Tips for measuring shafts for you resellers

classiccues said:
Thanks.. I have the standard digital US postal scale that you get at staples and a nice starett that I had when I was in engineering. But like I said in the first post, you need to develop a little touch when using them. If you over squeeze you will dent the shaft and ultimately get a bad read.

JV
With the digital calipers, I put masking tape on the inside of the jaws to protect the shaft, closed them and reset that to 0 to account for the tape thickness. It will accurately measure out from there and won't harm the shaft.
 
JimS said:
How much would be removed from the edges with the file? Guess it wouldn't change the reading by more than a couple 1,000th's?

If I'm not mistaken a lot of digital calipers let you zero the scale. So zero it after you file and you're accurate again :cool:
 
Hierovision said:
If I'm not mistaken a lot of digital calipers let you zero the scale. So zero it after you file and you're accurate again :cool:


Sure! Hadn't thought of that. No experience with that tool. Thanks... now it sounds like a good idea. ;)
 
Snapshot9 said:
I ordered the $3.95 6" calipers from Amazon (Grizzly), but here is the card you referred to, and it is on sale for $.95. It increments in .5mm sizes, and anyone who sells, buys, or trades cues should carry one of these or calipers.

go to: http://www.poolndarts.com/p-6119-Tip-Gauge/

Love your little buddy there Scott. Mine is a 20 lb Benji mix. Beautiful creatures dogs... so much heart. (sorry to hijack the thread)
 
ShaneS said:
Better to multiply by 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884
19716939937510582097494459230781640628
62089986280348253421170679821480865132
82306647093844609550582231725359408128
48111745028410270193852110555964462294
89549303819644288109756659334461284756
48233786783165271201909145648566923460
34861045432664821339360726024914127372
45870066063155881748815209209628292540
91715364367892590360011330530548820466
52138414695194151160943305727036575959
19530921861173819326117931051185480744
62379962749567351885752724891227938183
01194912983367336244065664308602139494
63952247371907021798609437027705392171
76293176752384674818467669405132000568
12714526356082778577134275778960917363
71787214684409012249534301465495853710
50792279689258923542019956112129021960
86403441815981362977477130996051870721
13499999983729780499510597317328160963
18595024459455346908302642522308253344
68503526193118817101000313783875288658
75332083814206171776691473035982534904
28755468731159562863882353787593751957
78185778053217122680661300192787661119
59092164201989
Just to be safe.:D

Really, though. Good advice, Joe.

-Shane

You either omitted or fat fingered a number. I tried your number and didn't get the correct known answer.:confused:

Is the last number rounded off? If not you should have ended with... That may be where the mistake occurs.:D

I seen that pi has been carried out to enough places where it could fill up a decent size phone book. Glad that our tax dollars are being well spent on research.
 
When was the last time someone tried to sell you a 13.0 shaft and advertised it as 12.75? (that was a rhetorical question).
 
This is excellent information. Anyone who is selling a quality cue should be able to supply accurate, detailed specs, including shaft diameters, weights and butt weight. I use a digital caliper and a tanita digital scale and know my specs are correct whenever I sell a cue.
 
DJKeys said:
This is excellent information. Anyone who is selling a quality cue should be able to supply accurate, detailed specs, including shaft diameters, weights and butt weight. I use a digital caliper and a tanita digital scale and know my specs are correct whenever I sell a cue.

Thanks and if I prevent one deal from ending up like the one I am going through, its all for the good.

JV
 
Great post.

One of the ways I measure a shaft is to use calipers on the ferrule, then go up the shaft at least 10 inches to see if there are any measurements less than the ferrule measurement where it meets the shaft wood. Most of the time the wood area if larger, but once in a while I find a shaft that someone has sanded and it is tapered like an hour glass. I always try and list the smallest dimension measured so no one can cry FOUL. It has saved me a lot of headaches. It's hard to beat honesty.

Thanks.
 
JimS said:
How much would be removed from the edges with the file? Guess it wouldn't change the reading by more than a couple 1,000th's?

Jim, it should not change the reading at all Its just the square edge, not the flat part. As mentioned you can re-zero. If you would rather not file just use tape as mentioned. You still have to be careful so its your choice.

Rod
 
TheBook said:
You either omitted or fat fingered a number. I tried your number and didn't get the correct known answer.:confused:

Is the last number rounded off? If not you should have ended with... That may be where the mistake occurs.:D

I seen that pi has been carried out to enough places where it could fill up a decent size phone book. Glad that our tax dollars are being well spent on research.

Pi is a transcendental number; the exact value can never be computed. I believe the most recent calculation yields about 200 billion digits.:eek:

There are a lot worse subjects to research... Math, aside from logic, is the only 'truth' in life. ;)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top