linkui said:Anyone ever heard of the TAP league?
Dale Kocher (Hog Wild TAP) I am deployed to the middle East with the B-1 Bomberlinkui said:who was your operator and where are you deployed to?
thanks I will I can't saylinkui said:stay in touch and ill see what i can get done for you. Which country are you in over there? Keep your head down.
Skess said:Poolhalljunkie,
I've played TAP for quite awhile and really enjoy it. I was also in New Orleans for Nationals and had to wait to get paid. Fortunately for our area, our League Op paid us and got reimbursed from Corporate TAP. I'm not sure who you've talked to so far, but ask for Dave Jefferies at Corporate. He's the guy when it comes to handling that stuff. He should be able to get you an answer one way or another.
There is no excuse for you not having your money by now. If you can, post the results here. I'm curious to see how it ends up.
That would hurt...linkui said:Keep your head down. maybe we'll run into each other.
FLICKit said:I've played in TAP for awhile, and it was an OK league. One of the biggest problems with it, was that their scoring and handicapping system for 8 ball really sucked. The scoring was a pain in the butt, because the scorekeeper had to mark something after every shot. If the shooter makes a ball, then the scorekeeper had to mark. If the shooter makes another ball, then that's another mark. If the shooter misses, then one more mark. Then repeat for next shooter. As a result scorekeeping was a pain, that nobody wanted to do, because pool leagues are supposed to be about having fun and interacting with the players on your team and in the league. But the scorekeeper had to shut everyone else out, and focus only on scoring.
Then on top of that, all of that tedious work would be wasted because the handicap ratings that the computer doled out were noticably inaccurate. The TAP reps would try to cover it up with their normal double talk about sandbagging or bad scorekeeping, but this went beyond those issues. The system was so inaccurate, that it became easy to determine who would win before the match even began... That 4 is so underrated, that he'll win no matter who he plays. That 3 is so underrated, that he'll also win. That 3 is so overrated, that no matter who he plays, he'll lose. That 6 is in such a bad slump, that I'll guarantee that he'll lose. And, over 90% of the time, those predictions would be right. The TAP system would take so long to adjust anyone, that these same players would be mis-rated throughout the whole season.
BCA and other leagues understand that the higher rated player will virtually always win in a straight up match. Therefore, a handicapping system should help the lower rated player only to a point. In other words, if the higher rated player would win 90% of the time, then a good handicapping system would make it so that the higher rated player would win about 55-60% of the time. This makes it a challenging competition for both players. Winning 90% of the time, although fun to some degree, eventually gets boring, and you want to play against stronger competition. Playing more challenging matches is what causes players to improve.
I and many other players all recognized that flaw with the TAP system. Most have moved on to better systems. A small few have recognized the flaw and stayed anyway, usually because their friends have remained.
Besides, not paying players, on any level, but especially on the National Level, is never cool!
linkui said:These are valid points, but i've yet to see the system that is perfect. As always, i love to get feedback and new ideas. Do you have any suggestions on how to make the handicaps work a little smoother?
FLICKit said:Nobody said anything about perfect. Nice try with the typical double speak... Little fake ignorance, so as to ignore what you already know - TAP computer handicapping system is ridiculously inaccurate, and scoring unnecessarily tedious, especially in comparison with the others.
If you want to hear ideas for improving TAP, I'd suggest that you start off by listening to what's been said already.
Here's another bright idea - try paying the players the money that they legitimately expect, instead of doling out vouchers which took over 1/4 of a year to fulfill on, and as has been stated already, some still haven't been fulfilled. If you can't acknowledge the failures and bad ideas, then how can you expect to honestly correct them???
Can you even give an explanation as to why TAP was unable to pay the players and had to resort to lousy vouchers?
Maybe all the TAP players should put vouchers into their weekly dues, and offer the same guarantee of payment at a later date.
Go ahead and try more typical positive spin in order to ignore the clear facts. Let's see if that would be perfect.
linkui said:Wow, you aren't upset easily, are you? I agree with the statements you have made, especially because along with working for TAP, i am also a player. I was also at nationals and had to wait for my money as well. The fact of the matter was, this was something they had just tried out because of a hassle from the government, so i hear. Naturally, it didnt go over so well, with the players, or with the vendors at the tournament who were expecting to have all these winners with all this money coming out ready to spend. Lesson learned. Won't happen again. As far as ignoring problems, i think that you just like the world to know how angry you are and therefore look past any problem solving that is in the works, or maybe you just don't know about them. At any rate, I am sorry for the bad experiences you have had, and I won't try and change your mind one way or the other. I just ask that you give a little more slack and by all means, let he who is without sin cast the first stone. Thanks again.
Sam at TAP said:If I may, I would like to address some of the issues that were brought up about TAP on this board.
As far as I know all of the TAP nationals money that were owed was paid out by TAP. I didn’t handle the payouts so I can’t help you with your problem but please call the TAP nationals office at 800-984-7665 and ask for Dave Jeffries. There may have been a mistake or a oversight in your case but I also know that there is always two sides to every story too. This I can say for sure was that our recent Valley Forge event monies were paid out on the spot and that all future TAP events will be paid out by checks and not vouchers.
TAP is averaging over 1,000 new members a month and strives to be a league for the player. Our national web site has a forum (unlike the APA) for our members to post their questions, input and their concerns on anything that has to do with the league. We listen to our members. Why didn’t you post anything about this on our board? I might also add that our site is getting over 9,000 hits a week. So there is interest in TAP.
As for people saying TAP handicaps are inaccurate, I beg to differ. I still run leagues in Western Pa. and compared to a APA handicap, in my opinion, TAP is far superior. My league is growing while the local APA op here just got downsized. That should tell you something right there.
As for players paying by vouchers, I have been a league op. for 8 years and have been stuck personally for money alot of times and even had to resort to going to court to get paid. Licensees stick their reputation, personal lives and their own money on the line for a league system that they believe in.
One last thing, I am not going to get in a pissing match with some of these people that are very hostile towards TAP. 99% of the time they are APA people and I have had my share of bouts with them on other forums and I will not do it here. We are continually banning APA operators from our message board for posting their garbage. Why do you think they even would bother to come on if they weren't worried about TAP? TAP is growing and will continue to grow because it is a better system out there than anything else going. Just ask their players.
Sam Rullo
TAP VP of Sales