sjm said:Actually, I was reacting to the post of VIP Professor, in which it was suggested that the question should instead be who was next after Orcullo, not Efren. I failed to quote his post, though, and that was my mistake.
Orcullo may well prove to be a future superstar, and its understandable that he has Efren's fullest respect, but until he beats the deepest, most talented, and internationally diverse fields the game has to offer, it still qualifies as potential rather than as achievement.
linds said:rustin abit but still capable...
andam
kiamko
lining
cuartero
calasang
upcomming (3G)
about a dozen 12-15y/o soon on WPC'07
![]()
Great assessment! I totally agree with you and only time will tell, so let the show begin!ginsu said:In fact, if you have followed Reyes career it is simialar to Dennis's at the same stages. In his earlier years Reyes was a cash player not really great in tourneys. Actually Dennis has won more Tournments at this stage then Reyes. Who know's they may end up fairly comparable in the end.
linds said:rustin abit but still capable...
andam
kiamko
lining
cuartero
calasang
upcomming (3G)
about a dozen 12-15y/o soon on WPC'07
![]()
VIProfessor said:You have a valid point, and I must say that it's a question that perhaps cannot be settled, inasmuch as we are dealing with two different competitive arenas. I readily concede Efren's superiority in the overall category. When it comes to the rotation games however, we are left at an impasse over the age-old question: Who's the better player? The one who wins the tournaments or the one who comes in and robs him afterwards? I guess my opinion is obvious, I lean with player who will come out standing (and flush) after a long session.
I strongly suspect that it is just a matter of Orcullo learning to come with it NOW, as you must in a tournament, rather than relying on the fact that the overall strength of game will catch up with the opponent in the long run. When that happens, I don't think there will be any doubt as to who is the best nine-ball player out of the Phillipines.
sjm said:Efren is the greatest player that has ever lived.
VIProfessor said:You have a valid point, and I must say that it's a question that perhaps cannot be settled, inasmuch as we are dealing with two different competitive arenas. I readily concede Efren's superiority in the overall category. When it comes to the rotation games however, we are left at an impasse over the age-old question: Who's the better player? The one who wins the tournaments or the one who comes in and robs him afterwards? I guess my opinion is obvious, I lean with player who will come out standing (and flush) after a long session.
I strongly suspect that it is just a matter of Orcullo learning to come with it NOW, as you must in a tournament, rather than relying on the fact that the overall strength of game will catch up with the opponent in the long run. When that happens, I don't think there will be any doubt as to who is the best nine-ball player out of the Phillipines. After all, nine-ball has never been Efren's strongest game due to his break. When Efren was at his peak Archer was still the better nine-ball player, by most accounts. Yet, not too many people, as far as I know, have ever said that Archer or anybody else was a better all-around player than the Magician
In the final analysis, the devil lies in the details!
Peace,
VIProfessor
P.S.--IMHO, being "the money king" of the Phillipines is in fact a tremendous achievement, particularly when considering the overall strength of the top Filipino players!
sjm said:When Orcullo wins anything important, let me know. Until then, he is not even mentionable with Reyes.
I don't care who beats who for the cash. In our sport, the champions are the ones that go to battle against all the greats at once and manage to be the last man standing.
Efren is the greatest player that has ever lived. Orcullo's potential is obvious, but his credentials are close to non-existent in the world's most premier events, meaning those having a diverse and deep international field.
The Beginner said:Next to Efren I would say:
1. Alex - 27 year old and counting... main Achievement are WPC and U.S. OPEN which reyes won his first US open in 1994 and WPC in 1999. If Alex focus on playing pool rather than Poker or Casino he will achieve more tournament.
2. Manalo - due to recent shows in the major tournament like IPT. As we all know Manalo started playing 9 ball recently. Most of his games was snooker
3. Alcano - Recent achievement 2006 WPC champion remember its a prestigious tournament to win.
4. Busta - An Excellent player that never won a major tournament. My respect still on Busta.
5. Orcollo - King of Money game in the Phil doesn't mean you will get the respect from the Pro like Archer, Hoffman, Ralf this people will respect you if you are winning big tournaments ...money game will not bring you to HALL OF FAME.
6 Parica - The leader of US domination. My respect still on Amang
![]()
linds said:rustin abit but still capable...
andam
kiamko
lining
cuartero
calasang
upcomming (3G)
about a dozen 12-15y/o soon on WPC'07
![]()