DieselPete
Well-known member
A thread spun off into whether or not a particular young woman is a professional. So, separate from a specific player, I am curious what people consider the necessary criteria to be a "pro," broadly speaking.
Never before in sports have the amateur/pro lines been so blurred, with the introduction of NIL deals into college and now high school sports. Cross country runners that couldn't take $300 for winning the local Turkey Trot without running afoul of NCAA rules can now have a million-dollar Nike deal. It goes well beyond just the high-profile, revenue sports.
So, apparently income alone does not make one a "professional." Or in the world of pool, does it?
In your opinion, to call oneself a "professional" pool player, one should do what (and is it "all of the following"? or just one or two things)?
Never before in sports have the amateur/pro lines been so blurred, with the introduction of NIL deals into college and now high school sports. Cross country runners that couldn't take $300 for winning the local Turkey Trot without running afoul of NCAA rules can now have a million-dollar Nike deal. It goes well beyond just the high-profile, revenue sports.
So, apparently income alone does not make one a "professional." Or in the world of pool, does it?
In your opinion, to call oneself a "professional" pool player, one should do what (and is it "all of the following"? or just one or two things)?