runscott said:You aren't contributing anything to the forum. That's the bottom line.
I have seen a LOT of blathering idiots on AZ Billiards - more than on any forum I've ever visited - but you really take the cake. You even put Poolsleuth to shame.
Congratulations:
runscott said:Maybe, but I don't think so - Deano is just a guy trying to make an easy buck using a "unique" selling technique that preys on idiots looking for a miracle for their game. The typos and grammar problems are probably just a way to make the truly illiterate feel 'at home' doing business with him. Granted, there are probably a few 'normal' people who are intrigued by his idea and figure $300 isn't money flushed, but that's not his target market.
Ericdraven is genuinely unintelligent and illiterate. I doubt the kid could successfully put cheese on a Whopper.
masonh said:got sheep?
FAST_N_LOOSE said:THE OTHER PROBLEM WITH CUE REVIEW IS THAT, IT'S JUST GONNA BE AN ASS KISSING FEST ABOUT HOW GREAT SO AND SO'S CUES ARE. MOST PEOPLE WON'T HAVE THE STONES TO MAKE A POST AND SAY "I GOT A CUE FROM CUEMAKE XYZ AND IT SUCKED"
Maniac said:So, you're saying that the members of this site don't have the cajones to tell it like it is? I can tell you this, if I bought a p.o.s. cue from somebody on this site, or any other website, I'd certainly give a "heads-up" to all the other members here. I think we owe that to each other.
FWIW, I wouldn't care one way or another if the Administrator changed the name of this section. I just want a place where I can do a search for info on a cue that I may be interested in.
Shoot well, my friend!!!!
Maniac
FAST_N_LOOSE said:NOT ALL MEMBERS HAVE THE NUTZ TO DO IT. THEY DON'T WANT TO OFFEND ANYBODY.
I AGRRE THAT EVERYONE SHOULD BE HONEST ABOUT WHAT THEY HAVE SEEN/EXPERIENCED, BUT THAT WILL ONLY HAPPEN IN A PERFECT WORLD. AND THIS ONE ISN'T PERFECT.
I HAD MADE A NEGATIVE REVIEW POST IN ONE OF THE CUEMAKERS THREADS, AND ALL I GOT BACK WAS HOW MUCH BETTER THE NEW STUFF IS. THE PROBLEM IS, I HAD MINE IN AUGUST. SO HOW MUCH CHANGE COULD THERE REALLY HAVE BEEN?
MARCUS
Jazz said:I find it really perplexing why power to be wouldn't consider section name change that was requested by many respected old-timer board members such as Marcus and Joe V and supported by a poll![]()
FAST_N_LOOSE said:NOT ALL MEMBERS HAVE THE NUTZ TO DO IT. THEY DON'T WANT TO OFFEND ANYBODY.
I AGRRE THAT EVERYONE SHOULD BE HONEST ABOUT WHAT THEY HAVE SEEN/EXPERIENCED, BUT THAT WILL ONLY HAPPEN IN A PERFECT WORLD. AND THIS ONE ISN'T PERFECT.
I HAD MADE A NEGATIVE REVIEW POST IN ONE OF THE CUEMAKERS THREADS, AND ALL I GOT BACK WAS HOW MUCH BETTER THE NEW STUFF IS. THE PROBLEM IS, I HAD MINE IN AUGUST. SO HOW MUCH CHANGE COULD THERE REALLY HAVE BEEN?
MARCUS
FAST_N_LOOSE said:Isn't This Section Designed To Discuss All Things Cues?
I Know This Is A Strange Question, But Can We Change The Section Title To Cue Discussion?
What Does Everybody Else Think?