No one is “withholding” information.
They simply haven’t measured the pocket facing angles.
If the Academy deems it consequential, they will take the measurements.
No one is deflecting anything.
Everyone who is making their high-run attempt is making it on a standard Brunswick table cut pocket.
The Academy supports full transparency.
Your demand for this criteria is moot.
"The Academy supports full transparency." How laughable.
On their stream comments, a number of times I saw comments mentioning John Schmidt that were immediately deleted. These weren't negative comments. Just comments noting comparisons between John's attempts and the current player's attempts, average runs, etc. I saw a number of such comments disappear almost immediately when posted. When I posted asking about the missing comments, my comments were also immediately deleted.
You yourself PM'd me and admitted that any comments referencing John Schmidt were being immediately deleted.
To me, that says a lot about Bobby and whether John Schmidt was on these guys' minds when they were organizing this event.
IMHO, this is clearly a vendetta against John Schmidt and any suspicions about their actions or motives should be viewed in that light (e.g. refusing to disclose the table specs, discontinuing the runs as soon as Jayson ran 714, disposing of the table, etc.). They have no credibility as far as I'm concerned.
They have not been transparent about the favorable table set up for this event. Sportsmanship demands that the table specs be published and verified so anyone who wants to make an attempt to beat 714 can do so under the same conditions of Jayson's run. These folks claim to be trying to further 14.1 and pool. Will they show sportsmanship so that others can make a run at 714 under the same conditions?