Titlists with highly figured wood

billiardcue

11th Commandment
Silver Member
Show us your Titlist with highly figured wood or unique wood.

Any Titlist - one piece house cue, 2 piece Hoppe, conversion by any cuemaker, whatever.

Only criteria is pretty wood.

I'll start with this cocobolo conversion - the cue started life as a 1940s house cue. They were $2.75 in the 1942 Brunswick catalog.

Notice the points are pointy on both ends and the veneer colors are nice and subdued. I'm not a fan of the gaudy purple and green veneers of the 60s & 70s.

Pictured is all 360* - 45* at a time.


samtit_Q2184 hdl.jpg


The rest of the cue.

samtit_Q2184 bsfa.jpg
 
Titlist

Really pretty cue you have, just classic, with a twist at the butt!
Thank you for sharing!
 
This thread needs some more action, so here's my Palmer C, which has a nice piece of wood. Maybe not incredibly figured, but I think it's a nice rich wood, probably rosewood. Let's see some more nice Titlists.
 

Attachments

  • DSCN0349.jpg
    DSCN0349.jpg
    103.1 KB · Views: 941
  • DSCN0354.jpg
    DSCN0354.jpg
    97.7 KB · Views: 931
  • DSCN0361.jpg
    DSCN0361.jpg
    80.8 KB · Views: 923
Walnut,

not the most highly figured wood, but very nice when it was finished.

SLIM

1 CONVERSION23.jpg
 
Just a question.

billiardcue,

so you're saying that titlists before 1960 did not have purple & turquios veneers?

SLIM
 
billiardcue,

so you're saying that titlists before 1960 did not have purple & turquios veneers?

SLIM

no, they all have the same colors, just the colors in the veneers of older titlists aren't as bright and vivid as the old titlists used water based dyes which tended to fade and not be as "loud" as the veneer colors in later titlists.
 
no, they all have the same colors, just the colors in the veneers of older titlists aren't as bright and vivid as the old titlists used water based dyes which tended to fade and not be as "loud" as the veneer colors in later titlists.

i have seen some older titlists that the veneers were pretty vivid once the cue was turned down for conversion. Even with just some sanding an older titlist, that i am keeping as a one piece, veneers apear pretty vivid.

maybe our opinions of vivid differs.

SLIM
 
I have a rather unique one piece that I believe to be Brazilian rosewood.
I cant post pics for a couple of days...wait for it:p
 
Ok I think I can post pics now.

I am not an expert on wood identification and this is old wood and is oxidized but the colors are amazing. I can only imagine what it would look like after some 80 grit;).

As you can see the veneer colors are bland at best but who knows what might come to life after a conversion.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0621.jpg
    IMG_0621.jpg
    80.2 KB · Views: 370
  • IMG_0616.jpg
    IMG_0616.jpg
    79.1 KB · Views: 394
  • IMG_0620.jpg
    IMG_0620.jpg
    92.1 KB · Views: 369
  • IMG_0619.jpg
    IMG_0619.jpg
    74.3 KB · Views: 382
Last edited:
Ok I think I can post pics now.

I am not an expert on wood identification and this is old wood and is oxidized but the colors are amazing. I can only imagine what it would look like after some 80 grit;).

As you can see the veneer colors are bland at best but who knows what might come to life after a conversion.

The cue is beautiful, but I have to ask because I can't tell from your pictures. Are you 100% sure it's a titlist? If it is, it's one of the best I've ever seen. There were other companys making full spliced house cues back in the day though. A lot of those I've seen are highly figured. If it is a titlist you have a gem there!
 
The cue is beautiful, but I have to ask because I can't tell from your pictures. Are you 100% sure it's a titlist? If it is, it's one of the best I've ever seen. There were other companys making full spliced house cues back in the day though. A lot of those I've seen are highly figured. If it is a titlist you have a gem there!

Thanks, and yes I am sure although there is no label I have this.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0622.jpg
    IMG_0622.jpg
    89.4 KB · Views: 354
You can also see it in this photo on the far right.
 

Attachments

  • rsz_dscn3994.jpg
    rsz_dscn3994.jpg
    62.7 KB · Views: 351
Back
Top