved his sulking to backstage and shown some dignity for 3 minutes, but i guess he doesn't have it in him
One way to achieve what you have in mind is to give the breaker the option to have opponent push out after a wet break.I agree that the the jump cue is a bastardization of the game. However, I feel that the real problem is inherent in the push out rule to begin with.
If I break the balls and successfully make a ball why am I punished by having to push out. Everybody knows that when you are the pusher you are taking the worst of it. The problem is I haven't thought of a solution to this problem.
Yep thought of that one. Hopefully not to a jump tho!One way to achieve what you have in mind is to give the breaker the option to have opponent push out after a wet break.
He's still trying to find an Uber that'll get him there.A crying shame that Fedor Gorst couldn't have been there...
The dead quiet after a great shot was pretty brutal. I was thinking about the WC's in Qatar too. Like playing in a funeral home.Some of my thoughts:
-I too didn't really get into this. It reminded me of the Sharks challenge matches. On the surface, great matchups. But hard to watch. I really think its the lack of audiences. Its dead in the venue, same as the Qatar world championships were. FSR at the end didn't even have anyone to clap for him.
-The round robin reminded me of the IPT. Round robins hadn't been used for a long time before the IPT, due to match fixing to advance friends, and match "give up" because they were meaningless to the player. The IPT sought to change that by making every single game count. I remember going to their site and watching the live box scores and game counts. For some reason while following this event, my mind went to the IPT's chart.
-The website needs a lot of work. On a computer (I didn't try mobile), the site navigation is very difficult. Hard to find the charts due to the button clicking order. Before getting to the charts, the text on the website is so big you have to scroll all over the place to read anything. The chart itself was a bit hard to follow. It was unclear where the cutoff was for each stage. They listed days, but you'd have to do math to know what # of match's played was the actual cutoff.
-The event was too long. I think 10 players max would have been a lot better.
-The finals bracket seemed anti-climatic. They were playing all week, following the charts, going for position, etc. All to feed into a final bracket stage that was over in a relative blink of an eye. I don't know if the round robin should have been much shorter, or the brackets longer, or something else. It just seemed "a ton of work" for a "tiny final stage".
-I'm glad this was on youtube, and I'm glad I cancelled my DAZN after the doubling price increase.
I noticed that FSR stopped pushing out to a jump shot in the last two matches. All the guys are pretty awesome in "jump" mode. They have also have improved their jump "safety techniques. FSR's change of strategy made his last two matches much more exciting to me.One way to achieve what you have in mind is to give the breaker the option to have opponent push out after a wet break.