It's all in here:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Encyclopedia-Pool-Hustlers-assortment/dp/1494219468
Good read!
http://www.amazon.com/The-Encyclopedia-Pool-Hustlers-assortment/dp/1494219468
Good read!
That is possible. I thought it was '85 but could be mistaken.
Ok, did some research and it was June of 1986 and Kelly was not the only one to get to 7 against him according to accu-stats.I asked because Sigel won the Sands Reno tournament in June of '85, and while Efren won the December Sands tournament that year he lost his first match, and three guys got to 7 against him after that.
Funny how the memory changes over the years.R E N 0 - An 8-0 record at the Sands Regent Open earned Efren Reyes his first major
title of 1986 and the $10,000 grand prize. At the same time, he posted a record
breaking TPA tournament average of .923. In races to nine, he breezed through the
eighty player double elimination field with wins over Harris (2), Kelly (7), Munson
(7), Brown (3), Varner (6), and Strickland three times (7), (6), and (5).
More from Accu-stats said:Reyes' near flawless
play extended his winning streak at the Sands to
twenty sessions in a row. He missed a total of
fifteen balls for the entire tournament. Some players
missed that many in a single session.
Jay has to re tell the story every couple of years or so.![]()
It's all in here:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Encyclopedia-Pool-Hustlers-assortment/dp/1494219468
Good read!
Efren could not qualify for a US visa as a visitor .
He had below high school education and did not speak English.
So, he used CM's passport.
I know the whole story but I ain't telling........at least not now. :smile:
I'm just too busy.
P.S. I see a lot of baloney on here already. For shame!
This is a link to the part of his bio where they cover his coming to the U.S.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HidbOYS3zPY#t=633
Ronnie Alcano said he pulled his teeth out to look like Efren. WTF! Now that is a true fan.
THANKS for pointing that out!!! Didn't even know that existed. I'm considering getting it, but one question though: Why the fudge does such a book have only 2 reviews on Amazon????? Is it very detailed or does it just tell us basically what we already know?