Regarding the age-old argument concerning "call pocket" games versus "slop counts" games, I want to ask this question.
Would it be feasible to have a professional tournament where the standard rule of "slop counts" is in place but if the two opponents agree before their match to play a "call pocket" match (or vice-versa), then they could be allowed to do so? Would this be a nightmare for the referees? Too confusing for the players?
The stipulation of course would be that BOTH players had to agree beforehand on which format to use (and in a timely fashion) otherwise the tournament appointed rules would be in place (whichever those may be).
This way if two amatuers are paired up, they could play the "slop counts" rule and if two seasoned professionals are paired up, they may choose to use the "call pocket" rule.
Is this just a dumb question or could this have any possibility of working???
Maniac
Would it be feasible to have a professional tournament where the standard rule of "slop counts" is in place but if the two opponents agree before their match to play a "call pocket" match (or vice-versa), then they could be allowed to do so? Would this be a nightmare for the referees? Too confusing for the players?
The stipulation of course would be that BOTH players had to agree beforehand on which format to use (and in a timely fashion) otherwise the tournament appointed rules would be in place (whichever those may be).
This way if two amatuers are paired up, they could play the "slop counts" rule and if two seasoned professionals are paired up, they may choose to use the "call pocket" rule.
Is this just a dumb question or could this have any possibility of working???
Maniac
Last edited: