Well Geno posts have been off top for over 10 years, they belong in For Sale Section, he selling something. Be it lessons, chalk, or a services, he a seller of products & service. Put it where it belongs.
Nuther undefined is "lower level player" Pro but not champion? (suspected) or anybody not perfect?A bit off topic for the thread but then again the thread title is misleading. Many lower level players can and do improve. What is more, there are almost endless paths to getting good at pool.
Hu
Make a circle with your finger and thumb and look through at an object across the room. Close each eye until the object is still visible through the circle. The open eye is dominant.
My eyes, like most, are unbalanced besides mono dominant. To me, BFD. If you can see the layout clearly, what's the issue with discovering where the stick goes? Further, indulging perceptual distortion will require biasing your entire stance accordingly. It's also redundant in a way to get down and then re-aim to suit your perception.
Whoa... No witchcarft mannnnn.... lol Ok looked it up but i won't say it! I went through a period leaning over the stick and while it does eliminate some parallax/moire effects, I come to the conclusion that leaning over the stick simply puts my stroke in more congruent alignment to the shot.I went to the table a little bit ago and put a mirror on the wall at the foot of the table, got down in my stroking stance and learned that my stick is under my dominant eye (left) and I shoot right handed. John Morra also shoots that way, or at least when he plays right handed.
I may have been doing this for 50 years or I may have started after my strabismus became apparent a little over 10 years ago. It doesn't seem to hurt my ability to break and run or make long yardage thin cuts on a 9 footer.
I believe that I am cross eye dominant- but what I do know for sure is that I need to LOOK at my final OB contact point a certain and very specific way with my eyes to SEE the shot correctly. I am probably practicing the Perfect Aim method without really ever studying it. Years of trial, error, and discovery have led me to a method of SEEING the shot properly, for me, that results in my best performance at the table. I also KNOW that if I do not follow the sighting method that works best for me- my performance falters- so I think there is something very real about this Perfect Aim method.80% of all players I work with are usually surprised where the stick is positioned. Some swear they are right eye dominant but when they get down the cue is to the left of their nose. Obviously they are left eye dominant. Then there is normal left eye dominant and then there is left eye dominant where the cue is right under the eye like John Morra.
If I can't identify a players dominant eye I can't help them manually improve their vision of the shot.
But it isn't as easy as just moving the eyes. The stance, body and cue all have to be tweaked a little here and there to make this all work the best.
I'm not guessing here. Been teaching this for 15 years and traveled for 5 years on the road. Over 2,000 lessons helping players and learning more about how this works.
I'm not just sitting at the pool table trying to think things out.
This is why nobody ever figured this out.
This is why other teachers or players think they know how this works. They are just thinking.
It took 5 years of grinding it out from pool hall to pool hall teaching and learning along the way.
No book or video to learn this from. Nobody actually knew the whole story about how these eyes work.
But once I show someone and they apply it to their own game they are total believers like the ones I've helped on AZ here.
I found a huge problem that players never even knew that they had. The reason they can't improve and if they do improve it is such a grind.
But identifying the problem wasn't the only part to this. I had to figure out how to fix the problem.
Perfect Aim is the answer to the problem. Loud and clear to those that want to improve and improve faster.
I guess you could say it is a shortcut to improving ones game.
CAUTION: FREE CONTENT NEXT 3 LINES80% of all players I work with are usually surprised where the stick is positioned. Some swear they are right eye dominant but when they get down the cue is to the left of their nose. Obviously they are left eye dominant. Then there is normal left eye dominant and then there is left eye dominant where the cue is right under the eye like John Morra.
If I can't identify a players dominant eye I can't help them manually improve their vision of the shot.
But it isn't as easy as just moving the eyes. The stance, body and cue all have to be tweaked a little here and there to make this all work the best.
I'm not guessing here. Been teaching this for 15 years and traveled for 5 years on the road. Over 2,000 lessons helping players and learning more about how this works.
I'm not just sitting at the pool table trying to think things out.
This is why nobody ever figured this out.
This is why other teachers or players think they know how this works. They are just thinking.
It took 5 years of grinding it out from pool hall to pool hall teaching and learning along the way.
No book or video to learn this from. Nobody actually knew the whole story about how these eyes work.
But once I show someone and they apply it to their own game they are total believers like the ones I've helped on AZ here.
I found a huge problem that players never even knew that they had. The reason they can't improve and if they do improve it is such a grind.
But identifying the problem wasn't the only part to this. I had to figure out how to fix the problem.
Perfect Aim is the answer to the problem. Loud and clear to those that want to improve and improve faster.
I guess you could say it is a shortcut to improving ones game.
@ Geno M
I use double vision instead. Not only does it allow more congruent spinal alignment (with the stick) than cocking or craning to accommodate stereo distortion, the twin sticks form a very good centering template.
@ DCP
GA/GM essentially says the opposite. FWIW I look at the cue ball last. I find it's not that critical on softly stroked ducks but as force/accuracy requirements increase, so do the requirements of the stick to cue ball connection.
Yes it is a leap of faith thing. So is everything else about shooting pool.
If I use CB last, I miss more often, especially if it is an challenging shot, such as end to end thin cut on a 9 footer. I also tried CB last when breaking 8-ball (shooting straight down the center, straight into the head ball) but it did not work nearly as well as OB last.Hit <edit>
edit
save
done/
I think the sequence of your shot routine doesn't so much matter; only that you have one and that it covers the requirements.
As far as I'm concerned, cue ball last should be developed because there is a confirmation bias happening when you see the cut angle. IOW you tend to subliminally cinch what you're shooting at. Yes many a machino blaze away in this manner. The problem arises when this automatic shot reasoning starts to drift. You can't tell; for one. And by the time the method fails, it's too late.
Then you you do the jock thing and tough it till you recover.
(lol)
I've been playing with contacts for a long time. Without glasses/contacts I say "E" on the eye test because I have that line memorized.
I had a pair of glasses that brought the balls into focus, but they had severe barrel distortion. It's challenging to cut a ball along a curved rail. Maybe if I played with them all the time I could have gotten used to them, but I only tried them when my lenses were bothering me.
Some optometrists offer special shooting glasses. The ones I've seen sit very high on the nose. It seems that glasses also have a "vision center" and you want to be looking through that center when you need accuracy. On a typical pair of glasses you will be looking through the top of the lenses.
I don't have a recommendation for a pool optometrist but this has been discussed before here.
Years ago, I used to say "if I can see it, I can make it".
By that, I meant I could hit the object ball exactly where I planned on hitting it...not pocketing a ball that was impossible.
Being able to "see" the shot and having the "mechanics" to enable it are the keys.
I have the book and aside from GB caroms and some simple aiming techniques, I abandoned it because it didn't address any pool issues. I found Fel's Mastering Pool much more practical and enlightening.
Whoa... No witchcarft mannnnn.... lol Ok looked it up but i won't say it! I went through a period leaning over the stick and while it does eliminate some parallax/moire effects, I come to the conclusion that leaning over the stick simply puts my stroke in more congruent alignment to the shot.
I used to be this way with 7' valley tables. I played on them so much I didn't have to look at the pocket, just knew where to hit them and they would go. 4" from the rail and cb is a foot away? Hit it there and it goes. My trouble started when I ventured to 9' and a 10' snooker table. Eventually I could get the balls going right, but it was hit or miss and took a few hours of play to get "tuned in." I got an oversize 8 (8.5') with unforgiving pockets and I just sucked. I kept missing but I knew if it were a 7' it would have dropped, it had the path but the extra lenght made it go into the rail. I talked with Gene and did a skype lesson and almost immediately I started making the tough shots, the long thin ones, slow rolls, fast shots, etc. They dropped in the pocket. I could have probably got to this point eventually, but it turned something that might have took a year of play into something that took a month. I'm dead serious, I was a better shotmaker in a month of doing perfect aim (on an 8.5') than a decade of playing naturally. Now that my shotmaking is up to par, I can focus on learning other aspects of the game, and they come quicker since I'm aiming right.Agreed. When I was first learning with a lot of solo table time If the shot was make-able I presumed that I could make so I shot it with that attitude and it usually worked. If I missed, I set it up and tried again until I had it down. I also got good at seeing the exact spot where I needed to impact the OB to pocket it. Many years later I can still see that spot and rarely have to walk over to sight into the pocket, even with thin cuts.
As far as the aiming portion of this thread, I still have no clue what system I am using or if it is even a system. I just aim and the balls keep dropping, so I don't see the need to analyze it.
I used to be this way with 7' valley tables. I played on them so much I didn't have to look at the pocket, just knew where to hit them and they would go. 4" from the rail and cb is a foot away? Hit it there and it goes. My trouble started when I ventured to 9' and a 10' snooker table. Eventually I could get the balls going right, but it was hit or miss and took a few hours of play to get "tuned in." I got an oversize 8 (8.5') with unforgiving pockets and I just sucked. I kept missing but I knew if it were a 7' it would have dropped, it had the path but the extra lenght made it go into the rail.
I have a a detached retina in my right eye. It's mostly reset (going on 20-30 years already) but one bizarre artifact is magnification is greater in that eye and spheres are particularly prone to retinal distortion; they appear egg shaped through that eye. I've gone through many changes in order to address the cognitive discomfort but I come to the conclusion that it's just discomfort and has negligible influence on matters Newtonian. So...When you were talking on your other post about seeing the cue in double, it made me wonder if you had it too. Mine is a fairly minor case; if I look in a mirror I can't really see it but the ophthalmologist had his assistant come into the exam room to show her the misalignment that he could see just by looking at my eyes and she saw it too. He also pointed out that it was the reason I tend to tilt my head to the left, something I did not realize I was doing.
I still shoot rifle and pistol right handed with no problems but I close my left eye.