So who was poolkillers/poolkillers81?

So who was poolkillers/poolkillers81?

  • A very young person that knows how to write well and use a computer

    Votes: 6 10.2%
  • A “pod” person, alien, supernatural being or the like

    Votes: 5 8.5%
  • The Iraqi minister of information or someone like that

    Votes: 4 6.8%
  • was part of an experiment doing something for a week then write an instructional manual for it.

    Votes: 4 6.8%
  • An elaborate prankster

    Votes: 7 11.9%
  • A psychopath of some kind; some serious mental disorder

    Votes: 12 20.3%
  • Someone trying to “stir up the pot” and make people angry for fun

    Votes: 18 30.5%
  • Someone who is (for lack of a better term) “just plain stupid”

    Votes: 15 25.4%
  • Just an inexperienced player that went to bars, thinks they understand pool and tried to help.

    Votes: 18 30.5%
  • Someone that doesn’t understand the difference between “better” and “different”

    Votes: 12 20.3%
  • A serious substance abuser that never “comes down”

    Votes: 6 10.2%
  • Other

    Votes: 10 16.9%

  • Total voters
    59
You want standardized rules you have BCA and the World standardized rules. I too have played pool in numerous bars in the US and Canada, the first thing you ask are what is the house rules?

It does not take a rocket scientist to figure that out, Call shot, call pocket, is the 8 neutral, Ball in hand? So what?

His rules were so confusing and fraught with peril when playing the imbibed types that physical conflicts were possible.

Now if you are not interested in reading his ENTIRE manual I have nothing more to say to you.

Isn't the very idea of a standardised set of rules to prevent bar fights? I've played pool throughout the world, to literally hundreds of variants of rules, and to me, it's the single biggest issue in pool. Crack that and there's a chance. I HATE the fact there's so many different rules. It sucks big time. What's charming and quirky initially, quickly becomes tiresome and irritating. It puts people off and causes resentment.

The main problem is, we all want OUR rules. Don't get caught up in what THIS guy has produced - think of the principle behind it and be prepared to give a little.
 
You want standardized rules you have BCA and the World standardized rules. I too have played pool in numerous bars in the US and Canada, the first thing you ask are what is the house rules?

It does not take a rocket scientist to figure that out, Call shot, call pocket, is the 8 neutral, Ball in hand? So what?

His rules were so confusing and fraught with peril when playing the imbibed types that physical conflicts were possible.

Now if you are not interested in reading his ENTIRE manual I have nothing more to say to you.



I wonder how often Thiager does the "Ram" shot or "Shooting from the hip"?
 
As an extreme beginner, his rules, his terminolgy, and his.. ummm different shots were alot more confusing and migrane inducing than any other rules I have read or followed, to include different house rules. I didn't find the difference in rules confusing until I read what he (they?) put together.
 
You want standardized rules you have BCA and the World standardized rules. I too have played pool in numerous bars in the US and Canada, the first thing you ask are what is the house rules?

It does not take a rocket scientist to figure that out, Call shot, call pocket, is the 8 neutral, Ball in hand? So what?

His rules were so confusing and fraught with peril when playing the imbibed types that physical conflicts were possible.

Now if you are not interested in reading his ENTIRE manual I have nothing more to say to you.

So, you've played in North America only? As I said, I've played all over the world - it's a rather big place, buddy, and the last time I checked, the rest of the world were giving your lot a damn good thrashing at pool. Maybe you could learn a thing or two from us, eh?

You're the problem here - you won't yield. You like what you have and you don't want to change. Newsflash, buddy - NOBODY likes change. Don't think what this guy has produced - think of the principle behind it.
 
... The main problem is, we all want OUR rules. ...
Well, no. Some of us want the rules to be as much like the way they have been as possible with changes only for fairness, clarity and to take care of changing tactics which require new rules. Some of us welcome the standardization of the rules even if they're not quite what we would like to see.
 
You are clueless, READ the manual, and get back to me after you have educated yourself, or go back to NPR where you belong.

So, you've played in North America only? As I said, I've played all over the world - it's a rather big place, buddy, and the last time I checked, the rest of the world were giving your lot a damn good thrashing at pool. Maybe you could learn a thing or two from us, eh?

You're the problem here - you won't yield. You like what you have and you don't want to change. Newsflash, buddy - NOBODY likes change. Don't think what this guy has produced - think of the principle behind it.
 
What is the principle behind it?

To provide a template for pool. A mission statement. A strategy. A one stop shop. Yadda yadda.

Don't you think the idea has merit, if it was well written, clear and unambiguous? If it was agreed, ratified and published by the world's pool authorities, and promoted as such? If it was used as a reference document to explore new markets and cement existing ones?

A business plan for pool is long overdue.
 
Thaiger = PoolKiller

Inquiring minds want to know.

Not quite, but I do think that I have found his picture online!

argumentclinic.jpg

If I must give away my secret source.. it's here..
 
I guess I see thaiger's point. If the guy isn't intentionally trolling, then all he's doing is to try to make a standardized set of rules and terms, with the rules based on common bar rules and the terms based on. . . . .. . .

pfft, who am I kidding, he was trolling.
 
So we have an almost even split between 1. A moron 2. A troll 3. A newbie trying to be of some help to newer newbies; very interesting.

My choices were a crazy person that doesn’t know the difference between “better” and “different”. The funny part is that we have some votes in the odd ball columns. Thanks everyone for voting; in retrospect I should have done 3 and not 2 I should have added the A newbie trying to be of some help to newer newbies category to my other 2.
 
So from this one topic alone I find Thaiger to be very annoying. He refuses to read the guide and is formulating opinions on a topic he obviously has no idea about.

Therefore I will consider all of his future posts to be stupid and gloss over them since I have better things to do with my time than read his meaningless retardedness.
 
So from this one topic alone I find Thaiger to be very annoying. He refuses to read the guide and is formulating opinions on a topic he obviously has no idea about.

Therefore I will consider all of his future posts to be stupid and gloss over them since I have better things to do with my time than read his meaningless retardedness.

Dear boy, as I've pointed out ad nauseum, I am not interested in the content this chap has written, I am interested in the idea.

[Note to self: don't talk Strategy with turkeys].
 
I guess I see thaiger's point. If the guy isn't intentionally trolling, then all he's doing is to try to make a standardized set of rules and terms, with the rules based on common bar rules and the terms based on. . . . .. . .

pfft, who am I kidding, he was trolling.

A lot of effort for a troll!

And, if he was intent on trolling for trolling's sake, wouldn't he think of a more anonymous username second time 'round? I would hazard a guess he's young, idealistic and expecting to take the game of pool by storm.

Weren't we all once? :frown:

I say we give him another chance, and stop being such snobs.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top