jasonlaus said:What Cuemakers do you KNOW of have apprentices & what is the extent of their[apprentices] work. What do you believe could be improved upon by the maker as far as quality since hit is subjective.
snowmon34 said:Apprenticeship is not always a negative....There are plenty of great cuemakers that started out as students...
snowmon34 said:Apprenticeship is not always a negative....There are plenty of great cuemakers that started out as students...
jasonlaus said:I'll go first. I have seen some Gina's that the Miters? looked terrible. Just wondering why people don't think this is important & I understand Ernie is one of the greats but the miters are important too. If you're selling functional art shouldnt everything be taken into consideration? Why can Haley get them almost perfect but Ernie can't. I've got my flame retardant clothes on so fire away.
manwon said:I have seen some Gina's that the Miters? looked terrible. Just wondering why people don't think this is important & I understand Ernie is one of the greats
So what does that have to do with an apprentice, or are you saying that it looks like an apprentice did the work?
Any cue maker who has an apprentice is certainly responsible for the work they do, because it will reflect directly upon that cue maker. With that said, I think it is the responsibility of that cue maker to fully inspect all work done by an apprentice.
I own a pool room, retail store, and full pro-shop including cue repair. The cue work I do is everything from tips to complete refinish work / restoration of Antique cues. In addition since 2006 I have started building a limited number of conversion cues, jump break cues, and jump cues for my local customers. I have a young man that has worked part time for me for the last two years who I have trained for doing basic cue repairs. I have also allowed him to build his own shooting cue and jump break cue. Now he has been doing basic cue repair for almost two years, however, his work never leaves my shop unless I inspect it, and it is to my standards. I do this not because I think he is going to intentionally let bad work leave the shop, but because whether the work is mine or his I am still responsible for it. In addition, no matter what anyone says my name is on everything leaving my store including merchandise I sell, some may disagree but that is my opinion. People in business should never forget, the customer is always right, even when they are not. But, by treating them that way, even though you may lose a little right there, you will get 10 fold back in the end.
Just my thoughts.
jasonlaus said:What Cuemakers do you KNOW of have apprentices & what is the extent of their[apprentices] work. What do you believe could be improved upon by the maker as far as quality since hit is subjective.
tpdtom said:I ask that question of every middle aged/older great cuemaker that I talk with. None of them have apprentices and I get two responses on a regular basis. One common statement is that after they learn enough they [apprentices] go off on their own and become the competition. Another is that their work is never correct enough and it costs too much to absorb their mistakes.
It's easy to shoot holes in those excuses but apparently those makers choose to work alone. Go figure...Tom
tpdtom said:I ask that question of every middle aged/older great cuemaker that I talk with. None of them have apprentices and I get two responses on a regular basis. One common statement is that after they learn enough they [apprentices] go off on their own and become the competition. Another is that their work is never correct enough and it costs too much to absorb their mistakes.
It's easy to shoot holes in those excuses but apparently those makers choose to work alone. Go figure...Tom