rodney morris v greg hogue, 9-ball 10k match

You got action G.S. nothing huge but being a 660 I think it'd be a good time.
Which part of the US you in?
Plus I'm 74 yr young.
I can do Nashville , Vegas , Charlotte NC . What game you like ? I like 9ft tight pocket 9ball and one pocket .
 
Colorado...
10 ball tight.... 4 1/2 not 1/4
Cue ball/my choice.
 
Last edited:
I’m in Texas but I can be anywhere, preferably South of the Mason Dixon Line . BTW I’m 53 and you got action sir ! Where are you
I'm pretty sure I'm allowed to root for old guys.

Regardless, it saddens me I don't have the game to counter your woofing. Seems like I need to eat it.

BTW, 53 is a kid.
 
I know 2 guys who played a set to 25 for a good amount and there was about 35 points difference in their Fargo and the lower rated player won. Maybe not to shocking that the lower rated player won. However they played 10 ball so no slop counted. Also the lower rated player won easily I don’t remember the exact score but it was like 25-11.
The thing to keep in mind with fargo is that it is a LAGGING indicator. When a person improves their game, it takes time for their rating to reflect that improvement.
 
The thing to keep in mind with fargo is that it is a LAGGING indicator. When a person improves their game, it takes time for their rating to reflect that improvement.
So if they play again you would bet on the lower Fargo and give games on the wire?

I don't think you will because you realize that 1 match may have been a abomination.
 
So if they play again you would bet on the lower Fargo and give games on the wire?

I don't think you will because you realize that 1 match may have been a abomination.
Ok, maybe my post was unclear, so I will try to do better since you appear to need some help.
I was referring to a match that someone else referenced (not hogue vs rodney).
I pointed out that Fargo ratings are a LAGGING indicator (feel free to Google search lagging indicator).
What I didn't mention is that young players tend to have big gains in skill level in short periods of time and are frequently under-rated because Fargo is a lagging indicator (consider this a bonus for you).
I hope this clears up any misunderstandings you have.
 
Wow that escalated quick . Rodney took the us open many times hard to beat a world class player and a gambler with Hawaiian Bryan and one of the hard times originals from back in the days .That's crazy to risk that much against a world class legend like Rodney I seen him before as a kid was some good shooting congratulations Rodney Morris when he playing Corey duel ready to see that.peace
 
The thing to keep in mind with fargo is that it is a LAGGING indicator. When a person improves their game, it takes time for their rating to reflect that improvement.
I just checked their Fargo again and they are 32 points different. One player has over 2000 games in the system and the other over 6000 games in the system.
 
So if they play again you would bet on the lower Fargo and give games on the wire?

I don't think you will because you realize that 1 match may have been a abomination.
So try and keep up( don't lag behind) you didn't disclose the information that the lower rated player had became a much stronger player then their fargo#. So if this is the case and you have faith in the lagging Fargo phenomenon you would actually bet on the lower rated player and concede games on the wire?

I mean you aren't a nit and would only what to correct the injustice brought up by on the lagging fargo,right?
 
So try and keep up( don't lag behind) you didn't disclose the information that the lower rated player had became a much stronger player then their fargo#. So if this is the case and you have faith in the lagging Fargo phenomenon you would actually bet on the lower rated player and concede games on the wire?

I mean you aren't a nit and would only what to correct the injustice brought up by on the lagging fargo,right?
You should stick to APA.
 
Back
Top