Profit for a big pool tournament.

mnorwood

Moon
Silver Member
In light of the ABP boycott of the US Open I have some questions for Jay, Jam, Justin and others that are knowledgeable about pool tournaments.

1. What was the last profitable big tournament? If so how much did they make?
2. If they made money. How? Gate, entries, PPV streams?

After observing the life cycle of pool tournaments and tours I just don't see how it makes sense to have a pool tournament and expect to make a huge profit or even make enough to break even.

In my view I think that "professional pool" if you want to call it that will have to depend on 1 and done tournaments that have a wealthy backer who is willing to take a financial bath to put on an event.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JAM
Im pretty sure Allen Hopkins does pretty well putting on the SBE but then again everybody makes out :thumbup:
 
I agree with this assessment of pool tournaments. They need a sugar daddy. I remember when the world nine ball championship was held in Cardiff Earl Strickland won $65,000 in 2002. Nine years later the top prize is $36,000. Pro pool is going the wrong way.
 
The last profitable pool tournament that I'm aware of is the BCAPL Nationals held in Vegas. Well run, well attended, and well established. The Super Expo is also a winner for Allen Hopkins. Personally I made money on the U.S. Bar Table Championships (not a lot :smile:) and that's about it. Most other events that I've worked on (as a producer or director) were losing propositions. I've had far more success owning and operating poolrooms.
 
The last profitable pool tournament that I'm aware of is the BCAPL Nationals held in Vegas. Well run, well attended, and well established. The Super Expo is also a winner for Allen Hopkins. Personally I made money on the U.S. Bar Table Championships (not a lot :smile:) and that's about it. Most other events that I've worked on (as a producer or director) were losing propositions. I've had far more success owning and operating poolrooms.

Are you saying that Greg Sullivan takes a bath every year on the Derby? I wasn't aware that was a charity affair.
 
In light of the ABP boycott of the US Open I have some questions for Jay, Jam, Justin and others that are knowledgeable about pool tournaments.

1. What was the last profitable big tournament? If so how much did they make?
2. If they made money. How? Gate, entries, PPV streams?

After observing the life cycle of pool tournaments and tours I just don't see how it makes sense to have a pool tournament and expect to make a huge profit or even make enough to break even.

In my view I think that "professional pool" if you want to call it that will have to depend on 1 and done tournaments that have a wealthy backer who is willing to take a financial bath to put on an event.

Thanks for thinking of my opinion as worthy. I'm not a minion of today's click, for lack of a better word, but I never was a follower. And I must add that I have a strong disdain for those who worship money more so than their own integrity.

Most promoters don't like to publish what they make in profit, mainly because the pool public will complain about paying gate fees and other tournament-associated expenses. What folks sometimes may not realize is that most pool promoters, as was recently stated by Mark Griffin, do this because of their love of pool, sometimes not expecting to profit financially.

From my observations, I think Allen Hopkins may profit well because his platform at Super Billiards Expo in Valley Forge, PA is solid. He has quite a few vendors who come each and every year. The leagues are plentiful in numbers, and they make up the bulk of the attendance. Pro pool is a drop in the bucket for this event, IMO.

Greg Sullivan's Derby City Classic wasn't always a profitable endeavor, but I think he has carved himself an annual event that many feel is their favorite once-a-year pool vacation. There's a little bit there for everybody. Though Greg goes out of his way to get the pros to come attend by helping them with some of their expenses, the pro pool scene at the DCC isn't what makes it special. Rather, it's the culmination of pool peeps from all walks of life that distinguish the Derby City Classic from all the rest. I think Greg Sullivan makes ends meet, which is a lot better than some promoters. If he profits, good for him. That's a huge undertaking that requires the patience of a saint when dealing with all the fires to put out to keep it running smoothly. I don't know how he does it.

Mike Zuglan is at the low end of the totem poll when it comes to profiting in pool. With all of his efforts in keeping the Joss Northeast 9-Ball Tour running, to include the two $25,000-added Turning Stone events, I think Zuglan treads water, but he's not getting rich from pool. He just got sick of all the pool politics and favoritism and organizational failures when he was hitting 'em strong and decided to stop talking and start chalking. He did things his way, and for 16 years [subject to check], the Joss tournament structure is still alive. This may be the longest running regional tour in existence, to my knowledge.

I have not had the privilege of attending the Vegas events, mainly because I won't fly in airplanes and must drive everywhere. This limits my ability to attend tournaments over on the West Coast. The Mark Griffin ventures are first class and enjoyed by the masses, to include amateurs, pros, and social shooters. He must be doing something right because it appears that his business entities get stronger each year.

Dragon events do profit, thanks to PoolGrapevine, et al. They have not been as friendly to the pool public as other events, from what I have read on this forum, charging players' wives extra fees to sit ringside to see their husbands play pool, as an example. But, hey, you gotta do what you gotta do to turn a profit, even if it means not treating everyone the same way you treat the favorites within the organization.

I don't know much about the Seminole events, but everything I hear is good. It's ironic because Native American culture is a passion of mine. I was planning on attending a Seminole tournament in August, but it's still up in the air. I might have to work overtime that month. There's a lot of things going on in D.C. that are providing me work opportunities right now, and I will never put pool ahead of my livelihood again. :smile:
 
The events mentioned here as being profitable all have one thing in common: amateurs.

You take away the amateur events at any of these events and they disappear. Immediately. The pro events are basically added value to spectators, amateur players and somewhat of a promotional tool. I know for a fact that they could ditch the pro events at the BCAPL Nationals, put bar tables in the space and make more money. I suspect the pro event at SBE could go away and it wouldn't miss a beat revenue wise. The thing is promoters like Mark Griffin and Allen Hopkins like pro pool and pro pool players so they support it.

The bottom line is that if current pro tournament model's were financially viable and profitable you would see big events every weekend. The thing that kills profitability at pro events is added money. It eats all your profits. You have to have a big enough venue to fit a gate that will help recoup the added money but now you have to either pay for that space or make a room guarantee with a hotel, then you have to pay to promote and sell those seats. Its a catch 22. Without a serious sponsor you have no shot to make it.

If the ABP really wants to build something they should do the following:

You can find space and tables if you are flexible so do that and have all the APB members show up and play for free. Allow non members to enter for fee. Take all profits from the gate, streaming, merchandise and sponsorships and use THAT for the prize fund. Eat what you kill. Now you have just taken control of your own destiny. The value and marketability of your product will dictate how much money the players make. No more relying on outside forces for rules, seeding, or timely payment.

This gives membership in the organization true value. It would make being a ABP pro mean something tangible. The members who do not help out or show up face penalties. IF the commitment was proven it wouldn't take long for a lot of people to jump on board and support it. It wouldn't take but two or three years and I suspect the organization would be recognized by world bodies meaning now the points rankings have real value as well.

It could start as small as events in pool rooms. I doubt you would have any problems finding quality rooms that would make fair deals to have the APB roster show up for a weekend. Then its just up to the organization to put asses in the seats. If they really want to control their own destiny its the only way forward. Every member would have a tangible stake in the organization.

Now the down side: It would require unprecedented cooperation and communication between the players. It would also be a metric shit ton of work and it probably wouldn't pay very well in the beginning. Just like almost every viable enterprise that has ever been created.

Unless and until they start generating their own prize funds they are going to be subject to dealing with the people who do. Threatening those people will not get them where they want to be.
 
Last edited:
Are you saying that Greg Sullivan takes a bath every year on the Derby? I wasn't aware that was a charity affair.

He has had good years and bad years. Having the balls to keep an event running after taking a beating is something that should be rewarded in the good years.
 
The events mentioned here as being profitable all have one thing in common: amateurs.

You take away the amateur events at any of these events and they disappear. Immediately. The pro events are basically added value to spectators, amateur players and somewhat of a promotional tool. I know for a fact that they could ditch the pro events at the BCAPL Nationals, put bar tables in the space and make more money. I suspect the pro event at SBE could go away and it wouldn't miss a beat revenue wise. The thing is promoters like Mark Griffin and Allen Hopkins like pro pool and pro pool players so they support it.

The bottom line is that if current pro tournament model's were financially viable and profitable you would see big events every weekend. The thing that kills profitability at pro events is added money. It eats all your profits. You have to have a big enough venue to fit a gate that will help recoup the added money but now you have to either pay for that space or make a room guarantee with a hotel, then you have to pay to promote and sell those seats. Its a catch 22. Without a serious sponsor you have no shot to make it.

If the ABP really wants to build something they should do the following:

You can find space and tables if you are flexible so do that and have all the APB members show up and play for free. Allow non members to enter for fee. Take all profits from the gate, streaming, merchandise and sponsorships and use THAT for the prize fund. Eat what you kill. Now you have just taken control of your own destiny. The value and marketability of your product will dictate how much money the players make. No more relying on outside forces for rules, seeding, or timely payment.

This gives membership in the organization true value. It would make being a ABP pro mean something tangible. The members who do not help out or show up face penalties. IF the commitment was proven it wouldn't take long for a lot of people to jump on board and support it. It wouldn't take but two or three years and I suspect the organization would be recognized by world bodies meaning now the points rankings have real value as well.

It could start as small as events in pool rooms. I doubt you would have any problems finding quality rooms that would make fair deals to have the APB roster show up for a weekend. Then its just up to the organization to put asses in the seats. If they really want to control their own destiny its the only way forward. Every member would have a tangible stake in the organization.

Now the down side: It would require unprecedented cooperation and communication between the players. It would also be a metric shit ton of work and it probably wouldn't pay very well in the beginning. Just like almost every viable enterprise that has ever been created.

Unless and until they start generating their own prize funds they are going to be subject to dealing with the people who do. Threatening those people will not get them where they want to be.

Brother, you said a mouthful!

Brian in VA
 
Thanks for all the responses. Everyone has confirmed what I suspected. The first really large tournament I went to was the Galveston World Classic and it was a huge eye opener for me in regards to the futility of large pool tournaments. The organizers really love the game and put in a ton of effort and money and just lost their shirt.

I had a conversation with an individual who is interested in promoting pool and has some money to spend when he asked me about a tournament I tried to talk him out of it. I suggested challenge matches.

I think TAR has the right idea. Big tournaments are not sustainable models. Having single matches similar to boxing and available for streaming is the future of pool in my opinion.
 
Back
Top