Question:
Ronnie someone is saying you stiffed shane vanboening at dcc last year too and if that's correct then you have a history of stiffing so is it true?
Answer:
I played shane in Reno and I had a backer for the set. My backer ended up playin dice and lost everything including the stake money. I ended up losing to Shane but told him I would make it right I just needed time. I didn't have to do that because my backer was responsible for the bet but, it was the right thing to do. I paid shane back at the derby city classic. I didn't stiff him, my backer did but I did payoff the debt.
Questions posted by azers!
1. What else can 'stand good' mean. It means if the other guy doesn't pay, then you are guaranteeing that you will pay.
Answer: I stood good for scott because scott said he was good for the money. He said he had a lot of money on him so I vouched for him to be someone that would pay if he lost. I was honestly only doing it because I wanted shawn to hurry up and play the set with me because it was taking forever dealing with the side action crap.
I did make that mistake!
2. In the original thread, Shawn said Scott quit when he got ten games down, and gave the money to Ronnie (6 witnesses). Shawn then asked to 'square the penny' and Ronnie refused. This sounds like Scott lost 10 games, gave the money to Ronnie, and instead of paying Shawn, Ronnie used that money to keep on gambling. That would make Ronnie owe the whole enchilada.
Answer: First of all, scott lost and owes 3400! I had zero part of that side action. Scott never quit when he was 10 games down that part of the initial story was wrong that's why I'm setting it straight! Scott and shawn will admit that to everyone! He never got off the bet!
There were no witnesses to scott giving me money, there were 6 people that were told he gave me money but no one saw that because it was just me and scott! Scott did give me some money that night BUT he owed me the money from another bet. He was paying me back and that's what I kept betting per game with. It was not intended to square any side action and scott will attest to that!! Shawn had no idea and was assuming a lot of things about that night because he didn't get paid what he won off of the side bet which again, I had no part of!
There were a lot of untruths in that original post and like I said before, shawn only did it to pressure me into helping him get his money!! Yes I did owe him the last 500 I bet but I did tell him I'd pay and I have!! I never had any part of the sideaction and never shouldve let them use a coin on the table to keep score because then I wouldn't be here answering these questions and wouldn't be accused of this!
The only thing I did that night was make a mistake by allowing a coin on the table to track the side action........standing good for a guy because he said he had money and yes, not paying the last 500 I lost but I did tell shawn I'd pay him and I have! I haven't done everything else being thrown at me and its ashame that people are making judegments about that night from reading a post full of untruths from a guy they don't know and when they weren't there. This is the truth now.........believe it or not but I've set the record straight!
Ronnie wanted me to add that he thanks shawn for manning up and posting the apology but wish it had been more detailed so the truth was actually known by all. Ronnie also made mention that he's been told to sue shawn for defamation of character and az for allowing such slnderous things to be posted. He said he had no intentions of suing either. He just wants the truth to be told and to go on with his life!
