snowmon34 said:Heres another example of a sissy not maning up....talk about zero entertainment value..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANFHy-VeJxI
That was awesome! I love it, haha, ok I changed my mind, soft break is the sh*t.
snowmon34 said:Heres another example of a sissy not maning up....talk about zero entertainment value..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANFHy-VeJxI
Luxury said:Raj was not sitting at a bar whining about losing to a bunch of his peers.
He clearly had an agenda to tape an interview as a plea to the guys in charge to make the sport he loves better. He made it controversial enough to get it aired to the masses so clearly his plan worked.
Imagine how many people complained when the forward pass was introduced in American football when they normally just played smashmouth running plays. "That's sissy football." certainly must have been one phrase uttered frequently. Guess what. They made football probably twice as entertaining.
In my opinion it's okay to change rules around to make a certain sport more entertaining and the NFL does it all the time to encourage more passing etc.
Was Raj dissing his opponent? Yes. Did Raj think he had been sharked by his opponent? Yes. Have we ever dissed our opponents after they sharked us or made a move on us? Yes.
frankncali said:So he only wants it his way ?????
The best putters in Golf would love to shorten the course and the longer hitters would lover to make it longer. However they adapt while mastering what THEY are good at.
Why take give him an advantage while taking a cut breakers advantage away. No logic there.
Someone needs to figure out a way to give each guy equal chances at doing something. No one to blame but themselves that way.
CueSportTV said:Responding to 'LUXURY' above
Raj has yet to win a tournament on the newly formed GB 9 Ball Tour. Of the six events so far Imran has won 4 of them, with Raj finishing runner-up to Imran in two of them.
OK so the GB9 is not high profile but when everyone says there is not enough money for these players in pool, then why give up the opportunity to win, in this case $2400?
Both players are very talented and play some fantastic pool, Imran just has an advantage by choosing to use the cut break.
Luxury said:Again. Besides the English accent Raj was very clear as to why he chose not to use the cutbreak in this small to him tourney. He wants to keep his power break in stroke for bigger tournaments. He knows better than anyone what is best for his master plan. So everyone who says he should have used the cut break was just stating their opinion. No way to know who is right.
Cuebacca said:That's his prerogative, but Raj doesn't need to berate an opponent just because he isn't willing to put himself at a disadvantage like Raj is. There are various games and various breaks. Sometimes the same game may favor a different break depending on the conditions. It should, in theory, be possible to use one break without losing the ability to proficiently use another one later.
At the DCC, if I'm not mistaken, the 9-ball could be going on while the one-pocket still isn't over. If Raj found himself in that situation, would he power break in a one-pocket game to stay in stroke for an upcoming 9-ball match?JMHO.
fasteddienc said:I agree that you should use what you know to to win legally. This is similar to the jump cue argument where some players like Earl think they should not allow use of jump cues. But there is no rule that says he can't go out and buy one himself. In fact, a man that can jump full cue will probably be even deadlier with it. So why not get off the ego trip and follow the lead??? If the cut break and jump cues are such an advantage why wouldn't you use them to your advantage???
A. Because you don't want to win
B. Because you don't know how to accept that others are smarter than you
C. You are too stubborn and egotistical to adapt to change!!