Bob Jewett said:
I was standing near the cue makers booths at one BCA Trade Show and the assembled wisdom of those present, including some very well-known high-end names, was that if you put Duck Tape around the joint of any stick, no one could tell you what was underneath.
John McChesney actually did that experiment, and you can read about it in Google Groups -- I think it was in RSB but it might have been in ASP. The result was that no one could tell by the hit what the joint was.
The majority of how a stick hits the ball is in the shaft, and the tip itself can make a huge difference.
Ivory increases the collectibility and reduces the reliability, on average.
Bob,
No one could tell you what was underenath? That's a pretty broad statement. I'd bet Efren, or Sayginer, or some of the other best "feel" players would know what was underneath. Maybe the scores of league and even A and AA players may not be able to tell, but I don't agree that no one could tell.
My opinion is that a player should use a joint material that he feels most confident with, no matter what material is used. It seems that too many people are trying to make too many aspects of pool non-personal, lumping many things into what they feel is best for the masses that play. I've heard for years now that phenolic tips are best for breaking, and Meuccis deflect less and play better because of experiments. Experiments are good in some areas of pool, but pool is such a feel game, and the hit of a cue is such a subjective matter, that I don't see how anyone can say that one material plays better (or no better) than another. They can only be referring to themselves, as they don't know what other players feel when they hit with any cue. How can any cue maker (or statistician) say what is best for me, or what I will feel or will not feel when I hit with a cue?
I also feel that the higher the skill level (as in any sport), the more that a player can feel differences in all components of a cue, or cue ball, or object ball, or many of the other subtle factors, of which I feel pool has many. But many up-and coming players worry too much about what cue Efren or Archer or Thorsten use instead of having enough confidence in their own opinions to know what really feels best to them.
One more question. I understand your statement about collectability, but not about reliability. Why would you say that ivory reduces reliability any more than different woods or phenolic (or steel) joints would? Are you referring to the makeup of the material being more brittle, or the way that the material plays after it is installed?
Thanks,
Mike