For $251,000.00 (the difference between first and second), who's gonna win?
edit: Sorry I slaughtered the word who's.
edit: Sorry I slaughtered the word who's.
Last edited:
SlimShafty said:But it will be a long hard battle, nothing like the KOTH, this will be a battle of the run out, I predict a lot of run outs, I can see Hohmann going 4 in a row, then Manalo going 4 in a row...back and forth, who ever gets the nice rolls at the right time will win it all.
TX Poolnut said:The interesting thing is that they have played each other twice in this tournament and Hohmann has owned Manalo both times. Nevertheless, I still have to go with Manalo. He is SSOOOO capable of stringing racks and there's nothing Hohmann will be able to do but watch. I think it will be closer than the previous matches. I predict Manalo in a very close match.
CantEverWin said:The 37% (Throstens B&R for games won) stat is kind of stupid to me. I don't really get it's purpose. I can kind of see where it would be a bad stat to have high. Being that it seems you can only win when you B&R. (If your at 100%)
Anyway, a friend of mine mis read the stats so I thought that others may have too. In the player stats there are two B&R stats. The first listed (The highest) Is B&R % of games won. The second is for games played. Again I don't know why I would need, or even want to know the first one but hey, to much info is never bad.
Anyway Thorsten has around 21%, Maron around 16% for games played.
I pick Marlon by the way, because he's philipino, and that seems to usually be worth at least 1 ball. lol
Mike
That's correct. A guy that runs out every time he breaks is, by definition, unbeatable. To say that a high B&R% out of games won is bad is an oxymoron. The higher the stat, the less the opponent gets to the table at all. And the very best thing you can do, especially at this level, is to keep your opponent sitting pretty.SlimShafty said:The first column (the High %) is the correct one, when you win you break again, so games won is just about equal to the amount of times you get to break. In fact I got reports on the number of breaks from a player in 10 matches and the games won is almost identical to the number of times a players breaks.
On the other hand the second column (the lower%) is wrong completely useless, it includes all games played which includes the times your opponent breaks.
How can you have a stat that includes games you don't even have chance to break and run? The first column 37% is the right number for Hohmann he breaks and runs out about 4 out of 10 breaks.
If your not breaking it can't count against your Break and run average, the term is "break" and run you have to be breaking to even have a shot at breaking and running out.
It would be like counting every at bat of every player on a baseball team to figure out one players batting average, it's just not the correct way to do it.
So Hohmann is breaking and running out at 37% And Manalo at 31%
Guys with higher Break and Run % will clearly be in the top of the IPT standings, also it would be an awesome stat to have high, heck if you break and run at 100% (impossible) you would never lose![]()