I think your entire series is excellent, and one of the better instructional resources on YouTube! Obviously the graphics are excellent visualization aids, and we appreciate the effort that went into them. I also like that the videos are on important common sense topics that many instructors ignore (like "Inspecting the table").
These new "rack analysis" clips might be helpful, especially for intermediate players, but they are not as time efficient as delving directly into an important topic. Also, from the standpoint of the "science of learning," making a large number of points (from analyzing all the shots in a rack) gives the student too many things to remember --- consequently he or she remembers none, or at best the one that caught his attention. It's the same problem as seeing a student with eight problems with his mechanics and stroke; you just can NOT tell him any more than the one or two most important flaws, or you're wasting your breath. The theory of wondering what a pro is thinking about is nice, but I'd say the shotgun approach to learning a variety of reasons is not as helpful as a targeted approach from a rifle. I would suggest using this format only occasionally, for very unusual or incredible situations, where the pro was faced with a difficult dilemma, and either failed or succeeded based on his judgment. In such a situation, I would think it better to spend the entire video diving deeply into the various choices and consequences of the one shot, rather than a quick summary of the reason behind every shot in a rack.
My only other suggestion to be helpful might be to focus your video titles a little tighter. For example, "Understanding the cue ball" tells me nothing about the content, while "Understanding bend off the tangent line" might catch people's interest more. All in all, you're developing a great channel --- keep up the good work!!
