Grady said:Two things spring to mind that were wrong with the tournament:
1. 96 "Invited" pros. There's that awful, very discriminatory word again. Such a fine affair should be a truly open tournament.
2. Second place should always be at least 50% of what 1st place pays.
beetle said:It did look top heavy to me.
EDIT: Corvette and I tied, actually.
Yes they were effective. I think Allison made it past many men that were invited.LAMas said:Should the women pros be invited - were they effective?
Grady said:Two things spring to mind that were wrong with the tournament:
1. 96 "Invited" pros. There's that awful, very discriminatory word again. Such a fine affair should be a truly open tournament.
2. Second place should always be at least 50% of what 1st place pays.
Rob is a very cool guy. I met him out here in Phoenix and saw him agian out in Vegas a couple of times.watchez said:One of the few pros I talked to while in Vegas was Rob Saez. He tried to get BigNasty (Chad) to comment on the 'new' ranking system & how that would effect pool. Chad took the fifth. I had never met Rob before but never shy with my words, I interrupted the conversation to ask him what the rankings really mean. When you have invite tournaments, the Prince of Abdul or whatever his name is plays in the World 8 Ball, Mike Sigel can play in any tournament even if he hasn't played in a decade = what do rankings really mean? I agree with Grady. Who cares that the BCA is now in charge of the rankings. Charlie Williams & Predator will invite who they want, the 14.1 people will invite who they want, the Prince of Abdul will invite who he wants. Golf has rankings that work. Tennis has rankings that work. Lesser sports too. Pool needs to wake up. BTW, Rob agreed with me.
Bigjohn said:3. The live stream Sucked!!!
JAM said:Well, the front-page news about Mark Griffin coming to the rescue for American pro players is a godsend. I hope he knows what he is getting into, but I'm sure he does!![]()
Years ago, I stated that it would be cool if there was one website that would list every single tournament happening. Of course, in order for that website to be accurate, the tournament promoters must provide the information. This type of resource would help scheduling tournaments for promoters, as well as players looking for somewhere to play.
If and when the new USA Pro organization comes to the fore, I think no entity should be allowed to call their tournament "world championship" from here on in unless they adhere to the USA Pro rankings.
If the independent promoter wants to invite a select group of players, that's fine. Just don't call it "world championship," and don't expect the USA Pro organization members to compete it unless it is sanctioned by the USA Pro organization or WPA.
Personally, I would like to see the BCA organization -- not the BCA League -- be taken out of the loop from here on in, with one exception. Years from now, I better see Mark Griffin in the Hall of Fame for his contribution to American pool. God bless him and our American pro players.
JAM
Fragged said:Are all the players going to ditch the UPA? I think they should as it seems a pretty do nothing oganization with no real goal at this point. But in reality, I doubt they will.