Williebetmore said:
DiminishedStrokeMan,
Actually I heard that he was the worst of the 4 speed pool players technically. He did however exhibit a monster break, pocketing multiple balls on the break while squatting the rock - a HUGE advantage in this game (the other competitors were using a more traditional medium speed pool break, and just squatting the rock without making balls; so that they could start as quickly as possible).
Turns out to just be one more form of pool that can turn into a breaking contest (Yukkkk, I'd rather watch straight pool).
Most observers agreed that if contestants were required to start with 15 balls on the table, Luc would be a heavy underdog (I of course have no idea or expertise in the matter; let me know what you think after watching).
I caught the finals on TV yesterday, and what you say about the break being a huge advantage is incorrect.
Sure, Salvas might make an extra 2-3 balls on the break over Pearson, but because the balls are spread so much more compared to Pearson's break, Salvas was forced to move the CB greater distances, which dilutes the advantage of balls made on the break. If Salvas makes less than 2 balls on the break, then his big break is probably a disadvantage.
I noticed the way Pearson was breaking. He was using some sort of cut break where he would hit the one ball off center such that the CB would rebound off the side rail and back into the stack. I guess the strategy behind this is to stop the CB as soon as possible, and have the most options for stop shots with the CB being in the middle amongst all the balls.
But you can definitely tell that Pearson was technically the superior speed pool player. Speed pool seems to be all about making as many stop shots as possible, and choosing the correct patterns such that you maximize the amount of stop shots while minimizing the distance traveled by the CB.
The reason why Salvas won against Pearson was not his break, but because Salvas was the superior shotmaker. I think he only missed about a half dozens shots the entire match, which is completely ridiculous considering the speed at which they play. On the other hand, Pearson was missing balls left and right, adding huge amounts of time. If Pearson had the same shotmaking skills as Salvas, I believe Pearson would dominate him.
I thought watching speed pool would be the biggest joke, but after watching a match I was surprised to grow an appreciation for it. It adds a whole new dimension of strategy to pool along with the speed aspect, but still requires the precise pocketing abilities. It was pretty entertaining to watch, and I wouldn't mind watching it again on TV.