Siming Chen vs Donny Mills

You sound defensive. Like I said, it was a general statement, not directed at you personally.

Thing is, your last reply contradicts what you said:

jrctherake said:
No chit... lol.

The NIT is ALWAYS the one that is NEVER willing to gamble.

I'm not sure NITs know what "to gamble" means.

To me, gambling is:

A toss up.
We have know idea what's gonna happen.


NOT:

I'm gonna be VERY comfortable with the game or I'm not playing.

The second version is what most consider:

Being a good match maker when in fact, its..... most of the time, a LOCK!!!!
Click to expand...

jrctherake said:
Pros are not gambling, period!

Now, if you and some stranger plays a set well, ONE of you would most definitely be gambling. Which one?.....

BTW, your post has absolutely nothing to do with what I said. Nodda....

Another BTW, this is a POOL forum and people that play pool AND gamble are "GAMBLER'S IN POOL".

Just because money is bet does not mean it is a gamble for both parties.

Sometimes, sometimes..... it's more of a calculated risk, not gambling.
Click to expand...

Soo... I guess you are saying pro's are nits for not taking a coin toss bet?

In my experience, any gambler that routinely likes to send it in on something where you have no idea what the outcome should be, is a sucker. Pro's have a favorable edge and try to exploit that advantage. If that is a nit, than I'm ok with it. In my book, the only thing worse than being a nit is...being a sucker.


Eric >"nada"
 
cleary said:
I’ll bet a thousand with the correct odds.

Fargo doesn’t lie. If he has a 12% chance to win, the odds should reflect that. Of course the sleezy poolroom bums wanna steal... 7:1 and I’ll ship it. Your girl is gonna win so take the money.
Click to expand...


I'm not sure who you're referring to, you're certainly not describing me. Maybe it's you who is the sleazy poolroom bum?
Jason
 
jasonlaus said:
I'm not sure who you're referring to, you're certainly not describing me. Maybe it's you who is the sleazy poolroom bum?
Jason
Click to expand...
Im curious Jason I have looked who is at her Fargo rate and those just up or down , do you think she can hang with the majority there long set 10 ball , I don't and there is a couple who I don't think she has a prayer in hell of beating ,


1
 
Last edited:
jasonlaus said:
I'm not sure who you're referring to, you're certainly not describing me. Maybe it's you who is the sleazy poolroom bum?
Jason
Click to expand...

Well, you’re the one trying to steal without giving the proper odds. Sleazy.
 
cleary said:
Well, you’re the one trying to steal without giving the proper odds. Sleazy.
Click to expand...

It's a 35 point difference.You're the sleazbag saying 60 point difference, not to mention how you bash Fargorate nonstop saying its inaccurate. But now all of a sudden when you think you can gain an edge, FR is correct?

You run your mouth nonstop about how Fargo isn't correct, but now they are? Who's the sleazebag?

As I posted in the other thread - who thinks Shane is a 7 to 1 Favorite over Sky? They have the exact same difference in FR as Siming and Donny.

I simply offer to take one side, if you dont like it, move on.
Jason
 
one stroke said:
Im curious Jason I have looked who is at her Fargo rate and those just up or down , do you think she can hang with the majority there long set 10 ball , I don't and there is a couple who I don't think she has a prayer in hell of beating ,


1
Click to expand...

I see no reason she can't win.
Jason
 
one stroke said:
lol you think she has chance against Ruslan race to 100 ten ball ,

1
Click to expand...

If you think she has "no chance", then shut up and put your money where your mouth is.

If you think she has "no chance", then get together a stake and offer to back Ruslan against her giving up 20 games going to 100, and let us know how that works out for you. I am sure her backers will be interested, since you believe she has "no chance".

If you literally think he is that heavy a favorite over her just because she has a vagina, and he has a penis, then this ought to be easy money for you.

In case you haven't noticed, the ten ball break is not a "power" break, so there's no particular reason for strength to play a part in this.
 
Last edited:
I'm actually wondering if many guys just didn't watch the last match versus Donny. To me, Chen had noticeably more skills in certain areas. She broke about the same as Donny, but her cue ball position and her safeties looked much better. Overall, her game looked more solid to me.

I recommend everyone that has doubts, actually watch this upcoming match. Judge her skill level with your own eyes.
 
Get_A_Grip said:
I'm actually wondering if many guys just didn't watch the last match versus Donny. To me, Chen had noticeably more skills in certain areas. She broke about the same as Donny, but her cue ball position and her safeties looked much better. Overall, her game looked more solid to me.

I recommend everyone that has doubts, actually watch this upcoming match. Judge her skill level with your own eyes.
Click to expand...

I watched. I’ll take 7:1 and bet on the tall fella.
 
Fargo tells me Donny is one dimensional. Fargo says 12% chance of winning. Should I not believe them???
 
cleary said:
Fargo tells me Donny is one dimensional. Fargo says 12% chance of winning. Should I not believe them???
Click to expand...

Considering he's gotten into the U.S. Open final four at least once, and DCC 9 ball top 8 maybe twice, no. And also, considering as others have said, that you continually badmouth Fargorate, again, no. You don't get to use Fargorate only when you wanna steal.

But then, both you and any potential bettors are aware of Donny's high performance all while holding down a full time job, so I just had to assume you are just trolling, because you will get ZERO bets down insisting on 7:1.

If you REALLY wanna steal, you should come to DCC next year and steal from me. I can't beat anybody..
 
Someone that knows Fargo Ratings better can chime in, but my estimation is that for a race to 21, Siming is projected to win by something like only 2 games? 21 to 19? Is that right?
 
Last edited:
ShortBusRuss said:
Considering he's gotten into the U.S. Open final four at least once, and DCC 9 ball top 8 maybe twice, no. And also, considering as others have said, that you continually badmouth Fargorate, again, no. You don't get to use Fargorate only when you wanna steal.

But then, both you and any potential bettors are aware of Donny's high performance all while holding down a full time job, so I just had to assume you are just trolling, because you will get ZERO bets down insisting on 7:1.

If you REALLY wanna steal, you should come to DCC next year and steal from me. I can't beat anybody..
Click to expand...

Fact 1: I already have two bets at 7:1

Fact 2: my badmouthing of Fargo can only be proved wrong if I lose.

Fact 3: you have no chance of beating Shaw but a 99.9999% chance of beating me
 
Get_A_Grip said:
Someone that knows Fargo Ratings better can chime in, but my estimation is that for a race to 21, Siming is projected to win by something like only 2 games? 21 to 19? Is that right?
Click to expand...

According to Fargo, Donny has a 22% chance of winning a race 21. But they’re playing best of 3 sets. Which gives him a 12% to win.
 
cleary said:
Fact 1: I already have two bets at 7:1

Fact 2: my badmouthing of Fargo can only be proved wrong if I lose.

Fact 3: you have no chance of beating Shaw but a 99.9999% chance of beating me
Click to expand...

2 bets totaling around 1 dollar isn't much to brag about....maybe it is for you.
Funny thing is, you're still gonna lose. Lololol
Jason
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top