Question about using BHE

Patrick,

This is a foolish argument on both our parts.

1. I agree with you that parallel english is not true english. It is a contrivance for changing the angle of attack with the cue ball, e.g., when an interfering cushion or ball blocks a regular center ball stroke.

2. BHE with a swoop provides subtle effects on many shot angles, something that can make its advantages hard to discern even if you've tried it. This is one reason why there are many fine players who argue against its use, including yourself.

I suggest, however, using object balls for cue balls. Stroke 6 or 7 stripes into a distant corner pocket, and alternate. First, set up center ball than move the back hand for english as you suggest. Do the same on alternate balls but stroke with a swoop on the final forward stroke.

The BHE with swoop will provide a bit more spin at medium speed and less cue ball curve with a near-level stroke; the cue ball will find center pocket more so than the regular english strokes. This is why BHE swoop players say they can forget about curve and squirt on aiming at object balls with english on certain swiping strokes.

The reason why is because it is truly a different angle of attack on the ball. You are correct regarding english, squirt and the same stroke in the same place, however, you can hit one tip of left english or hit the same spot on the cue ball with one tip of left english and a cue elevated 20 degrees, which will provide more cue ball curve and is a different angle of attack, of course.

There are a variety of subtle twists you or I can put on the cue stick that provide hitting different portions of the tip along the cue ball, e.g. watching a newbie hit draw successfully for the first time when you suggest they try to strike vertically below center ball with the top section of the cue tip instead of reaching to put the center of the tip on the ball and thus scooping the ball into the air with the ferrule because they lunge at the ball.

Having said that, personally, I use swooping strokes rarely. You are a good enough player that you don't need to employ them, but fire bombing people who do seems wrong when you can see them on TV with fine players constantly.

I'll let you have the final word in this debate. Thank you.
 
Guys, I've made it clear several times now.

If you intend to participate in aiming threads, you will be expected to add constructively to the conversation or stay out of it.
If you want to start your own thread expressing the reasons you disagree with whatever principal, do so however it will be kept civil at all times.

Patric needs a break.

If people don't start being more civil, the length of these breaks will take a dramatic increase.

Mr. Wilson, sorry, saw your 7:45 AM post after I finished composing my post minutes later this morning.

I will let PJ have the last word in this argument as I wrote and I hope he will likewise be civil to others. He is highly learned in pool but sometimes brutal to aspiring players.
 
If PJ is banned, why doesn't it say "banned" under his name? Has the ban been lifted already? I hope he's not banned, because I wanted to jump in here and tell him that I respectfully disagree with him on the actual effects of parallel and backhand english (I tend to agree with Matt on the matter). I was looking forward to a productive and civil discussion.

So Patrick, if you're still here, come on back and let's discuss.

Roger
 
I'll go ahead and add my two cents on the matter.

I use BHE on occasion, and have become pretty proficient with it over time. I don't understand the physics of it at all. All I know is that on certain shots, it has allowed me to pocket the ball and get shape that I otherwise would have had trouble getting.

Is it possible to get the same result using regular english (parallel?)?

Sure, I don't see why not, but BHE makes it so much easier for me. I'm all for anything that makes this game a little less difficult.
 
I reconsidered the length of the ban.


PJ isn't just some troll. He does have alot to offer. He needs to understand that there is more to consider than just his opinion.

I want there to be no mistake about how serious I am that there will be civility in these discussions.

If I am left with no other alternative, then bans will be the option.
 
I reconsidered the length of the ban.


PJ isn't just some troll. He does have alot to offer. He needs to understand that there is more to consider than just his opinion.

I want there to be no mistake about how serious I am that there will be civility in these discussions.

If I am left with no other alternative, then bans will be the option.
To help me understand, please quote something I said here that offended your sense of civility.

pj
chgo
 
Just be glad your back,I think some people we're in tears cause you was gone .I know I was.:smile:
 
For the longest time I didn't know you was real Pj,I thought you was a generated forum member.Put here just in case we all got to stupid,you would show up to save the day with your wisdom.:D
 
To help me understand, please quote something I said here that offended your sense of civility.

pj
chgo

#48 and 50.
After I re-read the entire thread, I reconsidered.

The cumulative effect of previous enounters is what triggered the ban.

Would you suggest that you are not argumentative and abrase, or that we haven't had many conversations about civility in general?

BTW, my reconsidering the length of the ban isn't to say that I agree with you only that 1 day was enough and should serve as the most severe warning I can offer without making the ban longer.

It should also serve as notice to others who wish to be less than civil, as aiming threads have become the new NPR standard for rude, argumentative people.
 
#48 and 50.
Really? I thought I was pretty restrained in those posts. But I understand your next point:

The cumulative effect of previous enounters is what triggered the ban.
This is what I figured - my "ban by" date came up.

Would you suggest that you are not argumentative and abrase, or that we haven't had many conversations about civility in general?
We have different perspectives. Factuality and candidness are important to me; peace in the valley is important to you. You might see these forums as chat rooms, while I see their true value as learning resources.

I think there are times when it's necessary to be rude to be truthful - for instance when a claim is so ridiculous that "politely debating" it lends it undeserved credibility and is actually misleading. I'll have to choose between what I see as serving truth and dodging the axe - so I'll undoubtedly get the axe again eventually. C'est la vie.

After I re-read the entire thread, I reconsidered.
I appreciate the time and effort this took, and that moderating is a thankless task. Sorry to be a thorn in your side, but it's what I am.

pj
chgo
 
Last edited:
I respectfully disagree with him on the actual effects of parallel and backhand english (I tend to agree with Matt on the matter). I was looking forward to a productive and civil discussion.

So Patrick, if you're still here, come on back and let's discuss.

Roger
Fire away, Roger. Since you're not advertising yourself as the second coming of Christ (yet), we might be able to get along. What's on your mind?

pj
chgo
 
parallel?

What would U guys call it when a shot is lined up to cut an OB on the foot spot with the CB on the head 'spot' and then the entire cue stick (tip & butt) is moved laterally to the side from center. I have always heard it called parallel english. However, if shot as decribed on a snooker table the ball would probably not be pocketed. To pocket the ball, the stick would probably need to be more 'parallel' to the line it would deflect on if the shot was shot 'parallel' to a center hit line. That might counter the swerve.

Too much vernacular to mis-understand for me.

My swoop shot is not 'your' swoop shot. Mine is much bigger on an open bridge. More like one would shoot one handed with no bridge. I think the CB spins more with a little less forward momentum & with less deflection swerve. I only shoot it when requiered for postion.
 
ENGLISH!:
What would U guys call it when a shot is lined up to cut an OB on the foot spot with the CB on the head 'spot' and then the entire cue stick (tip & butt) is moved laterally to the side from center.
Except on the rare occasion that squirt and swerve exactly cancel each other, I call it a miss.

pj
chgo
 
...I think there are times when it's necessary to be rude to be truthful - for instance when a claim is so ridiculous that "politely debating" it lends it undeserved credibility and is actually misleading. I'll have to choose between what I see as serving truth and dodging the axe - so I'll undoubtedly get the axe again eventually. C'est la vie.


I appreciate the time and effort this took, and that moderating is a thankless task. Sorry to be a thorn in your side, but it's what I am.

pj
chgo

You can count me as one who is very grateful that PJ is around. I'm one of many on this forum that are unable to explain the technical details of this game that we love BUT it is abundantly clear to me when I see the truth. There are some on here that lack the humility to admit that they are wrong or ignorant when it comes to certain subjects. In my estimation, it's even worse when someone who lacks this understanding speaks with such authority.

These types of posters deserve to be smacked upside the head with the truth from time to time.
 
i know for a fact that this person you are talking about has made wrong and ignorant claims on here also, so becareful when you make claims like that... i am just saying and I don't want to start anything.
 
i know for a fact that this person you are talking about has made wrong and ignorant claims on here also, so becareful when you make claims like that... i am just saying and I don't want to start anything.
Champ2107, it's against forum rules to sneak back as a sockpuppet when you've been banned. It could result in a lifetime ban (if you don't already have that).

pj
chgo
 
Champ2107, it's against forum rules to sneak back as a sockpuppet when you've been banned. It could result in a lifetime ban (if you don't already have that).

pj
chgo

feel free to pm mr wilson about this issue PJ. I know poolsharkallen has reported this issue to Az already. I just wanted to make things clear and correct the misinformation posted by basementdweller just like "you always say you do on here". I meant nothing personal by that post that has gotten you but hurt.

ps: is it possible that someone that has a banned account was never banned?
 
Back
Top