classiccues said:Yeah.. Sanjay is Jimmy Whites, Fast and loose.. ROTFLMAO![]()
JV
YOUR JUST JEALOUUS.
classiccues said:Yeah.. Sanjay is Jimmy Whites, Fast and loose.. ROTFLMAO![]()
JV
cornerstone said:then i have made a mistake it was represented to me as i sold it, and i confirmed it with barry and he made identical cues. i can only go by what the privious owner has told me. the cue was in new condition ! I did not put unchalked but it did have no blue grain on the shafts and no sign of play. my ratings go from top to bottom unchalked-1 from the maker / new- no signs of play-2/ excellent -can tell it has a few hrs on it-3 /light play - minor bluing butt no dings-4/restored -to excellent - 5/ played- minor ding and bluing/vintage -6/ all others will not hit the site except mike masseys cue played hard. since I have a rating system you 2 dealers try to attack me . call thing as they are, not buyer take your chances. it makes it so easy for the buyer to know what they are getting! it makes it easy for the buyer
classiccues said:Why, this is much more entertaining...![]()
JV
thanks jimmy you did not have to throw your self under the train,for me but i thank you!your a good man! and my spelling is hooorrriibblleee. but my wife knew that and still married me!Jimmyrayk said:Just wondering, because a certain person feels the need to continually degrade Bill Grassley, his business and his religous beliefs (and typing skills) Explain this formula to me.
Take all the cues you sell in month. Then double that. Why is it that Bill sells way more cues than this in a week's time. (easily)![]()
He apparently is making a lot of satisfied customers and in turn they have come back over and over and over and over again. He has turned into the most successful cue dealer in the country for a reason. Can you explain to me why?
He apparently does this a lot better than you do.
I know you will come back with one of your highly intelligent, abrasive, self-righteous posts to degrade me. Because thats what you are good at. (That wouldn't necessarily be my life's goal or my contribution to society)
But I will give that to you, you are very good at it.
Again, how come is numbers are so much better than yours? (light years)
I know I should have never posted this, but I really get tired of you talking to people like they are a piece of s*>t. But again, you are very good at it.
Maybe you ought to look at your perfect life in the mirror.
Sincerely, Jim Kissinger
Note: Bill, keep it up. You are doing fine.![]()
![]()
(but don't give him any more fuel for his quick wit. He is good at it)
The numbers speak for themselves!!!!!!!!!
Jimmyrayk said:Just wondering, because a certain person feels the need to continually degrade Bill Grassley, his business and his religous beliefs (and typing skills) Explain this formula to me.
Take all the cues you sell in month. Then double that. Why is it that Bill sells way more cues than this in a week's time. (easily)![]()
He apparently is making a lot of satisfied customers and in turn they have come back over and over and over and over again. He has turned into the most successful cue dealer in the country for a reason. Can you explain to me why?
He apparently does this a lot better than you do.
I know you will come back with one of your highly intelligent, abrasive, self-righteous posts to degrade me. Because thats what you are good at. (That wouldn't necessarily be my life's goal or my contribution to society)
But I will give that to you, you are very good at it.
Again, how come his numbers are so much better than yours? (light years)
I know I should have never posted this, but I really get tired of you talking to people like they are a piece of s*>t. But again, you are very good at it.
Maybe you ought to look at your perfect life in the mirror.
Sincerely, Jim Kissinger
Note: Bill, keep it up. You are doing fine.![]()
![]()
(but don't give him any more fuel for his quick wit. He is good at it)
The numbers speak for themselves!!!!!!!!!
cueaddicts said:are we talking about this cue? if so, yes scott murphey did have it 3-4 years ago. scott purchased it from the original owner who played a lot. it was on the cueaddicts site briefly (pre-refinish), but scott had it refinished by gilbert, and right after that he sold or traded it at the hopkins show. that was a few years ago.
bill, if you don't believe that it's the same cue, take a close look at your picture on the bottom right of your web page.
http://www.cornerstonecustomcues.com/cues/lrgcues/022a.html
look specifically at the grain lines in the maple where it makes a flattened out, oblong oval shape, then see the grain wave above that, and the two bird's eyes right there. if you look at the attached forearm scan, you should see the same exact grain pattern above the point. hard to fade that not being the same cue !!
but you're right, i did try to do a trade/cash deal with you to get it. would also have bought it from you, too, after the show, but you never called me with the cash price. i always liked that cue....imo it's one of barry's most elegant looking non-ivory cues.
classiccues said:Jim,
I have been selling cues since before BG knew what a cue was. If I decided to take the same path, full cuemaker consignment and the like, I could easily accomplish the same thing, and without much thought. I have no beef with the cues or the amount of cues he sells. In fact good for him. The major difference between him and I is I am not hush talking behind his back. I will take any issue to him, straight up, here, to his face, whenever and whereever. Since you aren't privy to these discussions I don't expect you to understand any of it, and that is ok. I won't hold it against you.
I hope he sells a million cues, the more he sells the better off I am. But if he thinks he will continue to sell them as he does without backlash, he is in the wrong business. Why you feel a need to slam me is beyond me, you want to voice a beef, thats cool, but you need to choose your words more carefully and you need a little better information.
I speak to people like they deserve to be spoken to, and thats that. So if thats your correlation, then so be it, and its pretty perceptive I might add.
JV
Jimmyrayk said:I totally respect your knowledge, etc. and most of the time it's not about what you are saying, it is how you say it.
Nobody deserves to be degraded. That's how you treat people. It ain't just Bill. This all your choice, though. It is a free country.
Jim
8-ball Rat said:I'm amazed at how often this blatantly obvious rivalry rears its head in the forums. A thread will start out on a somewhat focused subject, then a dig or two comes out...then before you know it, there's an all out internet brawl.
I think we're ALL aware that you two don't get along....but why not hash it out with each other....either in person, or on the phone, maybe?? Seems to me that THAT would be more productive than taking pot shots against each other in front of everybody. Nothing good will come from it...and inevitably, people are gonna take sides and make matters 10x worse.
Just my $.02....and I do offer refunds.
Listen, JV....I have NO doubt that there's a TON more to the backstory than most of us will ever know....and there's always 2 sides to a tale......on that, I will never disagree with you.classiccues said:I am in for an octagon at Hopkins 2008....![]()
There is also more than what you're reading, in time... in time..
JV
Lets set it up ill talk to blair thien maybee we can do the pain poker and pool stand off with the guys. and 8 ball rat dont worry,Iam done wit the classic cues dramaclassiccues said:I am in for an octagon at Hopkins 2008....![]()
There is also more than what you're reading, in time... in time..
JV
classiccues said:I am in for an octagon at Hopkins 2008....![]()
There is also more than what you're reading, in time... in time..
JV
8-ball Rat said:I'm amazed at how often this blatantly obvious rivalry rears its head in the forums. A thread will start out on a somewhat focused subject, then a dig or two comes out...then before you know it, there's an all out internet brawl.
I think we're ALL aware that you two don't get along....but why not hash it out with each other....either in person, or on the phone, maybe?? Seems to me that THAT would be more productive than taking pot shots against each other in front of everybody. Nothing good will come from it...and inevitably, people are gonna take sides and make matters 10x worse.
Just my $.02....and I do offer refunds.
Jimmyrayk said:Just wondering, because a certain person feels the need to continually degrade Bill Grassley, his business and his religous beliefs (and typing skills) Explain this formula to me.
Take all the cues you sell in month. Then double that. Why is it that Bill sells way more cues than this in a week's time. (easily)![]()
He apparently is making a lot of satisfied customers and in turn they have come back over and over and over and over again. He has turned into the most successful cue dealer in the country for a reason. Can you explain to me why?
He apparently does this a lot better than you do.
I know you will come back with one of your highly intelligent, abrasive, self-righteous posts to degrade me. Because thats what you are good at. (That wouldn't necessarily be my life's goal or my contribution to society)
But I will give that to you, you are very good at it.
Again, how come his numbers are so much better than yours? (light years)
I know I should have never posted this, but I really get tired of you talking to people like they are a piece of s*>t. But again, you are very good at it.
Maybe you ought to look at your perfect life in the mirror.
Sincerely, Jim Kissinger
Note: Bill, keep it up. You are doing fine.![]()
![]()
(but don't give him any more fuel for his quick wit. He is good at it)
The numbers speak for themselves!!!!!!!!!
cornerstone said:Lets set it up ill talk to blair thien maybee we can do the pain poker and pool stand off with the guys. and 8 ball rat dont worry,Iam done wit the classic cues drama
dave sutton said:wait... someone else doesnt get along with joe?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
FAST_N_LOOSE said:I DON'T WANT TO GET INVOLVED.............. BUT AREN'T "NEW" AND "UNCHALKED" THE SAME THING? IF IT'S BEEN CHALKED IT'S NOT NEW, AND IF IT IS NEW, THAT MEANS IT WAS NEVER CHALKED.....THOSE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN MY UNDERSTANDINGS.
IT'S JUST MY 2 CENTS, BUT I THOUGHT I WOULD THROW OUT A COLLECTORS INPUT INTO THIS.