Saturday: Semifinals of 2013 U.S. Open 9-Ball Championship

[adrianbrah]

Yeah i think he will. Shane is one sick human being...

 

[JAM]

Jim is now interviewing Shane. He says he got some funny rolls, but it went his ways. Shane and Jayson roommates at this tournament. Not much conversation there. Shane packs up to leave the table.

Now we wait for Van-Van and Niels. Whjy can't they move the camera over there?

Oh, man, they did. YAY! :happydance::happydance::happydance:

6-5, Van-Van and Niels. We can see, but not commentary. I like this. Thank you, Accu-Stats.

 

[lukemindish]

From what I saw from the live scoring, Shane was down 4-1 and finished the set 10-1....soooooooo strong

 

[JAM]

So will Shane have to lose two matches this evening since it is a double elimination tourny?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk - now Free

No, it's an extended race to 13 in the finals. One long race. No double elmination for Shane. He's in the hotseat.

 

[JAM]

From what I saw from the live scoring, Shane was down 4-1 and finished the set 10-1....soooooooo strong

Final score was 11 to 5.

 

[realkingcobra]

So will Shane have to lose two matches this evening since it is a double elimination tourny?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk - now Free

No, finals one race to 13, win by 2 games.

 

[JAM]

Let's take a roll call here. Who's watching Niels and Van-Van right now?

Van-Van running out. I love this kid.

 

[NYC cue dude]

Turned the cameras around

At the conclusion of Shane's match, the turned the camera to van van and Niels table. Not a great angle, but the match is now streaming.

6-5 lee

 

[lukemindish]

right, but what i meant was after being down 4-1 shane won 10 or the last 11 racks to win the set

 

[JAM]

7-5, Van-Van in the lead.

 

[JAM]

right, but what i meant was after being down 4-1 shane won 10 or the last 11 racks to win the set

Oh, I understand now. :smile: You're right!

 

[PoolBum]

From what I saw from the live scoring, Shane was down 4-1 and finished the set 10-1....soooooooo strong

Yep, that's what he did. I wish they had his TPA. I'm guessing it would be in the .930's or higher.

 

[JAM]

At the conclusion of Shane's match, the turned the camera to van van and Niels table. Not a great angle, but the match is now streaming.

6-5 lee

Very cool of them. I'm digging it!

 

[JAM]

Who is that in the background giving Shane an interview? I can hear the entire thing. LOL

 

[BeiberLvr]

That was a fun match. Shane did get lucky on like 2 or 3 shots, but he still played way better than Shaw.

 

[PanicKJ]

No, finals one race to 13, win by 2 games.

I would feel hipped if I made it to the end undefeated and then lost to someone who already has a loss!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk - now Free

 

[JAM]

The interviewer keeps asking Shane the same question: "In one word, how would you describe your game?" He asks this over and over again. Poor Shane has to say over and over again: "Awesome. Awesome. Awesome."

 

[PoolBum]

Wow, picture perfect out from Niels right there.

 

[JAM]

I would feel hipped if I made it to the end undefeated and then lost to someone who already has a loss!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk - now Free

I didn't like it the first time I saw it, either. My other half stayed on the winner's side, only to get beat in an extended race in the finals. It was at Q-Masters, in fact. Michael Coltrain won. Didn't seem fair to me, but that is what they do in most pro tournaments these days.

Van-Van 7, Niels 6.

 

[PoolBum]

The interviewer keeps asking Shane the same question: "In one word, how would you describe your game?" He asks this over and over again. Poor Shane has to say over and over again: "Awesome. Awesome. Awesome."

"Awesome" would still be understated.