Hmmm, well, I would attribute most of what you just stated to a couple of reasons, 1) being, hard to put a player in the penalty box so to speak to get the point of the rules across clear as day...if they have NO pay to lose as a penalty. 2) if you're not paying the pros worth a shit, don't expect them to stand up and represent a sport that DON'T support paying them. 3) it's hard to represent this sport as professionals if the pros are forced to play against amateurs who have to be let in to play because their dead money entry fees are needed to build a pot of payouts worth while showing up for. 4) until there's repeat pros playing in monthly events, nothing has changed. 5) the ONLY way I'd support any amateurs playing against the pros is if the amateur pay an entry fee, that only get paid out after the first round loss of players. An example would be 16 pros are playing in a monthly event, ALL being paid, even they lose their first match. NOW if 16 amateur players want to play against the pros, that's great, but they'll be required to pay a $100 entry fee, their names to play will be randomly drawn, and each of the amateurs will be matched up with a pro in their first match, which pays nothing if a player loses the first match then, and will be required to play under the same tournament rules as the pros, race to 21, single elimination format, AND they must be actively participating in the BTRT competition format, no different than the pros.