I have to admit this post is directed toward those of you who can run about 100 balls, but I hope anybody will feel free to respond.
What is the short list of advice you wish you knew years before you actually learned it? In other words, what really made a jump in your game that got you from the 2-3-4 routine rack runs to the 5-6-7 routine runs? I guess you can guess where my game is.
I can think of a few things along the way that really boosted my game:
1. Realizing that you MUST know exactly where the cue ball is going on natural follow shots.
2. Realizing that you have to be able to hit the cue ball precisely…that english less than 1/8 of a tip can spell disaster for position play if you didn’t want it.
3. Breaking down speed control into several standard increments gave a good guideline for judging how hard to hit a shot.
4. Pick out which 4 or 5 balls you are going to leave on the table last, and do this when there are still twice that many balls on the table. (assuming there are no significant problems left to clear up).
I do realize that sometimes it is just "do everything better." But I have found that there is usually something that still made a big difference somewhere along the line. What comes to mind that really did it for you?
Thanks for any input,
dwhite
What is the short list of advice you wish you knew years before you actually learned it? In other words, what really made a jump in your game that got you from the 2-3-4 routine rack runs to the 5-6-7 routine runs? I guess you can guess where my game is.

I can think of a few things along the way that really boosted my game:
1. Realizing that you MUST know exactly where the cue ball is going on natural follow shots.
2. Realizing that you have to be able to hit the cue ball precisely…that english less than 1/8 of a tip can spell disaster for position play if you didn’t want it.
3. Breaking down speed control into several standard increments gave a good guideline for judging how hard to hit a shot.
4. Pick out which 4 or 5 balls you are going to leave on the table last, and do this when there are still twice that many balls on the table. (assuming there are no significant problems left to clear up).
I do realize that sometimes it is just "do everything better." But I have found that there is usually something that still made a big difference somewhere along the line. What comes to mind that really did it for you?
Thanks for any input,
dwhite