Was Einstein Right About 6 Million Shots on a Pool Table?

Simplifying "The Game of 4000 Shots" - the Inside Way.

I understand the game of 4000 shots, believe me, when I came back from not playing for several years I tried that game. It was a blessing in disguise because the game was so difficult that I worked fanatically on my fundamentals and as a result they're better than before.

When I came out of retirement, my first tournament was the US OPEN and even though I finished 9th (with wins over Earl Stickland and several top professionals), the game was still not "natural" and I think I was trying to play the "4000 shot game" and it made me not want to play....so I lost interest and did the nightclub business for another couple of years.

This time I got this burning desire to play again, and to figure out once and for all what the heck I used to do that seperated me and gave me the confidence to play Efren, Earl, Johnny, Sigel, Varner, Mizerak, Rempe, etc and actually come out on top (even though they all did certain things better than I did).

I knew when I was playing my best I thought of two things: Touch Of Inside and Accelerate!!! This seemed like it was too easy and I had been doing this, however, I just couldn't get myself to do it every time (some of you already know that feeling).

Then one day it "clicked" and I understood that the Touch Of Inside was indeed a system of play. Not the "4000 ball system," but a system where I could play a consistent shot speed, shot angle, and cue ball target and it would align perfectly to the geometry of the pool table.

Not just because the table was two perfect squares and a rectangle, and many triangles.....the reason TOI works is because of the perfection of the cue ball and object balls. It works because of the spheres and when you cue the ball to the inside it opens up the Game and it starts to tell me the shot, not "one" of the 4000, just one shot, the TOI shot.

The Touch of Inside changed the Game for me - I don't have to think anymore because the table tells me the TOI Shot and I don't have 4000 choices. I used to think more choices were better, now I know that it's more important to have "better choices," not "more choices."



I was like you thinking it is about 700 possibilities, until i learned the advance knowledge and secrets; then you will count 4000 shots possibilities.
 
Judging by this quote Bruce Lee would have been a "TOI Player".

Ping Pong isn't that tough, Bruce Lee could play the game with nunchucks. ;)
th
Judging by this quote Bruce Lee would have been a "TOI Player".




And yet because pool is played is played indoors on a level table for a "playing surface", and played essentially in only 2 dimensions with the balls starting out stationary....it's really the sport with one of the smallest number of "possible" shots and outcomes isn't it? I'd say quite a bit less than even Ping Pong where the ball is in constant motion...which of course is also played indoors on a table, but at least is truly 3 dimensional with a constantly moving ball that arguably never presents exactly the same shot.
 
Captain Obvious works day and night to protect 'The Land of AZ'

Thanks for clarifying.......
captain-obvious.jpg


Well, in case you didn't know, that is not Bruce Lee, but a look-a-like, and the ball was added to the video. It's not real.
 
.it's a great game for your Mind, Body and Spirit

I remember when we were kids we wanted to do what we weren't allowed to do....Maybe we should make pool an "Adults Only Game" and the kids will be climbing walls to get in to play the game.Maybe the older demographic is overlooked.

I know many in their 60's, 70's, and even 80's that would love to have a better reason to play pool...it's a great game for your Mind, Body and Spirit and can be played by everyone including all ethnicities, gender's and ages.. truly a sport/game for everyone to enjoy... the Master Game


Except my mom can't play ping pong anymore, but she can play pool....so
 
I remember when we were kids we wanted to do what we weren't allowed to do....Maybe we should make pool an "Adults Only Game" and the kids will be climbing walls to get in to play the game.Maybe the older demographic is overlooked.

I know many in their 60's, 70's, and even 80's that would love to have a better reason to play pool...it's a great game for your Mind, Body and Spirit and can be played by everyone including all ethnicities, gender's and ages.. truly a sport/game for everyone to enjoy... the Master Game

That much I can agree on. Everyone can play pool ;-)
 
It was posted as a joke to "lost" about his ping pong statement. This video has been going around on social media all year, it's hilarious!!! :rotflmao1:



If it was so obvious to you that you have to try another veiled attempt at name calling, why did you post it? :rolleyes:
 
many of the Retirement Communities have pool tables

Pocket Billiards is the best game for folks in their retirement ages. You can stay active both mentally and physically. Besides, many of the Retirement Communities have pool tables, sometimes several in their gaming areas.


That much I can agree on. Everyone can play pool ;-)
 
It was posted as a joke to "lost" about his ping pong statement. This video has been going around on social media all year, it's hilarious!!! :rotflmao1:

Catch up with the times, it's 6 years old. What was the joke part, the statement before, or after the picture? I'm guessing the after part.;)
 
Pocket Billiards is the best game for folks in their retirement ages. You can stay active both mentally and physically. Besides, many of the Retirement Communities have pool tables, sometimes several in their gaming areas.

I was looking at 55+ mobile home parks when I was moving to Phoenix.
One of them was called "The Good Life".
I was walking around, when the park manager noticed me, and saw I was wearing a pool related t shirt.
He asked if I would like to see the billiard room, and I said sure!
I was expecting 3 or 4 Olhausens or Connellys, but when we walked in, there were either 8 or 9 Diamond Pro 9 foot tables with lights in perfect condition , I nearly fainted.
I ended up not buying there , because the homes were too close together.
But the place was set up better than most pool rooms.
 
Why don't you check your Face Book page and you will know.......


Catch up with the times, it's 6 years old. What was the joke part, the statement before, or after the picture? I'm guessing the after part.;)
 
Einstein said there were over 6 Million possible shots on a pool table, do you believe this is fact, or another example of urban legend?

How many shots do you believe are possible on a pool table and what formula did you use to come up with your estimation?

01.jpg

Maybe it's time for a definition of 'shot'.

The object ball is on the spot....the cue-ball is one foot away, straight in.
Is that one shot?
You can hit it many different ways.....are those different shots?
 
I would assume that Albert disregarded any object balls. You shoot the cueball.

Since Albert got to around 6 million I can only assume he disregarded the direction you shoot the cueball
in aswell since most players can probably hit a spot on a rail within a couple mm's that alone gives thousands
of variations.

I am thinking Albert felt you always shoot straight ahead so the direction is not really a variable. That leaves 3:

- The spot you hit on the cueball, maybe a couple hundred
- The speed with which you hit the cueball, again a couple hundred
- The elevation of the cue, a couple dozen variations

I suppose he wasn't all that wrong. Of course there is an absolute infinite number of outcomes
your shot can have on the table but only so many variations that you can actually produce.

gr. Dave
 
A "shot" doesn't necessarily have to be directed at a pocket,

This is a shot, and it could be turned into different shots by varying the speed and spin. You will see the same theme of shots come up and, as you pointed out, "straight in" shots are one theme, half ball hits are another. One theme of speeds may be moderate, and one theme of spins may be severe. A "shot" doesn't necessarily have to be directed at a pocket, there's more "shots" that don't go in (the pocket) than do.

You could see this more clearly on a 3 cushion billiard table where there's no pockets.


Maybe it's time for a definition of 'shot'.

The object ball is on the spot....the cue-ball is one foot away, straight in.
Is that one shot?
You can hit it many different ways.....are those different shots?
 
Left english on the cue ball puts right spin on the object ball

Now you're getting the idea. :thumbup: Sometimes our minds make things too complicated, we then have to separate the factors involved and compartmentalize.

Pool's easier to understand if you take away the object ball, then you will see it in the simplest way......hitting the cue ball at a particular spot "tip target," with a specific speed/elevation, directed in a straight line....this is what we describe as a "shot".

The object ball will then reflect this process like a mirror. Left english on the cue ball puts right spin on the object ball, low transfers to high on the object ball, hitting the object ball on the right makes it move left, etc.

This is why I like to favor the inside of the cue ball, because when you cue the ball to the right, it makes the object ball cut more to the right - when you target the cue ball on the left it will compliment and actually cut the ball more to the left......this the foundation of why TOI is an effective technique. www.thegameistheteacher.com





I would assume that Albert disregarded any object balls. You shoot the cueball.

Since Albert got to around 6 million I can only assume he disregarded the direction you shoot the cueball
in aswell since most players can probably hit a spot on a rail within a couple mm's that alone gives thousands
of variations.

I am thinking Albert felt you always shoot straight ahead so the direction is not really a variable. That leaves 3:

- The spot you hit on the cueball, maybe a couple hundred
- The speed with which you hit the cueball, again a couple hundred
- The elevation of the cue, a couple dozen variations

I suppose he wasn't all that wrong. Of course there is an absolute infinite number of outcomes
your shot can have on the table but only so many variations that you can actually produce.

gr. Dave
 
Back
Top