I thought you had TWO. One for 24 hours and one for 12 hours. Yes/No?
I'll buy your script for reinstatement. What did you say that was sooooo convincing?
What is your PSR?
- Thread starter Ralph Kramden
- Start date
I thought you had TWO. One for 24 hours and one for 12 hours. Yes/No?
I'll buy your script for reinstatement. What did you say that was sooooo convincing?
Yes, I think I did have one 24 hour ban previously along with Lou. Straightpool99 was right. Half the members in this forum get banned over and over, so who cares anymore? Must be the water.
How about acting like an adult so you don't need to buy my script? Otherwise, youl'll have to wait for it as it is in my publisher's hands, what with all the diagrams and such. :smile:
We'll see what happens in the future which could start again tomorrow. Who's your target going to be?
Hey, how about trying the shots I talked about in the thread started? No? I kinda
figured it would be the case. It's too positive for you. Go ahead tear it down and say IT doesn't work. I KNOW DIFFERENTLY.
I'll act the way I want to act when I choose to and don't need your advice. You can do likewise for yourself. Do you have kids or a wife? Preach to them and tell them what to do. Not me ever again.
Good for you, I hope your book sells. I know a professional/ teacher that can help the guys that spend years and years trying to learn it.
Last edited:
Nawww i dont want to work too hard at it. Is there a low deflection drumstick out there yet?
I'm sure there is. They even make left-handed drumsticks.
No false labeling here on my part. I simply say (both here on AZ and in my book) that if a player can accurately hit the aim point indicated by the system, the ball goes into the pocket. If a player wishes to use english to help thicken or thin up a certain angle instead of trying trying to get exact with the fractions, excellent!
That player is developing his or her own feel/instinct for pocketing balls. That's the goal of my book.
Several times you stated here-no feel and no adjustment. If you are using the whole pocket as slop then you are good to go......
AtLarge and a host of others understand the difference. Some are dead on and some are really close does not work.
I'm done! It's a stupid argument.
Stan Shuffett
----------
:
Last edited:
Yes, it is a stupid, meaningless argument. Facts tell all. And the fact is, there is only feel if a player begins to incorporate it into the system. And in the real world, having a feel for doing something is a beautiful skill to have.
I completely understand where you're coming from and your request will be honored.
I accept that you can't grasp the concept. I will promise you this: If CTE had the same gaps as POOLOLOGY I'd been toast a long time ago.
Stan Shuffett
ah, you were toast a long time ago. You just didn't realize it
Lou Figueroa
just maybe?
Last edited:
ah, you were toast a long time ago. You just didn't realize it
Lou Figueroa
just maybe?
You are smart enough to say JUST MAYBE.
Stan Shuffett
And I accept that you know nothing about Poolology, yet you assume there are tons of gaps. The system covers all cuts up to a 1/8 hit. There are two or three situations where the player must aim thinner or thicker, by an exact fractional amount, not by guessing. The system gives the player a line of aim that will pocket any reasonable shot. As AtLarge correctly pointed out, the subjective aspect of the system is in the player's ability to accurately determine the exact location of each fractional aim point. The same subjectivity applies to a player's ability to pinpoint CTE's A, B, or C perceptions. Of course you don't believe this, but it doesn't change the reality of it being true.
If a player wants to be more consistent at pocketing balls, and uses typical judgement in determining which shots are low-percentage, Poolology could very easily be the answer. That's the extent of my claim.
If a player wants to be a miraculous shot maker from anywhere on the table, defying the odds, shooting sell-out shots as if they were straight-in, guaranteed to never miss and never need any "feel" for such shots, well....maybe they'll find that in your CTE book when it hits the bookstores. I tried it and was unable to make basic shots with any consistency, but maybe that's because I'm not a professional. I understand the perceptions, that part is a common visual. On any given shot a player can stand behind the CB and find the exact focal point where a CTE line and a ETA or ETB line can be seen at the same time. It's what comes after that step that seems to be the major roadblock for guys like me and Dennis. Anyway, I believe you would've had a much smoother road with CTE had you responded to criticism and questions with a more diplomatic approach rather than a denigrating approach.
When you look around and don't know who the sucker is in the game reminds me of you., Everybidy here understands your gaps but you. The sad part about it that a couple of them have played you like fiddle.
Stan Shuffett