ericdraven said:ummm where do you live ,and where are these pawn shops ???![]()
![]()
TATE said:Craig,
no doubt this cue is genuine. I am pretty sure it's been refinished, however, but a long time ago.
Chris
Mr Hoppe said:I hope he doesn't mind, but another AZer owns the Rambow cue below and I'm posting the signature to be used for comparison. Since this thread in particular is asking for opinions, I have a couple of questions and would like to learn something. I own no Rambow cues, and know nothing about how to authenticate one, however here is something I noticed.
1) All of the cues posted except the original poster's have the "squiggles" around the signature.
2) I was then looking at some of the lettering and notice that the 's' in the original poster's signature is significantly different from two of the others posted, the one below, and J Marshall's example.
3) The 'a' in James is very slightly different than those in Tate's example. Could be a normal deviation.
4) The "squiggles" surrounding the signature of John Marsharl's signature are different from Tate's and the example below, which are similar.
I'm not trying to cast any doubts here, I just wonder, did Herman Rambow ever have someone else sign these cues for him? And, is there anyone who has enough examples to verify the above inconsistencies?
![]()
Mr Hoppe said:I hope he doesn't mind, but another AZer owns the Rambow cue below and I'm posting the signature to be used for comparison. Since this thread in particular is asking for opinions, I have a couple of questions and would like to learn something. I own no Rambow cues, and know nothing about how to authenticate one, however here is something I noticed.
1) All of the cues posted except the original poster's have the "squiggles" around the signature.
2) I was then looking at some of the lettering and notice that the 's' in the original poster's signature is significantly different from two of the others posted, the one below, and J Marshall's example.
3) The 'a' in James is very slightly different than those in Tate's example. Could be a normal deviation.
4) The "squiggles" surrounding the signature of John Marsharl's signature are different from Tate's and the example below, which are similar.
I'm not trying to cast any doubts here, I just wonder, did Herman Rambow ever have someone else sign these cues for him? And, is there anyone who has enough examples to verify the above inconsistencies?
![]()
Hey There,Phylo said:I recently purchased this cue in a pawn shop. I don't play nearly as much as I used to, but I knew that this was a high quality piece, the price was right, and I bought it.
There is no maker's name on it, but after some internet research, it looked to have the earmarks of a Herman Rambow.
I sent pictures to a man who is known and respected on this board and in pool circles (I won't quote him by name without his okay). He said that it appears to be a Rambow built in the mid 60's, ivory butt, Cortland wrap.
Here's the link to photos:
http://s263.photobucket.com/albums/ii152/meridian_t/
The first thumbnail is a slide show that is kind of annoying, the others are still photos.
I'll probably be selling this cue, but I'd like to find out more about it first. This is far more stick than I need, and it should be in the hands of a better and more deserving player than me!
I welcome your comments, questions, and opinions.