I can do Nashville , Vegas , Charlotte NC . What game you like ? I like 9ft tight pocket 9ball and one pocket .You got action G.S. nothing huge but being a 660 I think it'd be a good time.
Which part of the US you in?
Plus I'm 74 yr young.
I can do Nashville , Vegas , Charlotte NC . What game you like ? I like 9ft tight pocket 9ball and one pocket .You got action G.S. nothing huge but being a 660 I think it'd be a good time.
Which part of the US you in?
Plus I'm 74 yr young.
I'm pretty sure I'm allowed to root for old guys.I’m in Texas but I can be anywhere, preferably South of the Mason Dixon Line . BTW I’m 53 and you got action sir ! Where are you
The thing to keep in mind with fargo is that it is a LAGGING indicator. When a person improves their game, it takes time for their rating to reflect that improvement.I know 2 guys who played a set to 25 for a good amount and there was about 35 points difference in their Fargo and the lower rated player won. Maybe not to shocking that the lower rated player won. However they played 10 ball so no slop counted. Also the lower rated player won easily I don’t remember the exact score but it was like 25-11.
So if they play again you would bet on the lower Fargo and give games on the wire?The thing to keep in mind with fargo is that it is a LAGGING indicator. When a person improves their game, it takes time for their rating to reflect that improvement.
Ok, maybe my post was unclear, so I will try to do better since you appear to need some help.So if they play again you would bet on the lower Fargo and give games on the wire?
I don't think you will because you realize that 1 match may have been a abomination.
A 750 maybeLet’s pretend it was 1996. Efren, Earl, and Busty are tops Fargo tied at 835. What would you rate Rodney?
Way too low. Rodney might have been the best road player out there for a few years before he won the U.S. Open. He would have eaten a lot of 750 Fargo players for breakfast. My guess is the higher end that was posted before, around 795-805.A 750 maybe
I just checked their Fargo again and they are 32 points different. One player has over 2000 games in the system and the other over 6000 games in the system.The thing to keep in mind with fargo is that it is a LAGGING indicator. When a person improves their game, it takes time for their rating to reflect that improvement.
Be careful, he's about to start teaching you about lagging indicators...I just checked their Fargo again and they are 32 points different. One player has over 2000 games in the system and the other over 6000 games in the system.
Trust me I know about lagging indicators, nothing lags behind more than my brain does.Be careful, he's about to start teaching you about lagging indicators...
So try and keep up( don't lag behind) you didn't disclose the information that the lower rated player had became a much stronger player then their fargo#. So if this is the case and you have faith in the lagging Fargo phenomenon you would actually bet on the lower rated player and concede games on the wire?So if they play again you would bet on the lower Fargo and give games on the wire?
I don't think you will because you realize that 1 match may have been a abomination.
You should stick to APA.So try and keep up( don't lag behind) you didn't disclose the information that the lower rated player had became a much stronger player then their fargo#. So if this is the case and you have faith in the lagging Fargo phenomenon you would actually bet on the lower rated player and concede games on the wire?
I mean you aren't a nit and would only what to correct the injustice brought up by on the lagging fargo,right?
From what I read on this site APA handicapping doesn't lag behind. Since you have issue with said lag maybe you have found your Eldorado.You should stick to APA.