First let me say I do not use a Predator cue or shaft or any other laminated shaft or cue. When Predator first came out on the market it was an instant sucess simply because Predator was very good at how they presented the pro's and con's of using one. Now I am certain that Predator Shafts do have the ability to be non-deflective, but my point is what is that single fact really worth. Because that is the only thing a Predator shaft has over any other shaft!!!!!!Period. In my opinion are they worth what you pay for the shafts
NO are the cues special in any major way
NO.
When Predator first came out with their product they made the statement that it would be the last shaft you would ever need. To go farther, they made the statement that once you used and became proficient with a Predator shaft, you could pick up any cue with one and there would be no difference in the shaft deflection. We all know that people become use to, and attached to the shaft on their playing cue where a Predator type shaft or a standard non-laminated shaft. In fact when a person changes cues for any reason, the difference in the shafts will effect their game more than anything else.
Now with that being said and understanding that the cues shaft has more effect for most people changing cues Predator came up with an idea. Predator marketed their shafts with the perception that once you get use to the way a Predator shaft plays, due to it's design every Predator shaft would feel exactly the same to the user. Now if that were true that would certainly be a great advantage along with the fact that the shaft reduces deflection. However, with time many people have found out that this claim was simple not true, and they found out that while all Predator shafts do reduce deflection no two do it to the exact same degree. Now some would say that the problems have only gotten worst since the production moved to China, well I doubt that is true. Since the shaft dowels where made in China almost from the beginning of the companies production. This was going on even during the years the Cues and Shafts were being assembled in Canada by Falcon Cues.
Now please bear with me here, and I am not making a joke predator shafts are like Crack Cocaine. Once you adjust your game to a Predator shaft or other similar shaft you are hooked, not because it is better than a standard non-laminated shaft, simply because it is different. The difference will cause you miss shots with a standard shaft, simply because you have adjusted to a Predator shaft. Does this make the Predator shaft better
Certainly Not, only different, but any difference in your game will make you stick with what you are using. So like I said you are now Hooked, and you can use nothing but a predator shaft effectively. So once you are hooked Predator can expect you to buy a new shaft every so many years, or maybe step up and buy a shaft and one of their cues.
My only question is was this their plan from the beginning? It certainly could have been, kinda like the Coco Cola Company around the turn of the century. In my opinion, anyone who can
LEARN to use Predator shaft, can certainly
LEARN to use a non-laminated shaft and in the long run for a lot less money. Lets face it folks while their certainly is something that can be said for having good equipment. There is a hell of lot more that can be said about having the ability to use the equipment you have. I know that some will say that well look at all the Pro's who use this equipment it must be great, look what it does for them, and this is true
THEY ARE PRO'S. But the question could they also do the same thing without a Predator shaft, the answer is certainly yes. First of all, while I am certain that many do use and like the equipment, most started using it in the first place due to endorsements, like I said these shafts are like Crack!!!:grin: In addition they do not have to buy these shafts like normal players do, these shafts are put in their hands for free for the advertisement only.
I know that many will not agree with me here, but this is just my opinion.