I am used to predator 314 2nd gen and the stiff hit of it. My recent player just warped and I am looking to buy a cheaper used LD shaft, Anyone have an idea of how the Tiger X hits compared to the 314 2? Is it stiffer or more flexible in comparison?
I am used to predator 314 2nd gen and the stiff hit of it.
I bought a Tiger Ultra X for a Lucasi cue, and it felt loose when I struck the ball far off center. Sorta whippy, like a saw blade 'pings' sorta. That feel, obviously not that sound, lol.
Bought a 314-2 and like it alot. Doesnt feel like the Tiger Ultra X does, and I'm way more fond of the 314-2.
I don't know what Tiger has done since the Ultra X came out, might have gotten better, but I just didnt like the hit.
I say they are stiff because its the only LD shaft I have shot with in comparison to a regular maple shaft. I can not shoot with a regular maple shaft anymore because of the deflection and having to overcompensate all the side spin english without the LD. I am just trying to figure out if I get a Tiger will it be a big adjustment.
Interesting. Most people on this site that critique the 314's describe the hit as too "mushy" for their liking. I have always thought my 314's felt like about a medium hit (I use Triangle tips),
I shoot with the Ultra X LD and love it. It has a solid feel and a great hit IMO. I have had some Predator users try it out and say it has more deflection than the 314's? It's probably in the middle somewhere I would guess. I'm personally sold on the Tiger product after shooting with their shafts now for a couple of years.
**I wish Tiger would promote the shafts more. The name recognition isn't there like PREDATOR and that really hurts them in the market share.