The APA is good for selling lots of cheap cues and making bars some drink money.
Most bars around here have plenty of open tables when it isn't league night. I also know for a fact that they do very, very good drink business on league night. When a Tuesday brings in almost as much as some Fridays, you know they're having a good night behind the bar.
That is not really a way to grow pool.
Maybe 10% of the APA players know what a good player looks like, or what rules the pro players play by or can name more than 2 pros, or have ever seen or heard of a TAR match or have gone to see a pro tournament. It's like saying that illegal immigrants are a good way to grow the US population.
How many TAP, BCA, Valley or NAPA players will know what a "good player" looks like? Do you have all the percentages worked out for them, as well? When you consider that the APA probably has as many players as the rest combined (or at least a significantly larger membership, in any case) and admittedly markets to beginners, why is this surprising?
Do you feel that in order for someone to learn to play pool, they must know who Efren is? That they must buy PPV's, and that they must know which rules that the pro's use? (Which, of course, change between tournaments, but why worry about that pesky little detail.)
I know there were many posts on here how there were free to attend pro events during huge league yearly tournaments and the stands were pretty much empty. That is not helping pool, it's helping the league owners and also helping McDermott sell overseas made cues to those players. I can't say that is all bad, it's certainly good for the companies involved, but it does not help pool as a sport. For anyone to say that the leagues bring in a 100,000 players into the sport we need to see 100,000 people viewing the free live streams when SVB plays Efren and getting 10,000 people paying TAR $20 to watch 2-3 days of one on one action.
And of course the stands were full during previous years BCA nationals with the pro's in the same building....no wait, they weren't. Or did you forget that? Yes, it's only APA players who don't go see the pro's, right......
I just played a few games with some APA players at a bar. I was totally messing with them yet was able to win every game for about an hour before I left. When I had to go, one of them said "you are actually not that bad do you ever play for money" LOL I was very nice and said "no" and I also made sure that I properly admired his game how close they all came to winning that i just got lucky and what a great cue he had. He had a lower end McDermott that he said his dad paid $500 for. It was a stick you can get for maybe $250 a basic G shaft model. Nice cue but he probably had no idea what it really was as far as the shaft technology or construction goes. That is what the APA and other league players give us.
There are players in my little APA division in the middle of nowhere that have pretty expensive cues. More than a couple, actually. And they do indeed know about them. They are the minority, of course. But I suppose to you, we must all spend over $1000 on cues, in order to "grow the game".
Why do you care what those particular players know about cues, or carry in their case? And once again, did you do the same exercise with BCA, TAP, NAPA and Valley? (Yes, I own a McDermott, and I like it. Its a basic G-Shaft model, too. And yes, I know that it is a basic LD shaft, when compared to others available. Couple hundred bucks, reasonable for what I had available to spend. Would I like to upgrade, sure. Can't afford to right now, perhaps I will someday.)