Rules question??

tigerseye said:
It was a legitimate question. I did find out through this that you can't use your stick either to line up shots....I see that reguarly...Now if i see it i can call a foul and win the game due to the knowledge of the rules...lol:grin:
This needs clarification, you can use your stick to line up a shot, however, you CAN NOT lay your stick down on the table and take your hand off of it.
 
etimmons said:
Sorry but no foul, rule has changed...Also please look up the rules before making statements that are not true. Thank you Earl Timmons BCA ref


Better yet, we can start a recurring thread about rules and call it, "Just ask Earl." How's that sound?

Jay Helfert, tournament director
 
questions

jay helfert said:
Nope, sorry. Unless the BCA changed this rule too. :)

If you have qball in hand can you use it to see if a ball fits between the rail and another ball. I have seen this done several times. Is it a foul?
 
supergreenman said:
This needs clarification, you can use your stick to line up a shot, however, you CAN NOT lay your stick down on the table and take your hand off of it.


The rule is specific for a player in the act of aiming. If a referee calls this foul on you and you weren't aiming, you should protest to the head referee. If you're tying your shoe or getting the bridge, it's perfectly acceptable to lay your cue on the table while doing so.
 
etimmons said:
Sorry but no foul, rule has changed...Also please look up the rules before making statements that are not true. Thank you Earl Timmons BCA ref

That's great, Rodney Morris will be very pleased. Now he can go back in time and have that ruling reversed. :rolleyes:

Rep for someone who can refresh my memory on what tournament I'm thinking of.
 
just about a said:
If you have qball in hand can you use it to see if a ball fits between the rail and another ball. I have seen this done several times. Is it a foul?

Almost anything goes with BIH. You can always say you are looking for a place to put the cue ball.
 
No

just about a said:
If you have qball in hand can you use it to see if a ball fits between the rail and another ball. I have seen this done several times. Is it a foul?
NO-NO-&NO:thumbup:
 
i KNOW

tigerseye said:
It was a legitimate question. I did find out through this that you can't use your stick either to line up shots....I see that reguarly...Now if i see it i can call a foul and win the game due to the knowledge of the rules...lol:grin:
iM NOT SAYING THE QUESTION WAS NOT LAGET, IM WONDEREING IF YOU AND HALF THE PLAYERS THAT POST HERE HAVE REALY READ A RULE BOOK??? BEING THE PLAYER IS THE ONE THAT IS TO CALL THE FOUL, IF YOU DONT KNOW YOU ARE AT A DISAVANTAGE!!!:grin-square: :grin-square: :grin-square:
 
To stop myself missing easy shots I started walking behind shots and putting chalk on the rail after chalking. It is on or near the line, but doesn't serve a purpose of cheating when aiming. For example, I'm shooting a ball into the left side pocket, I would put the chalk by the right side after I chalked. Anyone think this is a foul? I played one guy that didn't like it, he didn't call anything though.
 
It's not a foul in any rule book I have READ. But it can cause a foul if the cue ball jumps the rail and hits the chalk and goes back on the table. Again you must specify whose rules you are using when asking a question. I'm constantly amazed by watching guys playing for money not only don't specify whose rules they are playing by, they don't seem to know the rules of any book. Still the money flows.
 
Moronix said:
It's not a foul in any rule book I have READ. But it can cause a foul if the cue ball jumps the rail and hits the chalk and goes back on the table. Again you must specify whose rules you are using when asking a question. I'm constantly amazed by watching guys playing for money not only don't specify whose rules they are playing by, they don't seem to know the rules of any book. Still the money flows.

I always thought it could hit the chalk, it was considered part of the rail or something. Mostly BCA rules
 
stick8 said:
iM NOT SAYING THE QUESTION WAS NOT LAGET, IM WONDEREING IF YOU AND HALF THE PLAYERS THAT POST HERE HAVE REALY READ A RULE BOOK??? BEING THE PLAYER IS THE ONE THAT IS TO CALL THE FOUL, IF YOU DONT KNOW YOU ARE AT A DISAVANTAGE!!!:grin-square: :grin-square: :grin-square:


I guess i have obeyed the rules of pool without reading the book on pool...
I am gonna say that 90% of azer's have never read the book of pool rules...
There are all kinds of rules to play by and it is a shame that we cannot come to a final conclusion on what the rules should be...
Start a poll and lets see what happens=)
 
tigerseye said:
I guess i have obeyed the rules of pool without reading the book on pool...
I am gonna say that 90% of azer's have never read the book of pool rules...
There are all kinds of rules to play by and it is a shame that we cannot come to a final conclusion on what the rules should be...
Start a poll and lets see what happens=)

One other little problem with this. The powers that be are constantly twicking (spell check) the rules and fiddling with them, making changes that sometimes defy logic. It all becomes a little bit of a willy nilly attempt to control the play of a game that needs less rules and not more. A few better written rules would govern many situations that are now covered by multiple current rules.

Just like this deal about setting your cue on the table. Who knows what the rule is this year? Probably only the guys who wrote (or rewrote) it most recently.
 
Last edited:
Ditto!!!

jay helfert said:
One other little problem with this. The powers that be are constantly twicking (spell check) the rules and fiddling with them, making changes that sometimes defy logic. It all becomes a little bit of a willy nilly attempt to control the play of a game that needs less rules and not more. A few better written rules would govern many situations that are now covered by multiple current rules.

Just like this deal about setting your cue on the table. Who knows what the rule is this year? Probably only the guys who wrote (or rewrote) it most recently.
I agree JAY , as there to many rules to play by, and to many rewrites, need one govering body. but as a old traveling TD as yoursef i allways had with me a printed copy of TEXAS EXPRESS RULES that i announced that they we the one used in my tournements. and you better know them and i will say again it up to the player to call fouls and if he dont no the rules HE BAD.:confused: :confused: :boring2: :wink: :wink: :wink:
 
Sorry....but No

Jason Robichaud said:
I always thought it could hit the chalk, it was considered part of the rail or something. Mostly BCA rules

The BCAPL Rules are

Anything on a rail (Chalk, pocket marker, tip scuffer, etc.) that isn't a part of the rail is considered a foreign object. If a ball goes onto a rail and contacts any foreign object...it's a foul.

That's why if there is any chalk on the rail, I remove it or move it to the head rail if I am breaking
 
ne14tennis said:
The BCAPL Rules are

Anything on a rail (Chalk, pocket marker, tip scuffer, etc.) that isn't a part of the rail is considered a foreign object. If a ball goes onto a rail and contacts any foreign object...it's a foul.

That's why if there is any chalk on the rail, I remove it or move it to the head rail if I am breaking


I have seen just about everything in pool except ball hitting chalk on the rail. Never seen a ball leave a table hit something and come back to playing surface (I have seen a guy jump ball off table and pocket a ball on another table). I have learned the rules by situations in games and then finding it in the rule book. I did read a BCA rule book about 2 years ago, probably time to read it again.
 
Jason Robichaud said:
I have seen just about everything in pool except ball hitting chalk on the rail. Never seen a ball leave a table hit something and come back to playing surface (I have seen a guy jump ball off table and pocket a ball on another table). I have learned the rules by situations in games and then finding it in the rule book. I did read a BCA rule book about 2 years ago, probably time to read it again.


Me too, although I have seen a player knock a piece of chalk onto the table, and a ball hit it. FOUL!
 
etimmons said:
Sorry but no foul, rule has changed...Also please look up the rules before making statements that are not true. Thank you Earl Timmons BCA ref

Where would we go to look up the latest rules? According to BCA's website:

6.12 Cue Stick on the Table
If the shooter uses his cue stick in order to align a shot by placing it on the table without having a hand on the stick, it is a foul.

But I'm not BCA ref.
 
Jason Robichaud said:
I have seen just about everything in pool except ball hitting chalk on the rail. Never seen a ball leave a table hit something and come back to playing surface (I have seen a guy jump ball off table and pocket a ball on another table).
I successfully completed a jump shot during a tournament several years back... but it was certainly weird. Here's what happened. The CB jumped over the impeding ball... then struck the OB I was aiming at on the fly. The OB was fairly close to a side rail... so when the CB stuck it on the fly, the OB bounced off of the table bed and onto the top of the side rail, which was slightly crowned... and then it slowly rolled its way down the rail towards the corner pocket (where I was aiming to make it)... and the OB rolled all the way into the pocket, never returning back onto the table bed. Now that was a helluva shot!!! :rotflmao:
 
shakes said:
Where would we go to look up the latest rules? According to BCA's website:

6.12 Cue Stick on the Table
If the shooter uses his cue stick in order to align a shot by placing it on the table without having a hand on the stick, it is a foul.

But I'm not BCA ref.

This post makes me smile. :smile:
 
Back
Top