I understand. A good way to describe it is: From the right perspective one can easily find the correct perception needed to fix or lock-in the CB.
In the case of CTE, It's possible to rule out perception and perspective altogether, because there is a reality going on that most people with vision in both eyes, sees a blended vision of two images into one in their/our daily lives.
Perhaps the more accurate statement in the case of edge to A, center to edge, is to say, "observe the distinction". But "pick up the perception" is fine too and probably more efficient in a way because there is a objective in mind.
Regardless of what one wants to call it, the perception method is quite clever and mandatory imo because it gives a clearer or clearest visual method of programming the brain as to just what the hell the eyes or "cameras" are looking at.
This is why I took it a step further in what I invented as "panoramic programming". This entails a more deliberate process of physically walking around the the entire shot relationship in a way to give the brain a more complete detail of what the reality is.
The problem is that it takes a bit too long but when it's done right, and you come back full circle to the shotline, it pulls you into the correct alignment position like a tractor beam and the overall visual down at address is so much clearer and after launch point, the movement of the balls are night and day smoother like 1080hd vs 8mm.
I know that Stan's method is not necessarily the same thing but it does give a good perspective of a fixed point to go into and complete the objective and there is a definite visual smoothness after launch point as well. "Edit"....I'm talking about the CTE method Stan came up with, just the simple visual pick up without the lengthy process I described. With Stan's method, I found a very noticeable visual smoothness after launch point. Just wanted to make that clear from my own experience and I'm not talking for Stan or am defining his work. It is my opinion and let others decide for themselves.
The thing I've found most strange about this panoramic programming thing I messed around with, is that even with kick shots, if done correctly or sufficiently, it has a remarkable success rate attached to it.
So, I believe when others recommend going to the other side of the shot, like I see many great players do in their psr, they are knowingly or unknowingly programming the brain with a better perspective of reality or percieved reality that enables a better outcome.
Any way sir, go play that CTE guy THEY MAKE ALL THE FUSS ABOUT!!
Shoot'em now Abe, shoot'em now!!.......shut up 'Lige
