I'm not stirring any pot. You and Dave keep saying that CTE wouldn't work if he swooped (actually Dave is on both sides of the fence on that point - it seems to be OK for him to swoop). I'm suggesting that you hide in the laundry basket long enough to escape the compound so that you can take a fresh look at things. Is it not possible that swooping and/or some amount of stroke correction is making these shots go in, and not the CTE alignment alone? Is is possible that these corrections are necessary only on some shots and not others?
Again, it sure seems like you guys (except maybe tony) are so defensive that you are incapable of looking at CTE dispassionately and just maybe improving your knowledge of what is actually happening. Even magic, as tony puts it, has a rather mundane explanation when you draw back the curtain.
I'm not saying CTE is all garbage BS. I'm saying there are curious stroke problems here and there, and what does that tell us, if anything, about how CTE works. Maybe the answer is that you can swoop all over the place like Dave, but if your initial alignment and sweep is "CTE correct" than that's all that matters. That's one possible follow up question that could be asked.
The problem is, nobody cares to ponder the significance of new findings like this.
It's kind of how the scientific method helps us learn new things.
My understanding is that there are adjustments/issues, but they can be fixed - like any other aiming method.
Asking my friend if he will answer questions.
Give me some questions, I'm sure he will answer a few.
Thanks
Jason
Edit: he said he would try. So ask away.
PS. I'll be traveling to Michigan tomorrow and probably Florida the next day